The Ethereal Hearth...

[00:00:00] Discover the amazing clinically proven health benefits of Original Tahitian Noni.

[00:00:05] Original Tahitian Noni includes powerful antioxidants, adaptogens, nutrients, and phytonutrients to naturally boost energy levels, immune system function, and overall health.

[00:00:15] Meticulously sourced from French Polynesia, this is the Original Superfruit, except no imitations.

[00:00:21] Original Tahitian Noni.

[00:00:23] Visit ATRHealth at AlchemicalTechRevolution.com and click on the Shop Here tab for more details.

[00:00:30] We lead the world in facing down a threat to decency and humanity.

[00:00:36] Last week, along with cocaine, what is it saying?

[00:00:39] It's more than one fall country.

[00:00:43] It is a big idea.

[00:00:44] It's because of oppression.

[00:00:46] A new role.

[00:00:54] For the faithful.

[00:00:56] You are listening to the Alchemical Tech Revolution, and I am your host, Wayne McRoy.

[00:01:27] Good evening, good morning, wherever you are around the world.

[00:01:30] Tonight, we're going to discuss this concept of the Ethereal Hearth.

[00:01:36] Well, the hearth is central in the home.

[00:01:39] Of course, you know this.

[00:01:41] This is a concept that predates our modern times.

[00:01:45] The hearth always being central in the home.

[00:01:49] Well, what is this notion of the Ethereal Hearth?

[00:01:53] Well, we're going to look back at the early history of radio broadcasting, and we're going

[00:01:59] to discover that in the early part of the 20th century, the radio became very central to

[00:02:08] many homes in not only America, but within the developed world.

[00:02:13] This became a centerpiece in the living rooms of people all across America and, of course,

[00:02:21] many other nations in the world.

[00:02:23] And this became one of the primary tools used not only to convey information in a relatively

[00:02:31] short time from place to place, but it also became one of the preeminent social engineering

[00:02:37] tools of modern times.

[00:02:40] And, of course, this was the precursor to the television.

[00:02:44] The television, the greatest mind control technology ever devised.

[00:02:49] But the radio certainly had its place, and it still has its place.

[00:02:53] As a medium, radio broadcasting is still very much important.

[00:02:58] In fact, that's what I'm doing right now.

[00:03:00] Were it not for this type of technology, I would not be able to convey information to you

[00:03:05] in the way that we do so.

[00:03:07] So it is a useful tool in many regards.

[00:03:11] The problem is it's been misused in the past by the social engineers and the dark occultists

[00:03:17] who run things in this world, who have misused and misapplied this technology in order to

[00:03:23] socially engineer the masses.

[00:03:25] Now, we always run into these same problematic themes across the board with the development

[00:03:31] of these technologies.

[00:03:32] And my view, of course, is these are tools.

[00:03:35] They can be used for good or they can be used for bad.

[00:03:38] And, of course, the early development of this was implemented by those who realized the potential

[00:03:45] to do bad things with it and capitalized upon that potential.

[00:03:51] And, of course, the rest is history, as they say.

[00:03:54] And we're going to explore that history.

[00:03:56] We're going to be reading into a book once again, and we've read from this book on some

[00:04:02] previous episodes here.

[00:04:03] It's titled Media and the American Mind from Morse to McLuhan by Daniel J. Sitzrom.

[00:04:10] Now, this is actually a very good book.

[00:04:13] It gives you a good factual fact-based history of the development of various things.

[00:04:19] And we did an episode prior about the motion picture industry.

[00:04:25] And this, of course, came into fruition prior to the mass adoption of the radio in the homes

[00:04:33] of the Americans.

[00:04:35] But you'll see there's some esoteric types of crossovers here when we're talking about

[00:04:39] the radio as the ethereal hearth.

[00:04:42] Now, this has been replaced in modern times by a new form of this ethereal hearth.

[00:04:50] And I would say, by and large, in the latter part of the 20th century and, of course, the

[00:04:56] beginning part of the 21st century, the ethereal hearth that at one time the radio filled the

[00:05:02] position of has now been filled by the television.

[00:05:05] And I would say in the more recent near past, it's being replaced by computers and or screens,

[00:05:17] computer screens of sorts.

[00:05:19] The internet could be said to be the ethereal hearth of modern times.

[00:05:24] But we'll see how this takes on a type of esoteric connotation.

[00:05:29] Because when you think about the hearth, you think about this notion of warmth and centrality

[00:05:37] to the home.

[00:05:39] It's central to family, the family unit.

[00:05:43] And they've, of course, replaced the hearth with something different at this point.

[00:05:48] It's not something that necessarily brings about this feeling of warmth or community or companionship

[00:05:56] or love.

[00:05:57] These types of ideas have now been replaced by this synthetic device.

[00:06:03] And, of course, in the early part of the 20th century, this would be the radio.

[00:06:07] And the latter part would be the television.

[00:06:09] And like I said, now it seems to be shifting more towards the computer being central to the

[00:06:16] home.

[00:06:17] And, of course, this takes away the notion of human contact.

[00:06:21] Once again, you can see how these subtle social engineering agendas are playing out.

[00:06:26] And the subtle occult types of connotations play out with this, if you could connect the

[00:06:32] dots there.

[00:06:33] So, certainly, we see that this notion of the ethereal hearth has become an important part

[00:06:40] of social engineering the masses in the modern era.

[00:06:43] And this has its roots with the advent of radio broadcasting.

[00:06:48] And we're going to get into that right now as we read from this book.

[00:06:52] And I find it compelling.

[00:06:53] And this is where I got the title.

[00:06:54] It's actually from chapter 3 of this book, where it talks about the ethereal hearth, American

[00:07:00] radio from wireless through broadcasting.

[00:07:02] From the years 1892 to 1940.

[00:07:06] The development of the telegraph and the motion picture proceeded in a relatively straight

[00:07:11] historical line.

[00:07:12] Pioneers in the creation of those two media struggled to find technological solutions to

[00:07:18] specific problems.

[00:07:19] The transmission of intelligence using coded electrical impulses through wires and the perfection

[00:07:25] of projected motion photography.

[00:07:27] Early in their history, the implications those media held for prevailing notions of communication

[00:07:33] and culture seemed startling.

[00:07:35] And I'm going to pause there.

[00:07:37] So, we had these inventions, motion pictures.

[00:07:41] Of course, we did a prior episode on the advent of the motion picture and how it influenced the

[00:07:49] world and changed the world in very many ways.

[00:07:51] And now we're talking about ways that these inventions, this along with the telegraph and other things,

[00:07:58] began to give credence to the possibility of instantaneous or near instantaneous communications

[00:08:03] across very long distances.

[00:08:07] So, this is an important concept to keep in mind.

[00:08:11] They seem to think that this had potential for other types of uses.

[00:08:18] And, of course, early on in the development phases of this, it was recognized by what would later

[00:08:25] become the military-industrial complex that this could be weaponized.

