Walter Russell And The Secret Of Light...

The world in facing down a threat to decency and humanity. What does it say? is more than just a one-fault question. It is a big idea. because of oppression... has been... gathered inside the church... faithful faithful faithful faithful faithful faithful A new world order. A new world order. A new world order. A new world order. You're listening to the Alchemical Tech Revolution, and I am your host, Wayne McRoy. Good evening, good morning, wherever you are around the world tonight. We're going to take a look... Walter Russell and the Secret of Light. We're going to be looking into a compilation of works from Walter Russell and this one comes from a work titled A New Concept of the Universe by Walter Russell and we're going to discuss some of the things that Walter Russell laid down. Now Walter Russell claimed to have had an illumination experience and much of what he recorded in book form was put forward about these discoveries and these revelations he had about the mysteries of the universe, how things truly work, and what he had learned during that time period where he had this experience. So Walter Russell had a sort of epiphany moment where all of this information came to him all at once, and he decided to put this down in book form. And he gave many lectures and composed many things talking about this and came up with his own cosmogony for how things work based upon those things he allegedly learned when he had this illumination experience. So he put this all out there and some of the things that he detailed in his writings align very heavily with much of what I've discovered in my own research and looking at this stuff as far as the nature of manifestation in the physical reality we live in and things of that nature. And Walter Russell had some really interesting ideas. And a lot of this actually stems from older ways of thinking about the electromagnetic spectrum and how it relates to everything else in this world and how all of these things are very simple types of observable phenomena. that we could experience across the board through different many facets of life. When we look at the natural world, we see the same patterns emerge over and over again. It's sort of like the same overall field, that all of this stuff exists within and throughout. So we have this cosmogony explained here by Walter Russell, which seems to reify certain ideas that that were put forward in some of the science of physics back in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Some of this can apply to field theory or ether physics, as it was widely known, and some of the ideas that Russell put forward aligned very much with the things that these scientists at that time were discovering. So I think it's an interesting thing to take a look at, and of course... One of the key facets to this is what Walter Russell thought about the concept of light. What exactly is it? And this is something that I think really transcends the scientific viewpoint of thinking. We have to explore the philosophical ways of viewing this stuff in order to understand this. And this is something that Walter Russell claims is one of the secrets of the ages. It has to do with What is the very nature of light itself? What is it? And how does it really operate? And this is much different than the standard model of physics that we're handed. So let's get right into the reading here. And we had done just one episode prior talking about some of Walter Russell's work here. And this is a continuation of that. But this one goes a little deeper. than the things we talked about on that surface-level program that we did discussing Walter Russell's cosmogony. So this one goes deeper and talks about some of the things in this world that maybe need a little bit clearer explanation, and Walter Russell gives us a clearer explanation, although most of the mainstream would reject his notions of things, but certainly I think it's worthy of consideration, and I think he came really close to understanding the true machinations of how this reality works. So without further ado, let's get into it. And we're going to read from a portion of this titled, The Secret of the Ages. Step by simple step, I will briefly unfold the supreme mystery of all time to enable science to void the confusion which has arisen from its inability to relate the reality of the invisible universe... to its simulation of reality which has so regrettably deceived the senses of observers for all time. I'm going to pause for a moment. So Walter Russell is speaking of the invisible world or invisible worlds and the true nature of manifestation, cause and effect, all of these things. We don't really take a clear look at the invisible world as a source of causation in our modern science. And we need to do so. This is how we have understanding. The things that emanate out of this invisible world into the visible world are one of the core foundations around which manifestation of a thing comes about. And when we lack this understanding or disregard this understanding and try to pin it all down to material world physical cause and effect sequences for the source of all phenomena here, We miss the whole point. And this is something Russell was pointing out, and you'll notice that he says that the inability of us to recognize this invisible world is what gives us the inability to relate to the reality of what he calls this simulation of reality that we see. Now, are we living in a simulation? I don't think that's the case. I think what he's referring to in essence here is the reflection, the material world, physical world reflection of spiritual concepts manifesting here. It's kind of like more along the lines of what you would call the holographic reality, that whole scenario, where it's a holographic reality, and it's all based upon the manifestation of light in the spectrum in which we are able to sense those things with our five senses. So we're looking at this way of thinking here, this philosophical way of thinking presented by Russell. And this is probably where some people will misconstrue some things. And we see that this whole simulation theory has become very popular in a lot of the conspiracy culture as of late. And there's a reason for this because this is trying to steer our minds towards this whole technocrat agenda of transhumanism and metaverse technologies and things of that nature. artificial realities that they want to create, digital realities, digital playgrounds, which are a synthetic knockoff of the real thing in which we exist. Now, Russell here is speaking of the real thing in which we exist. And when he says simulation, I think it's something more akin to holographic reflection of the spiritual invisible world. So with that out of the way, let's go ahead and continue here. So he says he does this not only for science, but for the great need of religion, which so sorely needs a God who can be known by all men as one to replace the many imagined concepts of God which have so disastrously disunited the human race. No one, save the few mystics of long ages, has ever known God or God's ways. I'm going to pause for a moment here, and this is where I disagree with Russell in some regards with that statement. I don't think it was only the mystics who truly knew God. People today still know God. You can have a personal relationship with him. That is not something that is only intended for the mystics, and it is not something that only the mystics of antiquity really knew. I disagree with Russell there, but that's beside the point. Let's get back to the reading here. He says, Neither has mankind yet known the meaning of love upon which the universe is founded. nor of life, which the electric universe simulates in never-ending cycles, nor of cause of the effects, for which man so heavily pays in tears and anguish, for his not knowing, nor the constitution of matter, nor of God's invisible processes in the creation of pressures for conditioning matter. So I'm going to pause for a moment here. Now, of this portion, I think he is most certainly correct. We have a lack of understanding of cause and effect sequences in this universe, and we fail to recognize the role of these invisible worlds or this invisible world in that, in the sources that cause, the actual cause of effects that we do see. And this... is a shame because we don't really understand these processes in the natural creation. Although I think some of the ancients, the alchemists, and some of the older hermeticists of antiquity maybe had a little closer understanding of this than what we do today. And here we see a lot of this brought forward in the works of people like Walter Russell. They're kind of reifying some of the older ideas that I think were intended for the good of mankind and were recorded for the good of mankind, but what had happened through the course of time is you had a select few family bloodlines and people who belonged to the priest class of the ages past that recorded some of this information and kept it hidden from the largely illiterate masses, the ones