[00:08:30] So, now we're getting into the crux of the matter here.

[00:08:34] Radio broadcasting added a totally new dimension to modern communication by bringing the outside

[00:08:39] world into the individual home.

[00:08:42] The history of radio, however, was far more complex than the histories of the previous media

[00:08:47] breakthroughs which we just discussed.

[00:08:49] Motion pictures and a telegraph, that would be.

[00:08:52] The broadcasting system tied together a bundle of technological and scientific threads

[00:08:57] that had been dangling for a generation.

[00:09:00] It thus makes sense to distinguish wireless technology up to and including World War I

[00:09:06] from the later system of radio broadcasting.

[00:09:09] Wireless technology presumed a far higher level of scientific knowledge,

[00:09:13] particularly in mathematics and physics, than that required by previous advances in communication.

[00:09:20] Although individual experimenters around the world contributed to wireless progress,

[00:09:25] it ultimately achieved technological sophistication through the research performed and coordinated

[00:09:31] by science-based industry and the military.

[00:09:35] And I'm going to pause for a moment there.

[00:09:37] And there is the big connection.

[00:09:40] The military, they recognized the potential uses this could have on the battlefield

[00:09:47] or for the battlefield, for the greater war effort.

[00:09:51] And of course, the early, early advent of what would later become the military-industrial complex

[00:10:00] began to capitalize on this.

[00:10:03] And they were the ones that were most interested in figuring out how to use this wireless technology

[00:10:09] for themselves in order to achieve certain purposes.

[00:10:13] And of course, like everything else, this turns out to be a dual-use technology,

[00:10:19] first perfected for all its military applications,

[00:10:22] and then unleashed to the public for commercial use.

[00:10:26] So we have this going on in the early part of the 20th century,

[00:10:30] just prior to World War I, up to and including World War I,

[00:10:34] where they were figuring out how to use radio broadcasting in various different ways.

[00:10:39] They recognized the potential for this wireless technology.

[00:10:44] And certainly, the advent of things like the telegraph,

[00:10:47] this was hugely, monumentally changing of the way communication happened.

[00:10:55] So they used this in many ways, and it did transform the world in a lot of ways.

[00:11:03] But it was limited in its usage because, you see, you needed a wire

[00:11:07] in order to transmit information in that way.

[00:11:10] Whereas this newer technology of radio broadcasting,

[00:11:14] it introduced the idea of wireless communication.

[00:11:18] You didn't need this wire.

[00:11:20] It was far less limiting than the telegraph.

[00:11:23] So they decided to focus their attention and their resources

[00:11:27] into developing this technology.

[00:11:30] Radio broadcasting began as a marketing tool,

[00:11:34] a service designed by large electrical equipment manufacturers

[00:11:37] to sell privately owned receivers.

[00:11:40] The enormous potential of radio broadcasting

[00:11:42] for improving the quality of daily life,

[00:11:45] its ubiquitous power to bring art, entertainment, music, education,

[00:11:48] and news into the living room contained severe contradictions.

[00:11:53] I'm going to pause for a moment.

[00:11:55] So it was introduced first as a marketing tool.

[00:12:00] A marketing tool.

[00:12:01] Now the very beginning phases of the military industrial complex

[00:12:07] took notice of this and decided they were going to try

[00:12:11] to develop these technologies themselves for other uses,

[00:12:15] militaristic uses.

[00:12:17] And we have this different dichotomy of thought.

[00:12:20] But here it says here that it was begun for marketing purposes

[00:12:25] for things like the dissemination of entertainment,

[00:12:27] music, education, and news into the living rooms of people all around the world.

[00:12:32] It was a transformative tool.

[00:12:35] It brought information to people in a way that otherwise would not be available.

[00:12:41] And it became a replacement of sorts for a lot of the print media

[00:12:47] after it really had taken hold.

[00:12:50] Let's continue here though.

[00:12:52] It says, because it's talking about some of the contradictions

[00:12:55] that were contained in this advent of putting a radio in every living room.

[00:13:01] With radio broadcasting, wireless technology went public in the privacy of the home.

[00:13:06] But if the ownership of receivers promised to be democratic,

[00:13:10] what of the control of transmission?

[00:13:12] During the 1920s, debate over radio's future centered on the question of structure and finance.

[00:13:17] Would the electrical interests supply the service indefinitely?

[00:13:22] If not, who would pay for it and how would it be regulated?

[00:13:26] By the onset of the Great Depression,

[00:13:28] advertising had established itself as the basis for American broadcasting.

[00:13:33] Critics wondered about the hidden social costs of free broadcasting

[00:13:36] paid for by commercial sponsors.

[00:13:38] Meanwhile, with its newfound stability,

[00:13:41] radio programming regularly featured hybrid combinations

[00:13:44] of traditional entertainment and news forms.

[00:13:47] And I'm going to pause for a moment.

[00:13:49] So the early uses of radio

[00:13:52] were primarily for military purposes

[00:13:58] prior to World War I.

[00:14:00] But then the full-on commercialization of it came out

[00:14:03] directly after World War I.

[00:14:06] And in the 1920s, they began to figure out

[00:14:08] who's going to foot the bill for this?

[00:14:12] How are we going to do this?

[00:14:13] Who's going to be the broadcaster, per se?

[00:14:17] Who's going to take charge of that?

[00:14:19] Is it the electrical companies?

[00:14:21] Who's going to do it?

[00:14:23] And wouldn't you know,

[00:14:25] the industry itself decided

[00:14:28] how this would be done

[00:14:30] and how it would be paid for.

[00:14:32] And primarily, it was paid for

[00:14:35] by commercials.

[00:14:37] Commercial sponsorship.

[00:14:39] So companies would pay money

[00:14:41] to have an advertisement

[00:14:43] for their product and or service

[00:14:45] come over this new form of media

[00:14:47] to people for them to hear.

[00:14:50] And this would supply much of the monies

[00:14:52] that would prop up the infrastructure

[00:14:54] for broadcasting.

[00:14:55] And we have these different hybrid combinations

[00:14:58] which came forward from that.

[00:15:00] So in the beginning phases,

[00:15:01] it would seem the electrical companies

[00:15:03] and those who were supplying the infrastructure

[00:15:07] and perhaps building the radio sets themselves

[00:15:09] were the ones

[00:15:12] who were perhaps controlling

[00:15:15] the broadcasting at that point.

[00:15:17] But then, of course, like everything else,

[00:15:22] you have to get government involved

[00:15:25] at some point, right?

[00:15:26] And that's exactly what happened.

[00:15:28] It was all about

[00:15:29] who's going to regulate this?

[00:15:30] What kind of regulations

[00:15:31] are we going to have?

[00:15:32] Of who's going to foot the bill?

[00:15:35] Who's going to be in charge of broadcasting?

[00:15:38] And I think this was

[00:15:40] a hotly debated topic at the time

[00:15:43] because who were the commercial interests

[00:15:45] who were broadcasting on the radio?

[00:15:49] You see, it was kind of like

[00:15:50] the Wild West at that point.

[00:15:52] There were all kinds of different people

[00:15:55] who, if they had the technology to do so,

[00:15:58] if they had the devices to do so,

[00:16:01] they could broadcast or transmit

[00:16:03] radio signals themselves

[00:16:04] to be received on certain frequency bands.

[00:16:07] And there was little regulation

[00:16:10] in place at the time.

[00:16:12] Nobody necessarily owned

[00:16:14] any particular radio band

[00:16:15] or network or anything of the sort.

[00:16:17] So this is wherein everything began

[00:16:20] to really full sail roll out

[00:16:23] for consumer use.

[00:16:26] And of course, an entire industry

[00:16:28] arose around this,

[00:16:29] a broadcast industry

[00:16:32] complete with regulatory rules

[00:16:37] and agreements.

[00:16:39] So this is what was established

[00:16:41] in the 1920s.

[00:16:42] So by the time the Great Depression

[00:16:44] rolled around,

[00:16:45] advertising was established

[00:16:46] as the basis for the funding

[00:16:49] of American broadcasting.

[00:16:50] And it does say

[00:16:52] that the commercial sponsors

[00:16:56] were pretty much the ones

[00:16:58] footing the bill,

[00:16:59] but were they the ones broadcasting?

[00:17:00] Let's see if we could garner

[00:17:01] some other information here.

[00:17:03] Looking backward,

[00:17:05] quite a few of the contemporary appraisals

[00:17:06] of wireless technology

[00:17:08] and radio broadcasting

[00:17:09] strike us as rather quixotic.

[00:17:11] This is in part because

[00:17:12] today's broadcasting media

[00:17:14] continually propound the idea

[00:17:16] that their current configuration

[00:17:17] is the only one possible.

[00:17:19] But the range of opinions

[00:17:21] on wireless technology's significance

[00:17:23] and the variety of proposals

[00:17:24] for the organization

[00:17:25] of radio broadcasting

[00:17:26] remind us that the present

[00:17:29] incarnation of broadcast media

[00:17:30] need not be permanent.

[00:17:32] And I'm going to pause

[00:17:33] for a moment.

[00:17:33] And this is a massively

[00:17:35] important idea

[00:17:36] that does affect us

[00:17:38] in the modern times.

[00:17:39] Just because they have

[00:17:42] their systems set up right now

[00:17:44] doesn't mean it has to still

[00:17:46] always remain that way.

[00:17:48] You see, there's always

[00:17:50] new incarnations of this

[00:17:51] cropping up.

[00:17:52] Like right now,

[00:17:53] I'm broadcasting right now

[00:17:56] live from my basement,

[00:17:58] from my little studio

[00:17:59] in my basement.

[00:18:01] And people are hearing this.

[00:18:04] And this is a different type

[00:18:05] of broadcasting

[00:18:06] from what the regular structure is.

[00:18:08] I'm not on a particular

[00:18:11] affiliated radio network

[00:18:12] or some cable news network

[00:18:16] or some such thing

[00:18:17] or a broadcast news media channel

[00:18:19] or anything like that.

[00:18:20] I'm not on a mainstream channel

[00:18:23] that turns up on the radio,

[00:18:26] the terrestrial radio,

[00:18:28] or on the televisions.

[00:18:31] And of course,

[00:18:32] the regulatory process

[00:18:34] for all of this

[00:18:35] and the infrastructure

[00:18:37] was laid out

[00:18:38] and put in place

[00:18:38] starting in the 1920s.

[00:18:40] And we have the current

[00:18:41] iteration of it today.

[00:18:42] that we have now,

[00:18:43] that's largely accepted.

[00:18:44] But there are new ways

[00:18:46] of doing things

[00:18:46] and many technologies

[00:18:48] have been developed

[00:18:49] and will continue

[00:18:50] to be developed

[00:18:50] that make it possible

[00:18:51] to do things differently.

[00:18:53] And thus,

[00:18:54] it makes it harder

[00:18:56] for the regulators

[00:18:57] to impose restrictions

[00:19:00] and rules

[00:19:01] upon certain types

[00:19:04] of broadcast media.

[00:19:05] So here I am,

[00:19:07] as long as I have

[00:19:07] an internet connection

[00:19:08] and you have

[00:19:09] an internet connection,

[00:19:09] I can broadcast

[00:19:10] and you can hear this.

[00:19:12] And we also have,

[00:19:14] of course,

[00:19:15] all the prerequisite

[00:19:16] recording software

[00:19:17] and everything

[00:19:18] that goes with it today.

[00:19:19] So this can continue

[00:19:20] to be replayed

[00:19:21] over and over again

[00:19:22] and heard by many,

[00:19:24] many people.

[00:19:24] Whereas in the past,

[00:19:26] something like this

[00:19:26] would not have been feasible.

[00:19:28] You would have to have

[00:19:30] the proper studio equipment,

[00:19:33] which in the early days

[00:19:34] of radio was likely

[00:19:35] a lot more expensive

[00:19:36] and elaborate

[00:19:37] and you would have to have

[00:19:38] the proper way

[00:19:39] to do that.

[00:19:41] So it wasn't something

[00:19:42] that was accessible

[00:19:43] to most people.

[00:19:44] Now with our modern technology,

[00:19:46] this is more accessible

[00:19:47] than ever for people.

[00:19:48] And I would say radio,

[00:19:50] as a broadcast media form,

[00:19:53] still has unlimited potential.

[00:19:56] You would have thought

[00:19:58] in the era

[00:20:00] of digital film

[00:20:02] and digital media

[00:20:05] that radio

[00:20:07] would have disappeared.

[00:20:08] You would think so,

[00:20:10] wouldn't you?

[00:20:11] But there's always

[00:20:12] been a market for it.

[00:20:16] Now with motion pictures,

[00:20:19] of course,

[00:20:19] as we've stated earlier,

[00:20:21] and digital media

[00:20:22] and things of that nature,

[00:20:23] it probably has put

[00:20:25] a little bit of pinch

[00:20:26] on the overall

[00:20:27] radio industry itself.

[00:20:29] But certainly,

[00:20:30] people are listening

[00:20:32] to programs like this

[00:20:33] more now than ever before.

[00:20:35] With the invention

[00:20:36] of podcasting

[00:20:37] and everything

[00:20:38] that goes along with that,

[00:20:40] it made it more accessible

[00:20:42] for more people,

[00:20:43] more voices to be heard,

[00:20:45] more content

[00:20:47] for people to hear

[00:20:49] rather than content

[00:20:50] just put out there

[00:20:51] through the approved

[00:20:53] channels that existed

[00:20:55] at one point

[00:20:56] through the terrestrial

[00:20:57] radio stations,

[00:20:58] which are largely owned

[00:20:59] by major corporations,

[00:21:01] same thing with

[00:21:01] the television stations

[00:21:02] and all of that,

[00:21:04] centralized control

[00:21:04] of media.