who can't read and didn't understand this, weren't able to convey this meaning in a written form because they couldn't read it or record it, and they hid some of this information away and used it and leveraged it for their own ends. And this has gone on for a very, very long time. Thus we have the arisal of what was called mystery schools or mystery religions back then, where this priest class controlled the external or exoteric forms of worship and kept the esoteric secrets secret, hidden away from the masses in order to control those masses for their own means and ends. So this is largely what happened. So a lot of this information got hidden away for a very long time, but just like everything else, it is always going to come to the light of day at some point. All those things that were done in the dark in ages past are coming to the light of day now. It's being seen out there in the open. We are indeed living in the time of revelations. And a lot of this stuff that's been hidden, a lot of these concepts, are now coming back into the view of a lot more people's eyes than what they were in the past. So we have guys like Walter Russell who recorded some of this and had this experience, and wouldn't you know, it aligns with some of the old teachings. And here we are, going over this now. And I think it's a matter of importance. So he talks about God's invisible processes in the creation of pressures for the conditioning of matter. And matter is just a reflection of spirit. Let's put it that way. But let's continue with the reading here from Walter Russell. The long-heralded peace which patheth understanding awaits for science to tear away the veil which has for so long hidden the face of the Creator. Religion can be united as one only by dispelling the ignorance which now cloaks the faith and belief god of fear, which has bred so many intolerant groups of unknowing men. We speak familiarly about the spiritual, invisible mind universe of the creator, and we speak with equal familiarity about the physical universe of matter, which we call creation. But the world has not yet known either of them separately. nor their unity as one to sufficiently define either of them scientifically. Going to pause for a moment here. So now on this point, I think that maybe here Walter Russell was on to something. We speak about this invisible mind universe of the creator, and we speak about this physical universe we see, and we consider them to be two separate things, one maybe being the reflection of the other, and we don't thoroughly understand either of them. and we have not truly experienced either of them separately one from another, because all the things that we experience are filtered through our mind, our senses, our individual lens of observation. So, that being the case, do we really know the machinations of the universe around us? We know what we perceive through our physical senses here, and we can process the information we get from our senses here through our mind, and our mind's eye. And it's only through that that we learn and we know. And this gives us a kind of limited faculty for understanding when you look at it at that way of thinking, when you look at it in that context. So all of the physical reality that we exist in is filtered through the lens of our mind. So you can't really separate one from the other, because our mind perceives these things and interprets them for us, although we exist in this physical form. I hope I'm making sense to you, because this is essentially what Walter Russell was saying here. But he says we don't sufficiently define either of these terms well enough to truly understand them in a scientific way. So then Walter Russell continues here and he says, I will now do this as simply as possible in order that the physicist of tomorrow can know and comprehend the universe as one whole instead of sensing it as many separate parts which he will never be able to fit together. And I'm going to pause for a moment and I think this is an important concept because essentially what Walter Russell is presenting to us here is a unified way of comprehending the universe, looking at the big picture, rather than separate compartmentalized little sections thereof. And what is our education system today based upon? It's based upon this compartmentalization concept. All of our society derives around this and circulates around this, this whole compartmentalization campaign that's been done here. Now that is the opposite of the procedures and the process that's known as cybernetics, which is looking at whole systems. It's taking a look at the big picture rather than delineating its separate parts. Now we always look at everything in terms of separate parts, but Walter Russell is going to give us an overview of the big picture here. So this is an important thing to comprehend, and you have to think outside the box a little bit with this You have to think philosophically, not just scientifically, and be able to cross the bounds of both science and philosophy with this. Anyway, let's get to the next portion here, which is titled The Undivided Light. The basis of creation is the light of the mind which created it. God is the light of mind. God's thinking mind is all there is. Mind is universal. Mind of God and mind of man are one. This eternally creating universe, which is God's eternally renewing body, is the product of mind, knowing expressed through mind thinking. In the light of God's mind is all knowledge. All knowledge means full knowing of the creator's one idea, which manifested in his creation. The undivided and unconditional light of mind is an eternal state of rest. That invisible light of the spirit... is equilibrium of absolute balance and absolute stillness, which is the foundation of the divided and pressure-conditioned universe of motion. I'm going to pause for a moment here. So now we've all heard the expression, mind precedes all. And he claims, Russell claims, the mind of God and the mind of man are essentially one. One is a manifestation of the other. Once again, you may find a little differentiation in some belief systems here I don't necessarily agree exactly with Russell's cosmogony here, or his idea that the mind of man and the mind of God are essentially the same thing. I think they are two separate things. I think God is the greater mind of all, the bringer of all knowledge, the creator of all things. And I think man, created in his image, also has a similar ability, and our minds can affect the reality around us in certain limited ways. But we are not the same as God. Let's put it that way. Yes, we have this notion of these divisions within the universe, and all of that may be connected. But I think God transcends that and goes beyond that. And this is where a lot of the occultists get it wrong. They would say that we are God. If we are one with God, we are small fractals of God, we are then indeed God. And I think that's a misconception. We can never be God. We are not God. We are not the creator. We are the creations, but we can manifest our own creations within this greater creation. And we are made in the image of God, so we do have that creative force within us as well. And maybe to a certain degree, our spirits, our small fractal pieces, manifest from God into this place. I don't know if I could really describe this in a way that can adequately be expressed with words. This is the challenge of our time. This is the challenge of all time, really. And I think our limited, finite human minds have a hard time comprehending the incomprehensible. We only know the things we know through our limited physical senses here. And there's so much that exists beyond the bounds of our physical senses here that we can hardly fathom what that is. conceptually is like. Therefore, we have a hard time grasping the reality of exactly just how all-encompassing God is. And the fact that God is separate from the creation, the creator is separate from the creation, yet permeates throughout all of the creation. It seems like a dichotomy of thought. It seems like an oxymoron. But this is indeed the nature of existence. God is everywhere and nowhere. It's an interesting way of thinking. And I think Russell did his very best to try to express these ideas in ways we could understand and express the nature of created reality as emanating from God and man perhaps having a place in that just simply because our consciousness resides here. And because our consciousness resides here, we have a type of an effect on this creation. Now this has been proven out in various mainstream scientific physics experiments. The mere observation, the mere act of observing something, actually changes it in some way. They'll use this argument in quantum physics to explain the wave-particle duality of light, as they like to call it, and I think it's all a misnomer, really. But certainly... This has been proven. The mere act of observation of a thing can change the outcome. We know this. This has been recorded. And this is all part and parcel of this notion of mind influencing reality around us. Well, the great