[00:21:06] And we still have that

[00:21:07] to some degree today,

[00:21:09] but now we have

[00:21:10] these independent platforms

[00:21:12] that make it possible

[00:21:13] for broadcasters

[00:21:14] like myself

[00:21:14] to go out there

[00:21:15] and do this.

[00:21:17] And this is an important

[00:21:18] thing to keep in mind,

[00:21:19] and this is what

[00:21:20] the author here

[00:21:21] was talking about,

[00:21:22] the current incarnation

[00:21:24] of broadcast media

[00:21:25] need not be permanent.

[00:21:27] And certainly,

[00:21:27] we're seeing shifts

[00:21:28] in the way things are done.

[00:21:30] And of course,

[00:21:31] the regulators

[00:21:31] are always trying

[00:21:32] to push back

[00:21:32] and figure out

[00:21:33] new ways

[00:21:34] to control this.

[00:21:38] And concurrently,

[00:21:39] with the regulators,

[00:21:41] you always have

[00:21:42] the advertisers.

[00:21:44] Because you see,

[00:21:44] this was established

[00:21:46] very early

[00:21:47] in the history

[00:21:48] of broadcast media,

[00:21:49] that the advertisers

[00:21:51] would foot

[00:21:52] the bill,

[00:21:53] the brunt

[00:21:54] of the bill

[00:21:55] to pay for all of this.

[00:21:57] And certainly,

[00:21:57] we have the same thing

[00:21:58] going on today.

[00:21:59] In fact,

[00:22:00] a lot of podcasters

[00:22:01] depend upon,

[00:22:02] of course,

[00:22:03] ad revenue

[00:22:05] to help pay

[00:22:07] for the costs

[00:22:08] of broadcasting.

[00:22:09] Now,

[00:22:11] I'm no different

[00:22:12] in that regard.

[00:22:14] I do get

[00:22:15] ad revenues

[00:22:16] from various places

[00:22:19] simply out of necessity.

[00:22:22] But by and large,

[00:22:24] you won't hear

[00:22:25] ads on this show

[00:22:26] aside from

[00:22:27] an introductory ad.

[00:22:28] Unless,

[00:22:29] of course,

[00:22:29] you're listening

[00:22:29] on certain platforms

[00:22:30] like YouTube.

[00:22:31] And they insert

[00:22:32] commercials in there,

[00:22:33] of course.

[00:22:34] And I do get

[00:22:36] a little bit of cash

[00:22:37] from them for that.

[00:22:38] Not nearly

[00:22:39] what it should be.

[00:22:41] YouTube does not pay

[00:22:42] anything near

[00:22:43] what the standard rate

[00:22:44] is per capita

[00:22:46] in the rest

[00:22:47] of the broadcasting industry

[00:22:49] for sure

[00:22:49] with their advertisements.

[00:22:50] But they have

[00:22:51] a type of monopoly

[00:22:52] on video hosting.

[00:22:54] And that's where

[00:22:55] in the modern era

[00:22:56] you arrive

[00:22:58] at some

[00:22:59] various problems

[00:23:00] in that regard.

[00:23:02] And this is one

[00:23:03] of the ways

[00:23:04] in which they

[00:23:04] centralize control

[00:23:06] and regulation

[00:23:07] of this type of thing.

[00:23:09] But that's

[00:23:10] an aside

[00:23:10] for another time.

[00:23:11] That's

[00:23:11] a topic

[00:23:12] to explore

[00:23:13] some other time.

[00:23:14] I want to get back

[00:23:15] to the notion here

[00:23:16] of how radio

[00:23:18] became a preeminent

[00:23:19] part of the

[00:23:21] American lifestyle.

[00:23:23] And of course

[00:23:23] how this

[00:23:25] over the course

[00:23:26] of time

[00:23:26] transformed

[00:23:28] into television

[00:23:30] being a cultural

[00:23:31] influence

[00:23:32] on the American people.

[00:23:34] Almost as soon

[00:23:35] as scientists

[00:23:35] perfected

[00:23:36] electromagnetic

[00:23:37] telegraphy,

[00:23:38] they began searching

[00:23:39] for ways

[00:23:40] to eliminate

[00:23:40] the wires.

[00:23:41] Both Steinhale

[00:23:43] in Germany

[00:23:43] and Morse

[00:23:44] in America

[00:23:45] demonstrated

[00:23:45] telegraphy

[00:23:46] by conduction

[00:23:47] using the earth

[00:23:48] or water

[00:23:49] as a return circuit

[00:23:50] early in telegraph

[00:23:51] history.

[00:23:52] Later,

[00:23:53] various experimenters

[00:23:54] successfully telegraphed

[00:23:55] by forms of induction.

[00:23:57] Using electrostatic

[00:23:59] induction

[00:23:59] whereby an electric

[00:24:00] charge

[00:24:01] in one conductor

[00:24:02] induces one

[00:24:03] in another nearby,

[00:24:05] Edison

[00:24:05] in 1885

[00:24:06] created a system

[00:24:07] allowing moving

[00:24:08] trains to

[00:24:09] utilize telegraph

[00:24:11] lines running

[00:24:12] parallel to the

[00:24:13] tracks without

[00:24:13] interfering with

[00:24:14] the normal message

[00:24:15] load sent over

[00:24:16] the wires.

[00:24:18] Edison's

[00:24:18] motograph,

[00:24:19] as it was called,

[00:24:20] tried briefly

[00:24:21] on railroad

[00:24:23] lines in the

[00:24:24] 1880s

[00:24:25] and it proved

[00:24:26] a scientific

[00:24:26] success but

[00:24:27] a commercial

[00:24:28] failure.

[00:24:29] Using

[00:24:30] electromagnetic

[00:24:31] induction

[00:24:32] in which an

[00:24:32] electric current

[00:24:33] in a wire

[00:24:34] while increasing

[00:24:35] or decreasing

[00:24:36] induces another

[00:24:37] current in its

[00:24:38] neighborhood.

[00:24:39] William Preece

[00:24:40] managed to send

[00:24:41] telegraphic

[00:24:42] messages over

[00:24:43] several miles

[00:24:44] of water.

[00:24:45] As chief

[00:24:45] engineer of the

[00:24:46] British Post Office,

[00:24:47] Preece conducted

[00:24:48] numerous experiments

[00:24:49] in the 1890s

[00:24:51] using parallel

[00:24:52] series of wires

[00:24:53] to maintain

[00:24:53] communication with

[00:24:54] islands inaccessible

[00:24:55] to the wire

[00:24:56] telegraph.

[00:24:57] And I'm going to

[00:24:58] pause for a moment.

[00:24:59] So early

[00:25:00] bids at

[00:25:02] communicating

[00:25:02] were utilizing

[00:25:04] telegraph technology

[00:25:05] and of course it

[00:25:06] had its limitations

[00:25:07] because it

[00:25:07] needed a

[00:25:09] wire or

[00:25:10] some type

[00:25:10] of a

[00:25:11] conductive

[00:25:11] medium

[00:25:13] to

[00:25:15] kind of

[00:25:16] how should

[00:25:17] we say

[00:25:17] piggyback

[00:25:18] the signal

[00:25:18] one to

[00:25:19] the other

[00:25:19] to the

[00:25:20] other

[00:25:20] a relay

[00:25:20] system

[00:25:21] of sorts.

[00:25:23] So it

[00:25:23] provided

[00:25:24] some limitations

[00:25:25] for communication

[00:25:26] so certainly

[00:25:27] a wireless

[00:25:28] method of this

[00:25:29] would be

[00:25:30] preferable

[00:25:30] wouldn't it?

[00:25:31] Despite all

[00:25:33] of this

[00:25:33] work

[00:25:34] none of the

[00:25:34] conductive

[00:25:35] or

[00:25:35] inductive

[00:25:36] methods

[00:25:37] of

[00:25:37] wireless

[00:25:37] telegraphy

[00:25:38] demonstrated

[00:25:39] clear potential.

[00:25:40] During the

[00:25:41] 1880s and

[00:25:41] 1890s nearly

[00:25:43] all researchers

[00:25:43] approached the

[00:25:44] problem as

[00:25:45] one of

[00:25:45] conquering

[00:25:46] water

[00:25:46] communication

[00:25:47] between

[00:25:48] ships

[00:25:48] between ship

[00:25:49] and shore

[00:25:49] or between

[00:25:50] islands.

[00:25:51] Edison's

[00:25:52] curious

[00:25:52] motograph

[00:25:53] was the

[00:25:53] exception.

[00:25:54] For use

[00:25:55] over water

[00:25:55] however

[00:25:56] neither

[00:25:56] inductive

[00:25:57] nor

[00:25:57] conductive

[00:25:58] telegraphy

[00:25:59] could even

[00:26:00] replace

[00:26:01] the

[00:26:01] foghorn.

[00:26:02] Most

[00:26:03] observers

[00:26:03] agreed

[00:26:04] with the

[00:26:04] prognosis

[00:26:05] of the

[00:26:05] Harvard

[00:26:05] engineer

[00:26:06] John

[00:26:06] Trowbridge

[00:26:07] who

[00:26:08] ended

[00:26:08] an

[00:26:08] 1892

[00:26:09] review

[00:26:10] of

[00:26:10] various

[00:26:10] plans

[00:26:11] for

[00:26:11] wireless

[00:26:11] telegraphy

[00:26:12] at sea

[00:26:12] by declaring

[00:26:13] quote

[00:26:14] telegraphing

[00:26:15] through

[00:26:15] the air

[00:26:16] without

[00:26:16] wires

[00:26:17] by means

[00:26:17] of

[00:26:17] electricity

[00:26:18] does

[00:26:19] not

[00:26:19] seem

[00:26:19] at

[00:26:19] present

[00:26:20] to

[00:26:20] have

[00:26:20] the

[00:26:21] element

[00:26:21] of

[00:26:21] practicality

[00:26:22] in it

[00:26:23] end

[00:26:23] quote

[00:26:23] to

[00:26:24] Trowbridge

[00:26:25] the

[00:26:25] question

[00:26:25] of

[00:26:26] wireless

[00:26:26] communication

[00:26:26] over

[00:26:27] land

[00:26:27] did

[00:26:28] not

[00:26:28] seem

[00:26:28] worth

[00:26:29] deliberating

[00:26:29] and it

[00:26:30] probably

[00:26:30] would

[00:26:31] never

[00:26:31] be

[00:26:32] used

[00:26:32] even

[00:26:32] if

[00:26:33] it

[00:26:33] were

[00:26:33] practicable

[00:26:34] according

[00:26:34] to

[00:26:35] Trowbridge

[00:26:35] the

[00:26:36] ultimate

[00:26:36] scientific

[00:26:37] foundation

[00:26:38] for

[00:26:38] wireless

[00:26:39] telegraphy

[00:26:39] came

[00:26:40] not from

[00:26:41] induction

[00:26:41] or

[00:26:42] conduction

[00:26:42] but from

[00:26:43] the concept

[00:26:44] of

[00:26:44] electromagnetic

[00:26:45] waves

[00:26:45] traveling

[00:26:46] through

[00:26:46] space

[00:26:47] university

[00:26:48] trained

[00:26:49] scientists

[00:26:49] largely

[00:26:50] in

[00:26:50] England

[00:26:51] and

[00:26:51] Germany

[00:26:51] pioneered

[00:26:52] in

[00:26:53] proving

[00:26:53] the

[00:26:53] existence

[00:26:54] and

[00:26:54] utility

[00:26:55] of

[00:26:55] these

[00:26:55] waves

[00:26:55] in

[00:26:56] the

[00:26:56] 1860s

[00:26:57] James

[00:26:58] Clerk

[00:26:58] Maxwell

[00:26:58] one of

[00:26:59] the

[00:26:59] great

[00:26:59] theoretical

[00:27:00] physicists

[00:27:00] of

[00:27:00] the

[00:27:01] century

[00:27:01] mathematically

[00:27:02] predicted

[00:27:03] the

[00:27:03] existence

[00:27:04] of

[00:27:04] electromagnetic

[00:27:05] waves

[00:27:06] in

[00:27:06] the

[00:27:06] ether

[00:27:07] going to

[00:27:07] pause

[00:27:08] for a

[00:27:08] moment

[00:27:08] here

[00:27:09] folks

[00:27:09] that's

[00:27:10] right

[00:27:10] in

[00:27:10] the

[00:27:11] ether

[00:27:41] rebels

[00:27:43] seems

[00:27:44] to嗨

[00:27:47] throughout all

[00:27:48] time

[00:27:50] and

[00:27:50] study

[00:27:51] if

[00:27:51] you

[00:27:51] go back

[00:27:51] in the

[00:27:52] old natural

[00:27:52] sciences

[00:27:53] hermetic

[00:27:53] sciences

[00:27:54] it's an

[00:27:55] acknowledged

[00:27:55] feature of our

[00:27:56] reality

[00:27:57] the

[00:27:57] ether this

[00:27:58] is

[00:27:58] the

[00:27:58] substrate

[00:27:59] on which

[00:27:59] all

[00:28:00] of

[00:28:00] our physical

[00:28:01] manifestation

[00:28:01] exists

[00:28:02] You see, Tesla told us to think in terms like this, that light is nothing more than a sound wave in the ether.

[00:28:13] So we need to understand the correlation between light and sound.

[00:28:18] They're both electromagnetic frequency bands.

[00:28:22] One has a different medium than the other.

[00:28:24] The medium of sound travels through the air, while the medium of light travels through the ether.