mind, the big mind, that is the creator of all, is the mind of God. And we have the small mind, the mind of man, interacts with that creation. So if we think in those terms, I think it's a more apt description of of what goes on here. Anyway, not to diverge from the reading too much, but let's go ahead and read on. So Russell says, In that light there is no change, no variance of condition, no form, and no motion. It is the zero universe of reality. In it are all of the mind qualities of knowledge, inspiration, power, love, truth, balance, and law, which are never created... but are simulated in moving quantities in the divided universe of moving waves, which we call matter. I'm going to pause again. So now we're touching upon scientific principles here, things that have been shown in the realms of modern physics. He's talking about the zero point. He's talking about that connecting point, that nexus between what we know as space and counter space. This is essentially what we're seeing. Light is a manifestation from out of counter space, out of this balance, this condition of balance where there's no variation and change, the zero universe of reality, as Russell calls it here. It's pure potentiality. Let's put it that way. It's pure potential, and when potential manifests, it becomes light, as we'll see here, which later... can be described as matter. It's an interesting way of thinking, so let's continue reading from Russell's words here. He says, The light of mind is the zero fulcrum of the wave lever from which motion is projected. Its zero condition is eternal. The unfortunate error of science lies in assuming that the power which belongs solely to the fulcrum of light at rest is in the motion of the lever, which simulates that power. And I'm going to pause for a moment here. So now Russell is giving us some really key points and good food for thought to think about. So he's describing this zero condition as being eternal. It is the wave lever from which motion is projected. So it is this stillness, this absolute stillness, this state of being that there is no motion, there's no change, it is constant, and it is a fulcrum. That's how he describes it. So it's the point at which the lever rests upon. And then the lever could be moved one way or the other through the application of forces. Now where do these forces come from? That is the question. It essentially translates into a type of pressure mediation between space and counter space. This fulcrum point, this nexus point, as I like to call it, is known by the quantum physicists as the zero point. And this zero point transcends mere physics. Let's put it that way. They like to view this stuff in the terms of physics. And manifestation goes way beyond that. This is all about how things begin to manifest in this reality. Where do they come from? Well, they come from this invisible world that's on the other side of this fulcrum. This existence, this eternal existence that is perfect rest, perfect balance, perfect peace. Pure potentiality. Counterspace, if you will, if you want to describe it in the physics term. And there's this fulcrum point. It's this nexus between those two worlds. This is wherein manifestation begins. Now, what is this fulcrum? How can we define this nexus point, this fulcrum? Well, it's mind, ladies and gentlemen. Mind. Consciousness, if you will. It is the very thing that causes motion, first motion, in this physical universe that we see. The mind. So when we say mind precedes all things, that's true. Mind has an effect. Consciousness has an effect. This is what consciousness is. It's this nexus point between the two worlds, between the invisible world of pure potential and the visible physical material world, this dense chemical region as we know it from the Rosicrucian Cosmoconception. We have... in effect, between those two. And what does this manifestation look like? Well, it manifests first as light, or what you would call, I guess, in a more pure form, from the term light, you could think of it in terms of absolute energy, if you want to put it that way. And now these are poorly defined terms. These are all poorly defined terms, and that's why it's very hard to comprehend what exactly that Russell was envisioning here and what he was trying to lay down, because we lack the words in our limited language to describe what this is. So he described it as light, and this is largely what the occultists of old described it as, light. Now, are we talking about visible light that we can see, or are we talking about the entire spectrum of I think we're talking about the entire spectrum, wherein there is invisible portions of, and therefore this limited visible range that we have is what most people think about, but it goes beyond that. There's something more to it. Now let's see if Russell could explain this in a little bit simpler terms for us as we continue, because part two here, that we're reading from next is called The Divided Light. In the light of the creator's mind is desire to dramatize his one idea by dividing it into one unconditioned, unchanging unity of balance and rest into pairs of oppositely conditioned units, which must forever interchange with each other to seek balance and rest. Desire then multiplies those pairs of units into into an infinity of eternal repetitions to give formed bodies to the Creator's imaginings. All formed bodies are created in His image. Through the expression of desire in light, this universal drama of cause and effect effect is created as the product of mind-knowing divided by mind-thinking. Gonna pause for a moment here. So you could know something without thinking on that. And this is an example of what he's talking about here. To know something and to think about something are two separate operations of mind. Now, we don't think of that in terms of consciousness, do we? Or in terms of God, the creator of all things. They're two separate acts. They're two separate byproducts of mind. Thinking and knowing. You can know a thing without thinking about it. And likewise, you could think about something without knowing about it. And this is wherein we get a lot of confusion because... Our simple, finite human brains can only comprehend things that we understand with our physical senses here. So what do we do? We create analogy. We create allegory to try to explain things in ways that we could comprehend and understand. Because of our limited understanding of this universe around us, we oftentimes falter in our descriptions of things, and we don't know what we're talking about. but we think about what we can know. And this is an important appellation to make here. But anyway, I don't want to put words in Russell's mouth, and I'll add my own two cents here as we go as to how I comprehend what it is that he's laying down here. But let's get back to his words directly.' Cause is eternally at rest in the balanced unity of the undivided light.' Cause is one. Effect is eternally in motion to seek balance and rest in the centering equilibrium of the two opposed lights of this divided universe, which finds only to lose. Effect is two. Gonna pause for a moment. So now he says, in terms here that are veering towards the philosophical, that the cause, or the first cause, or prima causa, as talked about by some of the hermeticists, this is essentially the basis of reality from which everything emanates, the one. And then he says effect is two. So the effect that we see in our physical world manifest is twofold. It's a polarity. And that is what he's saying. So in order for the one idea to express, it expresses in this physical manifestation as polar opposites. And then it's the union of these opposites that become the important thing for reaching back to this oneness, this reunification with oneness. Now, I hope you're understanding what it is he's saying here in this does make some sense based upon the foundations that have been laid down by the old secret teachings of the secret doctrine of the various mystery schools and occult fraternities. And if you understand some of those systems of thinking, you might be understanding what it is that Russell is trying to unify here into this one way of understanding manifestation here. So cause and effect, we think about them in a wrong light. Cause, as he says here, emanates from the one, from the invisible realms on the other side of the nexus point, or the fulcrum as he calls it, the mind, and beyond the mind is the invisible world, the world of causation, if you want to call it that, counter space, if you want to think in terms of physics and field theory, causation, So, counterspace, the mind is the fulcrum, and then this physical reality is where the effects take place. And the effect, which comes emanating from the cause, from the other side, always manifests as a duality or a polarity principle. The two opposites, the extreme opposites. And we see this reflected in hermetic teachings. You could look at the hermetic pairs of opposites. as an example for this. So this is what Russell argues here. I shouldn't say argues. This is how he lays it down and how