[00:28:31] That's why light can traverse a vacuum.

[00:28:35] Because there's something else. It requires a medium.

[00:28:39] If there is a waveform that can travel, or I don't know if travel is even the right word.

[00:28:49] When you get back to the concepts that undergird ether physics, it's a perturbation of the ether in which we see this.

[00:29:00] It's just like a sound wave. It's not actually traveling.

[00:29:04] It's disturbing the medium. It's disturbing the air.

[00:29:08] So when you have this vibration, it disturbs the air, and it doesn't truly travel.

[00:29:13] It just creates this ripple through the air.

[00:29:17] And it translates as sound to the human ear.

[00:29:21] So it's the same thing with light.

[00:29:24] But light needs a medium also in which to manifest in this way.

[00:29:29] So this is how Tesla described it.

[00:29:32] And of course, there's a lot smarter people who have described this in much better ways than I can.

[00:29:37] But it seems to be a misnomer that sound or light, quote unquote, travel in the way that they do.

[00:29:44] So it's just a disruption in the medium.

[00:29:49] And of course, in this case, when we're talking about radio waves or what we're familiar with as radio,

[00:29:55] we're talking about different frequencies of sound waves.

[00:29:58] And sound travels through the air or the water or whatever other physical medium that we have here that it goes through.

[00:30:06] Or wires in some cases, as in the early telegraphy.

[00:30:10] But the discovery by the ether physicists, including James Clerk Maxwell,

[00:30:16] discovered that there's also perturbations that occur in the ether as well.

[00:30:21] And that these waveforms transcend through these different forms of mediums,

[00:30:27] whether it be the air or the ether.

[00:30:30] And this potential could be utilized if it's understood properly.

[00:30:35] So he made predictions on that.

[00:30:39] He made predictions about the existence of these electromagnetic waves in the ether.

[00:30:45] Because certainly it could be demonstrated that it happens through air or some other medium like water,

[00:30:52] these kinds of things.

[00:30:54] So he made the prediction about electromagnetic waves in the ether.

[00:30:58] So let's see what else we could muster from that now.

[00:31:00] So both light and electricity, Maxwell showed, resulted from vibrations in the ether.

[00:31:06] They differed only in the rate of vibration.

[00:31:08] He predicted that electric waves could be set up by electric oscillations and like light or sound waves,

[00:31:15] could be detected.

[00:31:16] These electric waves would travel at the speed of light.

[00:31:19] Although the notion of a mysterious all-pervasive ether later became discredited among scientists,

[00:31:25] it served Maxwell as a convenient fiction to help explain the presence and behavior of electromagnetic waves.

[00:31:33] I'm going to pause for a moment here, folks.

[00:31:35] So the author of this book seems to align his ideologies with what our modern physics shows.

[00:31:43] And that's fine.

[00:31:45] People can have differing opinions about this.

[00:31:47] It seems to me that if you go back to the understandings of ether physics,

[00:31:53] you have a better model to work from for how things truly operate in this world.

[00:32:00] That's just my opinion.

[00:32:02] And that's also the opinion of many other learned people,

[00:32:06] including Nikola Tesla,

[00:32:08] who seems to be the one who understood the electromagnetic spectrum the best.

[00:32:16] And I don't think there's too many others who've come along since then that maybe could understand this better than Tesla did.

[00:32:29] Now, there were some and there probably still are some.

[00:32:32] I would say Eric Dollard is probably one of the modern people that has a very good grasp of this and how things truly operate.

[00:32:40] So if you want a better understanding of that, you can go ahead and listen to some of the things he's put down.

[00:32:47] It's interesting, interesting stuff for sure.

[00:32:49] And of course, as always, I'll cite Ken Wheeler,

[00:32:52] who actually wrote several books and various other materials about this and seems to have a very good understanding of the true nature of electromagnetism.

[00:33:05] So he's another valuable resource in the modern era that could give you a better clue as to what goes on with this,

[00:33:11] at least in my view and the things I've seen and I've studied and I've looked at as well.

[00:33:15] It seems the ideas put forward by these two modern thinkers align with much of what I've found,

[00:33:21] especially that jive with some of these thinkers of the past,

[00:33:24] like Tesla, like James Clerk Maxwell,

[00:33:27] like some of the early ether physicists.

[00:33:30] And it seems it's a better model for understanding how things actually occur in this world.

[00:33:37] And this transcends just things like radio broadcasting, folks.

[00:33:41] I'm talking about the very nature of consciousness,

[00:33:44] the very nature of manifestation here in the physical world.

[00:33:48] It all ties together.

[00:33:49] And of course, it all ties back to the old hermetic sciences as well.

[00:33:54] So there's a lot of different connections and ways of thinking about it.

[00:33:57] But certainly, I think much has been lost in the modern era in regards to these ways of thinking.

[00:34:04] But as it pertains to the topic today, let's get back to the reading here.

[00:34:12] So it says,

[00:34:13] Over 20 years later, Heinrich Hertz built machines to generate and detect electric waves,

[00:34:18] confirming Maxwell's electromagnetic wave theory.

[00:34:21] Between 1888 and 1892, Hertz performed a series of classic experiments

[00:34:27] showing that electric waves, like sound, heat, or light,

[00:34:31] could be reflected, refracted, concentrated, and focused.

[00:34:34] Throughout the 1890s, scores of researchers all over the world

[00:34:38] took up the intellectual challenge of exploring the wonders of Hertzian waves.

[00:34:44] Edward Branly in France and Oliver Lodge in England

[00:34:48] made great strides in perfecting the coherer.

[00:34:51] Branly discovered that loose metal filings in a glass tube,

[00:34:55] which normally have a high electrical resistance,

[00:34:58] would lose their resistance in the presence of electric oscillations,

[00:35:01] cohering and thereby becoming a conductor.

[00:35:04] Lodge added a tapper arrangement, like that of a doorbell to Branly's coherer.

[00:35:09] Each successive impulse produced coherence and decoherence.

[00:35:14] The filings took the place of a telegraph key,

[00:35:17] allowing a recording instrument to receive messages.

[00:35:21] In Russia, Alexander Popov used a coherer attached to a vertical wire

[00:35:26] that was designed to record atmospheric disturbances

[00:35:29] and detect thunderstorms in advance.

[00:35:32] But none of these scientists had a clear conception

[00:35:35] of using Hertzian waves for regular wireless communication.

[00:35:40] Others in the scientific community, however,

[00:35:42] did see great potential for etheric telegraphy.

[00:35:46] In 1892, noting the investigations of Hertz and Lodge

[00:35:51] into ethereal vibrations or electric rays,

[00:35:54] British physicist William Crookes wrote,

[00:35:57] quote,

[00:35:58] Here is unfolded to us a new and astonishing world.

[00:36:01] One, which it is hard to conceive,

[00:36:04] should contain no possibilities of transmitting and receiving intelligence.