he understood the cosmogony of things that was allegedly revealed to him when he had this illumination experience. Now, is he correct in his thinking with this? I don't know. I don't have all the answers. But I think I understand what he's saying, and I think a lot of it makes sense. to a certain degree or another. Now, I may disagree on some of the finer points with what he had laid down here, but he's trying to express this in language that people could understand. And sometimes we miss the mark because sometimes that language just doesn't exist. Sometimes we can't describe something with the things that we know. And this, once again... just gives us a picture of how limited the human mind is in its understanding. We could only know what we could know based upon our own experiences and observations. And oftentimes, even if you do understand something or know a thing, you have a hard time expressing it to others. That is one of the very... Difficult things to overcome when you're trying to reach through to other minds with this type of information, with this understanding that the reality we live in functions very differently than what we have been taught. It's difficult to express some of these ideas to a mind who maybe hasn't ever taken the time to look at things through this philosophical lens. who has maybe only been indoctrinated in a one type of worldview, one in which the strictly physical criteria we could sense with our five senses here is expressed and pushed and promoted, and all explanation of phenomena that they have ever looked at is expressed in this way. This is what our modern scientific paradigm looks like. It tries very much to make people believe that this physical, dense chemical region of reality that we exist in is all that there is, that there's no spiritual component, there's no outside invisible worlds that have an effect here, and that all phenomena could be explained away by some physical cause and effect sequence. And when people accept that, and they're indoctrinated into the hyper-materialist paradigm, they lose sight of these different philosophical concepts, and they have a very hard time understanding it, because in order to understand it, you have to unlearn everything you thought you knew. And this is a difficult and painful process for most people, but we are seeing an uptick in this going on in the modern world today. Many people have discovered through the course of time that their world doesn't make sense anymore, that the things they're told and taught don't add up, and they're discovering they've been lied to and deceived on a lot of different levels. So now they're beginning to rethink things. And this is the start point for many of us. And when it gets down to the point where you have to tear back your understanding to the core foundations of the things you've been indoctrinated to believe, when you get there... then your mind opens up a little bit to accept these more philosophical ways of looking at things. And you have a better conception, then, of how things work. Because things begin to make sense, then, when you look at it through this type of lens of observation. Whereas in the strictly scientific paradigm, or the worldly view of things, if you want to call it that, the worldly view that handed us by popular culture and civilization as we know it. The things they tell you, well, they don't make sense, do they? Something as simple as, how did this universe that we live in come about? Well, what do they teach you, largely in academia, in the worldly view of things? Well, they try to cite something they call the Big Bang. So they tell you about 20 billion years ago, or whatever it is now, 20 billion years ago, nothing exploded and became everything. And to them, that makes sense. But to tell them, you know, there's a God, there's a creator, this reality we live in is intelligently designed. You can see this based upon all the things you can observe in nature. There has to be some type of intelligent design behind this. how all these things operate, there are laws and principles that this reality is guided by, which have to come from some source somewhere. you don't just have random accidents creating laws and operational foundational principles of manifestation that just does not occur if there was nothing and nothing exploded and became everything it would be much more of a chaotic soup in which everything exists. And then to say life arose from that explosion of nothing into everything, it doesn't lack any type of stupidity, really. That whole notion, it's stupid on the face of it. It does not make any sense whatsoever. But people, it's very profound that people in the scientific viewpoint will accept this and call that reality. Consciousness arose from this explosion of nothing into everything. And here's the thing. There is no such thing as nothing. It cannot exist. Because if it were to exist, it would violate the very principle of what nothingness is. It's a reification that, once again, the human mind and its finite resources cannot comprehend. So there's no such thing as a state of nothingness. So nothing could never exist, and therefore, if nothing could never exist, then it can't possibly explode and become everything. It's a logical fallacy, but it is one accepted by science, and you find this across the board with all of the different things that they espouse. So tearing all that down and getting back to the brass tacks of understanding of things, unlearning everything you thought you knew, and getting back to basics is where you start. And then once you do that, you begin to realize that perhaps some of the older cultures, maybe they knew some more things about the nature of reality than we do. And that maybe some of these things that Walter Russell here is talking about aren't so crazy after all. Let's go ahead. We'll get back to the writings of Russell here. So he says, the light of cause... divided into the two opposed lights of effect, is the one sole occupation of mind which we call thinking. I'm going to pause for a moment. So now he's defining these different operations within the mind in a different way. So remember, we have knowing and we have thinking. So now he's defining this mind. Division of cause, the light of cause, into these two effects, these two polarities, this is what we call thinking. So this is an active principle, whereas knowing is a passive principle. And you see how we can correspond to this in that way, through the same reasoning? Let's continue. So he says, mind thinking sets divided idea into two-way opposed motion to produce the effect of simulating idea by giving form to it. Formed bodies are but pressure-conditioned motion, however. They are not the idea which they simulate. Ah, so now we're getting somewhere. I'm going to pause for a second. Now we're getting somewhere. So now he's saying the idea or the ideal is the reality. And the formed body, the form that is made from the idea, is split off into the effects from the idea, from the source, from the prime source. These are just a poor reflection of the idea. It's a pressure-conditioned motion that manifests as form. That's what all form is. That's what matter is. It's a pressure-conditioned motion. Everything is motion. Remember that. Think of what Nikola Tesla taught us. He said in order to understand the workings of reality, you have to think in terms of frequency and vibration. What's he speaking about? Motion. You'll find the Hermeticists talk about this too. Motion. This is the key to manifestation. It's the key to reality. It's the key to matter. Matter is a vibratory frequency. That is much higher than that of an energetic state as we would express it in this reality. So matter essentially is hard light. I've heard it described like this before. And this has been proven in scientific experiments now. Where they were able to actually compress light enough so that it actually took on mass. And took on a type of form or physicality. a type of body or form or matter. They were able to condense light into matter in scientific experiments. I believe it was at CERN or somewhere like that. You could go look that up. But this has been proven to be a fact. I think that was done in 2020, if memory serves me correctly. So there's proof of concept there. So certainly, we can understand some things. So... This notion of light being at the core of manifestation is an important thing. And it's all a matter of frequency, vibration, motion rate. Something vibrates throughout these different realms of manifestation in different directions. The Hermeticists talk about this. And this brings into existence a manifestation of a form based upon the vibration of the idea or the ideal from the spiritual side. Now, this is where things get interesting because you could talk about the unification of the science of physics with consciousness, the very nature of consciousness. Consciousness itself essentially is the source of or what manifests from the other side, from the invisible worlds, and causes this vibratory rate to begin to create form in this physical