[00:36:08] What therefore remains to be discovered is,

[00:36:11] firstly, simpler and more certain means

[00:36:13] of generating electrical rays of any desired wavelength.

[00:36:17] Secondly, more delicate receivers,

[00:36:19] which will respond to wavelengths between certain defined limits

[00:36:23] and be silent to all others.

[00:36:26] Thirdly, means of darting the sheaf of rays in any desired direction.

[00:36:31] This is no mere dream of a visionary philosopher.

[00:36:35] All the requisites needed to bring it within the grasp of daily life

[00:36:39] are well within the possibilities of discovery, end quote.

[00:36:42] So that was from William Crookes.

[00:36:46] He wrote that in 1892.

[00:36:49] So he basically just outlined what's necessary to make radio broadcasting possible.

[00:36:56] Now, they're thinking in terms of communication, first of all.

[00:37:01] But there's another property of all of this

[00:37:06] that lies just beneath the surface of what's being discussed here

[00:37:11] and what lies just beneath the surface of what's been devised and developed technologically in this world.

[00:37:18] And Nikola Tesla touched upon this in his work, in his researches.

[00:37:22] You see, if you can wirelessly transmit information via a broadcast or radio wave,

[00:37:29] it is also not only possible,

[00:37:33] but probable that you can transmit electricity wirelessly.

[00:37:39] And certainly, this is what Tesla wanted to do.

[00:37:46] And those financiers who were supporting his work,

[00:37:51] when they found out what he was up to,

[00:37:54] they decided to stop funding him for this

[00:37:58] because their whole concern,

[00:38:01] how do you put a meter on that?

[00:38:04] That was their concern.

[00:38:07] Of course, we're talking about J.P. Morgan in particular,

[00:38:10] and some others in general.

[00:38:14] But this was the whole notion that captured the imagination of Nikola Tesla,

[00:38:19] the wireless transmission of electricity as a usable form of energy.

[00:38:24] We're talking wireless energy.

[00:38:26] And he was able to demonstrate and do this.

[00:38:29] He had built a workshop somewhere near Colorado Springs,

[00:38:37] and he was able to light light bulbs wirelessly from a distance of 20-some miles,

[00:38:42] if memory serves me correctly,

[00:38:44] using just this transmitting tower he built there in an experiment.

[00:38:49] Now, he later developed these concepts a little further

[00:38:53] in his laboratory called Wardenclyffe on Long Island.

[00:38:57] And this is where he was beginning to develop the fundamental stages

[00:39:05] of the wireless broadcasting of electricity.

[00:39:08] And this is when J.P. Morgan stepped in

[00:39:11] and began to shut down the funding for the research.

[00:39:14] And Wardenclyffe shut down.

[00:39:16] And the tower that was there is no longer standing.

[00:39:19] But, of course, there is still some infrastructure there.

[00:39:22] And you can actually visit Wardenclyffe.

[00:39:25] You could arrange a tour there of the old shutdown Wardenclyffe.

[00:39:29] Now, it's said there's not much that remains inside.

[00:39:32] But you could walk around the grounds there.

[00:39:35] And I would love to go check that place out at some point.

[00:39:39] But, at any rate, that's what lies just beneath the surface.

[00:39:45] We know, beyond a shadow of a reasonable doubt,

[00:39:49] that you can transmit a radio signal wirelessly.

[00:39:53] Well, this is just an electromagnetic spectrum frequency band of sorts.

[00:40:00] Electricity is also essentially the same thing.

[00:40:04] So, it's just a matter of perhaps finding the proper way to attune the frequency band

[00:40:13] in order to wirelessly transmit electricity.

[00:40:16] And there are certain tech companies that are actually working on that

[00:40:20] and developing that right now

[00:40:22] and have probably developed some working models of this.

[00:40:25] And, of course, they're talking about now where you can, in the near future,

[00:40:30] buy a cell phone or something that you'll never need to recharge

[00:40:33] because it will recharge wirelessly.

[00:40:36] They're working on these technologies.

[00:40:37] It's out there in the open literature.

[00:40:39] Now, this was all stuff envisioned by Tesla way back over 120 years ago.

[00:40:45] He knew what he was doing.

[00:40:47] He knew what he was looking at.

[00:40:49] And some of these early ether physicists also understood that precept.

[00:40:56] And you have to wonder, well, why did ether physics take a backdoor to Einstein's theories?

[00:41:03] And if we look at that convoluted time in the history of science and physics,

[00:41:09] we begin to see certain ideas pushed to the background

[00:41:15] and new ideas adopted in its place,

[00:41:18] which lead us into thinking in terms of a model of physics

[00:41:22] that doesn't seem to jive with the reality around us.

[00:41:26] So, in order to make it work, they have to have two distinct models of physics.

[00:41:30] And they try their best to unify these models of physics

[00:41:34] into a grand unified model of physics.

[00:41:36] Of course, we're talking about, we have these notions of Einsteinian relativity

[00:41:42] and quantum theory,

[00:41:43] which seem to be the two major physics models

[00:41:47] that are at odds with one another right now.

[00:41:51] So, you have the physics on the macroscale

[00:41:53] and the physics on the microscale,

[00:41:54] and they're always trying to reify

[00:41:56] these two very distinct and different things,

[00:41:59] and they can't ever seem to make them jive.

[00:42:02] Now, if you go back and you look at the ether model of physics,

[00:42:07] there's no need to come up with all of these different mathematical reifications

[00:42:11] and ways of thinking in order to make these systems jive,

[00:42:15] to make the microcosm jive with the macrocosm.

[00:42:18] There's no need for that.

[00:42:20] Ether physics adequately explained things

[00:42:23] wherein our current models of physics do not.

[00:42:26] And I do think it seems very evident

[00:42:31] that within some of the black budget community

[00:42:34] and the special access programs of the military-industrial complex,

[00:42:38] they know this,

[00:42:39] and they know how to apply

[00:42:41] these different concepts

[00:42:44] that are derived from ether physics

[00:42:46] and develop technologies around those.

[00:42:50] So, this makes me question a lot of things,

[00:42:52] but certainly,

[00:42:53] this is something that's an important notion

[00:42:56] in the background of this development of radio as a technology.

[00:42:59] And that's why, even today,

[00:43:01] I am fascinated by radio.

[00:43:05] That's something strange

[00:43:07] that has kind of been

[00:43:10] enveloped in my personality

[00:43:12] from a very young age.

[00:43:13] I've always had a fascination with radio.

[00:43:16] Strange.

[00:43:17] And I never thought

[00:43:19] that it would play such an important role

[00:43:21] in my life as it does now.

[00:43:24] And it's interesting

[00:43:25] because this is actually something

[00:43:27] that runs through my family,

[00:43:30] which is strange enough.

[00:43:31] Now, my late father and I,

[00:43:34] we had a mutual love for talk radio.