reality. Consciousness, mind, thought. I hope this makes sense to you. So the next portion here, Walter Russell, talks about the Electric Universe of Simulated Idea. And this, I think, is where the rubber meets the road. With the true nature of manifestation in this physical, dense chemical region reality that we are familiar with, it all has to do with this electric universe idea, electricity, magnetism, these two polar opposites, once again another manifestation of this one as the source consciousness, separating into two effects, the prima causa separating into the polarized opposite effects in order to create a motion in the physical universe as we know it and create manifestation. And I think this is demonstrable with the electromagnetic force, the dielectric field. Field theory touches upon some of these ideas and you'll see It all stems and derives from consciousness. If you separate consciousness out of the equation, then it doesn't work. Things don't manifest. And you have stagnation. You can't separate consciousness away or out of the science and be able to understand how things work. Then you wind up with these divided theories of physics. Things like quantum theory and string theory and relativity theory and all of these things which don't jive with each other at all. And they cannot explain things on the micro scale or things on the macro scale or the observed reality. Because they've tried to separate these ideas... from the form in their attempt to create the world of shells you see they want to be able to quantify everything in some physical cause and effect sequence state so that they can control it and that they can somehow unify their theories into a workable form And they've never been able to do so, and this manifests as a lack of a unified physics. They will never be able to unify these different theories or concepts of physics without recognizing or acknowledging consciousness as being something inherent here. in this. And this is where field theory goes a little differently, or what you might call ether theory. Because ether theory, in essence, although it doesn't speak directly of consciousness or mind being a part of it, The mere presence of an ether would tend to lean towards that being the case, that there has to be mind present, there has to be consciousness present, there's something else that exists outside the duality or polarity. There has to exist this counterspace, this nexus point in counterspace, this fulcrum, the mind, if you will, that brings forth the prima causa from counter space and makes it manifest here in its polarized forms. And you can't get there without putting consciousness into the mix. So this is where our modern science, in my view, gets it wrong, except for maybe some of these theories that have to do with the Electric Universe model. And that's where Russell comes in here now with his expression of this same type of an idea. And I hope I'm not losing any of you on this. As I have said earlier, many of these ideas are very difficult to express with our finite, limited human language. It's something that you either get it or you don't. You know or you don't. And all the thinking in the world may not be able to get you there until you've gotten to the point where you can accept certain ideas as having merit and thinking outside the box and forgetting your old programming and indoctrination into the physical sciences solely in this world. And that's what this world of shells idea is all about and what our modern scientific paradigm is all about. Our modern science, or more rightly called scientism, is all about strictly physical science. Now, there's a metaphysical side of things that they disregard, but you can't disregard the metaphysical because it is concurrently in existence with the physical, and one cannot operate without the other. There are two sides of the same coin. Without counterspace, there can be no space. If you want to use the physics angle of it. They both have to be present. They both have to be accounted for in order to have an understanding of how it works. And we still have a very limited understanding of how it works. But when you could combine the metaphysical with the physical, you get a little closer to the true qualities of manifestation in this way. So the electric universe of simulated idea. Mind thinking is electric. Divided electric thought pulsations manifest creative desire in wave cycles of motion which forever vibrate between the two electric thought conditions of concentration and decentration. Concentration and produce the opposed pressures of compression and expansion, which solid bodies of motion surrounded by gaseous space in one wave pulsation and reverse that order in the next. I'm going to pause for a moment. So he's thinking in terms of concentration and decentration. So it's almost like a pulsation that goes on. This creates the motion. This is the motion which we're speaking of. Consciousness in motion. The vibration rate. Concentrative thinking is centripetal. It focuses to a point. It borns gravity. It charges by multiplying low potential into high and cold into heat. I'm going to pause for a moment. Okay, so now we're getting somewhere in terms of physics. and in terms of the electromagnetic field, or field theory, the dielectric field, how it operates. And this, once again, harkens back to some of the things taught by the Hermeticists and by some of the older alchemical sciences. There are different patterns... which occur in these different fields that exist around us, these different invisible worlds around us, in the etheric, the astral, if you want to go that way, use the Rosicrucian descriptions for these things, the motions take on different forms. Like they, in the one field, they go in straight lines. In another field, they make a spiral pattern. In yet another field, they make a zigzag pattern. And I'm talking about these different planes of existence, which comprise these invisible worlds, the spiritual realms, on the other side of this nexus, this fulcrum point, this zero point, the mind, if you want to call it that. Motion occurs emanating from there, from that stillness in counter-space, And it steps down into this physical layer through these various other regions. These subplanes, if you will, that exist. And I hope I'm not speaking over your head on this stuff. A lot of understanding of this comes from looking at some of the very, very old writings that we can find from the alchemists, from the hermeticists, from those who have practiced... these philosophical ways of thinking, and have understood that we have these various planes of existence, layers of manifestation that exist, and it's a stepping down process from this zero point to the dense physical chemical region here that takes place. And it goes through these different progressions of movements from the plane of counter space, if you want to call it that. And I hope I'm making sense I would highly suggest, for anybody who might be lost on some of this, pick up a book by one Mr. Max Heindel called The Rosicrucian Cosmo Conception. Read it cover to cover. It lays down some very important ideas, and you'll likely need to read it multiple times in order to comprehend it, and go back and study some of the things that he talks about there, because this gives a very... fundamental blueprint of these different planes of existence, these layers of manifestation of motion from the other side, from counter space, from the focal point, the mind. And it's a stepping down process through these various layers or planes of existence into physical manifestation here. And it's understanding that this is a process. It's not instantaneous. It's a process. First, there's an idea that occurs or an ideal that emerges in the world of mind. And then it goes through designing phases and planning phases. A good analogy we could offer is maybe if you're going to build a house. And I think I've offered this analogy before in the past. I've heard it analogized this way by others. You have an architect. He wants to build a house. So the idea of the house first emerges where? In his mind. He pictures it in his mind's eye. He has a conception of what he would like for it to look like and how he would like it to be. So his next step in actually building this house would be to take this picture he has in his mind and put it into a two-dimensional blueprint. So he puts down this two-dimensional blueprint on paper, and then from this two-dimensional blueprint, he works, and maybe he builds a small-scale model of the house. And when he does so, he finds out some things he had originally pictured in his mind won't work in physical reality here. Looks good on paper, but doesn't work in reality. So then he does a redesign. Draws up a new blueprint. builds a new model. Now this model looks much better, much different. He had to make some changes to that model. Then from this model, he decides he's going to go ahead and build the actual house. So what does he need to do then? He takes his blueprint that he developed this model from, to the construction company. He gets a group of workers to actually put in the work and build the frame and the foundation of the house. And now he's dependent upon these others to be able to picture that which he had imagined and try to make it reality. Well, lo and behold, when they finish building the house, it has the same overall design or framework as or archetype to it. But it doesn't turn out exactly how he envisioned it in his mind originally. It's not the ideal or the idea. This is the nature of manifestation here in the dense physical region of reality as we know it. The idea is the true reality. This is a limited facsimile of that. Now, Russell described this as a simulation. I don't think you could take him literally as that. It's kind of a holographic projection of that. A limited projection of what the ideal stands for. The ideal is the reality. And this is but an illusion. After all, life is but a dream. Didn't they tell us that in the nursery rhyme? Row, row, row your boat gently down the stream. You could learn a lot from nursery rhymes, and perhaps I'll do a series on nursery rhymes, because there's a lot to unpack there. But you see, this world of manifestation in the dense physical reality that we experience is a limited reflection of the ideal in the mind's eye. from the spiritual side of things. It is a much less perfected version of that. So I hope that little analogy and lesson there helps you to better envision this. It's a stepping down process into manifestation that occurs for all things, and it's all derived on the nature of consciousness itself. You take consciousness out of the picture, there can be no forms. There will be no forms. Because there's no ideal. If there's no consciousness, there's no thought, there's no mind, there's no idea. And therefore, no reflection appears through the ether into the physical dense region here. No form will manifest. No matter will be created. No motion will take place. Thought is motion. The mind is knowing. There's knowing and there's thinking. Thinking is the motion. Thinking occurs on this side of reality. Knowing occurs on the spiritual side of reality. When you are there, when you are unified back with source, with your creator on the other side, you have primordial knowing. You know. Thinking does not occur there. Thinking only occurs here. It's the active principle and the passive principle, once again. Anyway, I hope I'm making sense. So anyway, let's get back to what Russell's telling us here. So he says, Now remember, he said, Now, it expands into space. It borns radiation. It discharges by dividing high potential into low and heat into cold. I'm going to pause for a moment. So now it's the opposite. So now if you want to picture this in your mind, the correspondence between these two ways of thinking, the decentrative and the concentrative, it can be best expressed by looking in terms of the electromagnetic spectrum, electromagnetic fields. and this pull towards the zero point, or towards counter space, and this expulsion from counter space. This would be the black hole and the white hole, as it's been described as well. Or it would be the geometry of the toroid and the hourglass shape, this compound dual geometric shape. So things either move towards counter space or away from counter space. When you understand that, things begin to take on a more understandable form. Then you understand the shape, the geometric shape of the torus and why things, when they manifest, the circle, the sphere, or some close proximity thereto seem to be forms that are common. Look at the apple. The energy of the apple is in the seed in the center. This is a perfect example. The apple is more or less roundish. It is more or less a torus shape, a toroid shape. And the potential is in the seed in the center. Now that potential, when taken out of the apple and the seed is planted, that potential becomes manifest in the physical here. It becomes expressed in that way, and it grows a new tree. That potential represents counter space or zero point, the seed. And the apple represents manifestation, or the apple tree represents manifestation. And the apple itself, the shape of the fruit, represents this attempt of physical matter to unify itself once again back with counter space I hope it makes sense it's an analogy that we could look at and I've heard other people maybe use that analogy a little bit to explain this difference between the potential and the actual kinetic materialization that we can see expressed in forms of electromagnetic spectrum phenomena Anyway, it explains all things. It goes beyond just electromagnetic phenomena, beyond physics, beyond all of that. It's an expression of consciousness. It's an expression of mind. All creation is an expression of mind. And we see how Russell lays this down in a way that's understandable. So let's continue before we wrap it up here very soon. So... Russell continues, and he says, All motion is a continuous two-way journey in opposite directions between two destinations. One destination is the apex of a cone in an incandescent center of gravity. At this point, motion comes to rest and reverses its direction. The other destination is the base of a cone encircling a cold, evacuated center of radiation. At this point of motion, again, comes to rest and reverses its direction from centrifugal to centripetal. going to pause for a moment. So now we see here the terms of what Russell is expressing. Now this would look like two cones with the points of the cones connected at the center. An hourglass-like shape, the hyperboloid. This is the corresponding geometry to the torus, which represents the other pole of that polarity the other outward expression from potential to manifestation. Now, he describes it in terms of an hourglass. The motion goes towards the center, and then once it gets to the center, expulsion takes place from the center to the other side. It's the same kind of thing. Now, picture this circling back in on itself. This is where the torus shape comes in, if you're looking at three-dimensional manifestation in that way. So I hope that makes sense to you. Be easier with diagrams. And Russell provides diagrams in his books. So I hope that's helpful. You can find a lot of Walter Russell's works out there still. Let's continue on. So Russell continues. He says, So long as the creator's mind divides his knowing by his thinking just so long, will that two-way motion continue its sequences of cycles to record God's imaginings in forms of his imaginings. God being eternal, likewise, his universe is eternal. The belief of science that the universe had a beginning in some past remote period, as the result of some generalization, cataclysm and will come to an end in some future remote period is due to not knowing that waves of motion are the thought waves of the universal thinker. Gonna pause for a moment here. So what Russell's saying in essence is that the Big Bang Theory is nonsense. Can't ever have happened for much the same reason I expressed earlier. First of all, there is no such thing as nothing. Nothing in and of itself can't exist. The very term nothing denotes an actual something. So therefore, there's no such conceptual observation of nothing. So it can't exist to begin with. So how can that explode and become everything? This is the problem. There's not some ultimate cataclysm coming that will totally destroy everything either. Now there are cycles of time and there are cataclysmic things that happen that offer as a type of reset point, but there's always a remnant that remains. Now see, if there was a true cataclysm of this sort that completely wiped out everything back into a state of nothingness which can't exist, and then reemerge on the other side as everything again, then this in and of itself, would not be able to occur in such a way. It doesn't exist. It's a misnomer of science, you see, and I hope that makes sense to you. None of this can exist without consciousness or mind being present, or some type of law, universal law of creation or manifestation, You cannot have laws, natural laws, without some kind of mind or consciousness or intelligence present. Do you get that? And yet we observably have laws of nature. We have theories of mind, but we have laws of nature, immutable laws of nature, that work how they work regardless of whether you want them to work or not or what you think of them. It works the same way all the time. The sun's going to rise tomorrow. The trees will bud in the springtime, and their leaves will fall off in the autumn. This goes on over and over again. There's a design inherent here. There's an intelligence. There's a mind present. There's consciousness present. All of these things happen how they happen. It is natural law. And you cannot change that. You can mess with it all you want, but it still operates how it operates. And the mere existence of these laws denotes an intelligence or a consciousness that underlies and undergirds everything. And to try to separate that from the reality and explain it away from the reality, you'll never have a true understanding of how things really work. What does this come down to? This comes down to essentially... The denialism of the existence of God by many of those mainstream scholars and academics and those thinkers out there in the realms of the sciences that try to explain away everything as some physical cause and effect sequence, you can't do it. The mere existence of natural laws requires that there is an inherent intelligence and a consciousness. Things would not manifest otherwise. You can do nothing otherwise. Man himself is not God, can never be God. Can you create something out of nothing? No, you have to work with what is already present here, what has been created by the Creator. You, inclusive, are created by the Creator. Your mind, inclusive, is created by the mind of the Creator. And therefore, in and of yourself, you cannot be God. There is no way. This is a misnomer of thinking within much of the occult and in much of the thoughts of secular humanism and atheism and all the other isms. Luciferianism, that you can be God, that you are little g God. Yes, we are created in the image of God and we do have some creative capacities and imaginative abilities of our own. And our mind can affect this creation effectively. But we cannot create our own creation. We cannot form something from nothing. Therefore, we are not God. We are not the source. We are not the one, as described here by Russell. And we can never be the one. So I hope that this gives a little more understanding Now, a lot within the New Age occults and the occult fraternities have taken this notion of the one, as talked here by Russell, and how it expresses into manifestation in polarities in this side of reality here, in physical reality. They've taken that concept and the things he said about how we are all part of the one And they've misconstrued that and turned that into, we are God. Man is God, or man can become God. And this is wherein a lot of our problems come from. Man, in his hubris, thinks that he could physically explain away all things in manifestation. He could explain away consciousness itself as a byproduct of the physical electrochemical activity of the brain and brainstem. And that to do so is the way that we move science forward and our understanding forward. This is the hypermaterialist paradigm. This is the world of shells. This is the world of dead entities. It's the reign of dead matter. It is form, devoid spirit, and it cannot exist. Form cannot exist without spirit. Mind is the connection point between spirit and form. One cannot exist without the other. Now this creates a dilemma. If these dark occultists who run things and their minions, the technocrats that are running around here trying to build this transhumanist world, this digital world devoid of spirit, This causes a very serious problem because natural law requires that you cannot have form without spirit. So what does that mean? Something will fill the void. Now what is that? Probably some intelligence, entity, spirit, however you want to define it, force, that does not belong here. an unnatural, synthetic thing that does not belong here. This is the danger of transhumanism. This is the danger of artificial intelligence. This is, in effect, what Rudolf Steiner described as the spirit of Ahriman, this advancement and building of this world of shells as described by the Hermeticists. this seeking to create form devoid of spirit, well, something's going to fill that vacuum. There's going to be a spirit that steps in or walks in because it cannot manifest without spirit. That's one of the big secrets that they would prefer you not know. Therefore, when they're talking about things like Everything has a type of spirit to it. Even inanimate objects like rocks and natural things like that, they all have some type of a spirit to it. They're not incorrect. Now, it may not be a conscious spirit that manifests in that way of sorts that we would understand, but it is a spirit nonetheless. It may not have that connection point to mind in the same way that we do or that we understand it, but it has to be present. So the whole point here is without this notion of mind or consciousness, the whole point of matter is moot. It's nothing but a reflection of the spirit. This physical world is a reflection of the spirit world. The spirit world is the ideal world. It is the true world. And this is a reflection of that. This is an illusion. That's why many of the spiritists of old would say that this world's an illusion. This reality's an illusion. Life is but a dream, as we've talked about. But let's go ahead. Let's continue reading from Russell's words here before we close it out. Also, the belief of science that the universe is dying a heat death by the expansion of suns is due to not knowing that there are as many black evacuated holes in space for the reborning of suns as there are compressed suns for the reborning of evacuated black holes. Together, the interchange between these two conditions constitutes the heartbeat of the universe, and they are equal. Being equal, they are balanced and continuous eternally. The journey towards gravity simulates life, and the opposite journey simulates death in the forever repeating cycles which together in their continuity simulate eternal life. If two opposite pressure conditions which control the life-death cycles of all bodies are 1. The negative condition of expansion which thrusts outward, radially and spirally from a centering zero of rest to form the low potential condition which constitutes space, And number two, the positive condition of compression which thrusts inward toward a centering zero of rest to form the compressed condition of gravity which generates forming bodies into solids surrounded by space. I'm going to pause for a moment. So now Russell is very much describing some of the same things we've talked about here in the past in regards to physics, to field theory, to the true nature. of manifestation to the true definition of what exactly is gravity what exactly is manifestation here the formation of matter what is matter what is energy well it's all this vibrating condition at various rates into creating form and the breaking down of form back into potentiality again breaking back into counter space moving towards counterspace, and then moving outward from counterspace back into physical manifestation in a never-ending cyclical pattern. Think in terms of the electromagnetic, think of a black hole, the correlation, the correspondence, the analogy we gave earlier of a black hole, and what you would call a white hole. The black hole... It sucks everything in towards counter space. The white hole expels light or energy outwards from itself to create matter. They're opposite opposing conditions and they work simultaneously together. That's how Walter Russell is describing it here. And it goes on ad nauseum for eternity and it creates balance. It's pressure mediation in its most basic form. When you think about that, it's a pressure system. That's all it is. That's all the manifestation of matter and energy and everything we experience here in this physical reality is. It's pressure mediation between the spiritual world or the invisible world and the physical world that we see here. And there's a contingent point in space that connects the two, and this is mind. And consciousness mediates this. Let's read on. Desire of mind expresses its desire through the electric process of thinking. Thinking divides idea into pairs of oppositely conditioned units of motion, which record a simulation of idea into thought forms. I'm going to pause for a moment. So thought forms are one of the precursory things that lead into ultimate physical manifestation, as we demonstrated with the analogy earlier of the building of a house. Let's continue. Sir James Jeans has suggested the possibility that matter might be proven to be pure thought. Matter is not even pure thought, but it is the electric record of thought. Every electric wave is a recording instrument which is forever recording the form of thought in wave fields of matter. All thought waves created anywhere in any wave field become universal by repeating them everywhere. Thought waves of expanded and compressed states of motion are fashioned into moving patterns which simulate the forms of the creator's imaginings. All formed bodies thus created are made in his image. This division of the undivided light and its extension into oppositely conditioned states of motion is the basis of the universal heartbeat of pulsing thought waves, which seemingly divide the one whole idea into many ones. Interchange between oppositely conditioned pairs of thought recording units is expressed in waves of motion. This is a thought wave universe. Thought waves are reproduced throughout the universe at a speed of 186,000 miles per second, and I'm going to pause for a moment here. This is another portion where I think Russell got it wrong. He's giving it the speed of light, but I think it's more instantaneous than that. Thought waves, these thought waves travel much more instantaneously than that. I think he was trying to relate it to the speed of light because of the nature of light becoming manifest as matter in this way. But light does not have a speed. It has a rate of induction. That is the true nature of what this really is. It doesn't have a speed per se. It can be perceived as such by man in his finite, limited knowledge, but when you look at it, it essentially is not the universal speed limit, as science would have you believe. They've been able to break the speed of light using particle accelerators and things like that. They have now recorded things can travel faster than the speed of light. They once thought that was impossible, and now We see how scalar wave technologies and stuff can also exceed the speed of light in the transmission of data, and the property they call quantum entanglement does so as well. It exceeds the speed of light, and it makes the whole point of the speed of light entirely moot. This is a rate of induction. That's what that is. But I think Walter Russell, in trying to reify this with the science of the time, had to adopt that into his conception here. And I think it's a misnomer. I think thought, the rate of thought, the travel of thought, is more instantaneous than the speed of light. I don't know if you could accurately measure the speed of thought. How fast does a thought travel? How would you measure that? How would you conceptualize that? How would you quantify that? How fast does a thought travel? You can only maybe record the speed of an electrical impulse from your brain to some other portion of your body and back. And they've calculated that. But that's not the speed of a thought. This is something you can't measure. Think about that. So I think maybe this is a misconception or a misdescription, I should say, by Russell here. It is commonly believed that the incandescence of suns is light. Incandescence simulates light in this cinema universe of macrocosmic make-believe, but incandescence is not light. It is but motion. Incandescence is merely the compressed half of the one divided pair of opposite conditions which constitutes matter and space. The black vacuity of cold space constitutes the expanded half. Together, these two are as much mates as male and female are mates. Each is equally essential to the other. Each finds balance in the other by voiding each other's unbalance. Going to pause for a moment here. So now he's making the distinction between light and what he calls incandescence, or what could be called illumination. Illumination. Light and illumination. like the fire and the flame. We've talked about this before. One being the invisible portion, one being the visible portion, or the attribution of the principle. The principle and the attribution. These two conditions and directions of compression and expansion are necessary for the two-way interchange of motion, which performs the work of integrating and disintegrating the living-dying cycle of opposed motion, which this electric universe is. The inconvenience. of compressed matter and the black vacuity of expanded matter are the two opposite polar ends of nature's bar magnet. Nature does not make her bar magnets in the form of cylinders as man does. She makes them in the form of cones. In this radial universe, no other form of motion than the spiral form of cones is possible. Going to pause for a moment. The spiral, the torus, and the hyperboloid. The conjugation of these two geometric forms is what he's describing here, the cone. In a spiral, you can look around at the geometry of formations of matter in this reality, especially life forms, you see the symmetry always present. You could look at a snail's shell. You could look at a starfish. You could look at various other things that display this radial symmetry that express this perfectly proportioned ratio in their form. to see an example of this. The spiral symmetry. This means that the negative end of nature's magnet is tens of thousands of times larger in volume than the positive end, although the potentials of each are equal. It also means that the equilibrium plane which divides nature's magnet is curved, while the same plane in a cylindrical bar magnet is a flat plane of zero curvature. So I'm going to pause for a moment there. So now we can understand a little something more. Once again, we're talking about comparing the way magnetic fields work and corresponding that with how we see matter begin to manifest. There are two conditions which mirror one another. It's one and the same thing that's being described here. It all works according to the same pattern, the same symmetry. It's all the same ratios that are involved here with that. When you're speaking of manifestation, and it has everything to do with this emanation from the zero point, the mind, if you will, this connection to counter space, to the other side, to the spirit realms. And we see this as a reflection of the ideal. Matter, here below, is a reflection of the spiritual above. As I said, spirit and form cannot exist one without the other. And it's an interesting way of thinking. If they do exist one without the other, it's only for a very short time anyway. at that zero point, at that union, that juncture point, the mind. You see, as I was alluding to earlier, you can't have form. You can't have physical form here in this reality without some type of a spirit inherent, because this form is a reflection of that. And in order to maintain the balance, it has to be that way. So if there is a void to be filled on one side or the other, it will be filled to create this balance or to restore this balance when there is an imbalance. I hope That makes sense to you. It is pressure mediation, really, if you want to look at it as an analogy. It's all pressure mediation. It's all got to be at this state of equilibrium. And if it's not, it's all movement from one state to the other to create this equilibrium. And that is what we go through. We are in this world of motion. So therefore, things are always going to move and things are always going to change and that is the only constant in this reality. Change. Change will happen. Change occurs. Motion. Change is a type of motion. Motion and change is the nature of matter, of physicality, of energy, of all the workings of this universe. It's all One and the same. And it all is seeking that restoration, that balance point. Back at the center. At that conjunction point between spirit and form, the mind. So Walter Russell gives us a lot to think about. And he does compare this connection of consciousness and the existence of mind as the focal point here. with light, and describes it as light. And this is how many of the ancient occultists and alchemists and many of those of the old natural sciences decided was the best way to explain it, as light. Conditions of light and the equilibrium of light. Consciousness, light. Intertwined, interconnected. Mind at the center. The consubstantiation between spirit and form. That is what we have. And it's about this eternal balance. So Walter Russell understood some things, and he was able to demonstrate connections between our existence and forces that we know, like the electromagnetic spectrum. And how it all works the same. Essentially, if you understand one energy science, you understand all energy sciences. And this was expressed in a little document called Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars. If you understand the basic energy sciences, then you can understand all of them. If you understand one, you understand them all. You can apply these same theories to all of them. This is something that is known by those who wield power in this world and they use mathematics as a way of quantifying some of these possibilities and weaponizing them against us because to be the bookkeeper means that you are the one who understands the energy science and you can use it and they developed economics as one such energy science to control people And that is one of the things that lies at the heart of social engineering. What do economists do? They're social engineers. So we learned a lot here today. We've discussed a lot. And I think Walter Russell was pretty right on with many of his thoughts on this. And maybe he didn't express these things in the most clear concrete way I don't think any of us could really do so I don't think we give it justice our limited language and our finite human minds don't give it justice we can't describe it adequately for one another but I hope we came close and I hope this made you think and I hope you have a better appreciation for the nature of light and matter and consciousness and mind, and all of the things caught up in that. And you have a better understanding of the machinations of how this universe operates for real, and not just the ways in which man, in his hubris, has tried to reify his own conceptions of this in our modern science, in our modern physics. Anyway, folks, that is all the time we have for tonight. I want to thank you all for tuning in, and I'll remind you I appreciate each and every one of you. We'll catch you next time. Have a good one now. Thank you.