[00:43:37] And this was something

[00:43:38] that I very fondly remember of him,

[00:43:40] and he actually gave me

[00:43:41] an old, old radio set

[00:43:43] that I have here in my studio

[00:43:45] behind me right now

[00:43:46] that I keep here

[00:43:48] as a keepsake.

[00:43:49] It has some sentimental value to me.

[00:43:51] It's an old 1950s-style radio tuner.

[00:43:55] And

[00:43:58] we've had this

[00:43:59] fascination with radio

[00:44:01] that somehow has transcended

[00:44:03] through our family generationally.

[00:44:05] You see, my grandfather,

[00:44:06] he was an old-time

[00:44:09] television repairman.

[00:44:11] I remember in his garage,

[00:44:13] he would have

[00:44:13] all of these television sets

[00:44:15] and radio tubes,

[00:44:16] and he would repair radio sets

[00:44:18] and television sets

[00:44:19] back in the day.

[00:44:21] That is what he did.

[00:44:23] And he had a fascination

[00:44:25] with this technology.

[00:44:25] So I find it weird,

[00:44:26] and I think it's

[00:44:27] something that runs

[00:44:30] through the generations

[00:44:32] in this way.

[00:44:32] Maybe it's that whole notion

[00:44:34] of genetic memory

[00:44:35] and this kind of thing.

[00:44:36] But I've always had

[00:44:37] this fascination

[00:44:38] with radio.

[00:44:40] And it's taken on

[00:44:41] such an important

[00:44:42] and prominent role

[00:44:43] in my life.

[00:44:44] So I'm still exploring

[00:44:45] these ideas.

[00:44:46] And of course,

[00:44:47] you see all of these

[00:44:48] other related things

[00:44:50] that occur

[00:44:51] in the background

[00:44:52] with the development

[00:44:53] of these radio technologies.

[00:44:54] So this is something

[00:44:55] that is of particular

[00:44:57] interest to me.

[00:44:58] And I hope you don't find

[00:44:59] my little diatribe here

[00:45:00] boring.

[00:45:01] But certainly,

[00:45:03] there are a lot of things

[00:45:04] we could still learn

[00:45:05] from the mechanics

[00:45:07] of radio broadcasting

[00:45:08] that could be applied

[00:45:09] if you just know

[00:45:11] how to think outside

[00:45:11] the box

[00:45:12] into other potential

[00:45:14] fields

[00:45:15] or modalities,

[00:45:16] if you want to put it

[00:45:17] that way.

[00:45:19] But let's get back

[00:45:20] to the reading here.

[00:45:21] So it says,

[00:45:22] Crook's article

[00:45:23] inspired the young

[00:45:24] Anglo-Italian

[00:45:25] Guglielmo Marconi

[00:45:26] to develop a truly

[00:45:28] practical

[00:45:28] wireless telegraphy

[00:45:30] based on Hertzian waves.

[00:45:32] In the popular imagination,

[00:45:34] Marconi's name

[00:45:35] is the most closely

[00:45:37] associated with

[00:45:38] the invention

[00:45:39] of the wireless telegraph.

[00:45:41] But this is a gross

[00:45:43] simplification.

[00:45:44] Marconi should be viewed

[00:45:46] as the crucial innovator

[00:45:47] in wireless,

[00:45:48] not as its inventor.

[00:45:50] By modifying,

[00:45:52] improving,

[00:45:52] and perfecting

[00:45:53] the devices

[00:45:53] introduced by Hertz,

[00:45:55] Lodge,

[00:45:55] Bramley,

[00:45:55] Popoff,

[00:45:56] and others,

[00:45:57] Marconi achieved

[00:45:58] the best practical results

[00:45:59] in wireless communication

[00:46:00] beginning in 1895.

[00:46:03] Gonna pause for a moment.

[00:46:05] And concurrently,

[00:46:06] Nikola Tesla

[00:46:07] was also developing

[00:46:08] the same types of ways

[00:46:10] of doing things

[00:46:11] as Marconi.

[00:46:12] And some will still argue

[00:46:14] that Tesla

[00:46:16] should be the one

[00:46:17] credited with the invention

[00:46:18] of the radio

[00:46:19] rather than Marconi.

[00:46:20] And of course,

[00:46:20] this is open for debate

[00:46:22] among scholars.

[00:46:23] It's all about

[00:46:24] who filed what patent

[00:46:26] at what time

[00:46:27] with what entity.

[00:46:29] All of these things

[00:46:30] were being developed

[00:46:31] pretty much simultaneously.

[00:46:33] So,

[00:46:34] Guglielmo Marconi,

[00:46:35] he gets a lot of credit

[00:46:37] for it

[00:46:37] because it would seem

[00:46:39] that his patents

[00:46:41] were the ones

[00:46:42] that were filed first

[00:46:45] or are the ones

[00:46:46] that are more

[00:46:47] held out

[00:46:48] as actual patents

[00:46:49] for radio broadcasting

[00:46:51] as a type of a

[00:46:54] means of communication

[00:46:55] or a way of doing things

[00:46:56] as wireless telegraphy

[00:46:57] as it was called.

[00:47:00] And Tesla's patents

[00:47:02] were a little more

[00:47:03] generalized.

[00:47:03] Like he had

[00:47:04] several different patents

[00:47:05] but he didn't have

[00:47:07] the patents

[00:47:07] stacked together

[00:47:08] into the same

[00:47:10] performance of a task

[00:47:11] in the same way

[00:47:12] Marconi did.

[00:47:13] Now,

[00:47:15] I don't want to get off

[00:47:16] on that side tangent here

[00:47:17] but let's put it this way.

[00:47:19] There's debate

[00:47:19] as to who should be

[00:47:21] the true father

[00:47:22] of radio.

[00:47:25] And you could argue

[00:47:26] all you want with this.

[00:47:27] So,

[00:47:27] largely the one

[00:47:28] that came into

[00:47:30] the scientific realm

[00:47:31] as the accepted

[00:47:32] inventor of radio broadcasting

[00:47:33] was Gugliomo Marconi

[00:47:35] by using the devices

[00:47:37] invented by some

[00:47:39] of these other people

[00:47:39] in conjunction

[00:47:40] in certain ways

[00:47:41] to get the best results.

[00:47:43] Unlike the university

[00:47:45] scientists,

[00:47:46] he had a clear idea

[00:47:47] for the commercial

[00:47:48] development of wireless.

[00:47:49] From the start,

[00:47:50] he surrounded himself

[00:47:51] with the best engineers

[00:47:52] for assistance

[00:47:53] as well as top

[00:47:54] managerial talent.

[00:47:55] Although his own

[00:47:57] technical contributions

[00:47:58] were not radically new,

[00:48:00] Marconi applied for patents

[00:48:01] on all of his projects

[00:48:03] thus making certain

[00:48:04] that his company

[00:48:05] acquired a dominant position.

[00:48:07] Taking advantage

[00:48:08] of his family's wealth

[00:48:09] and contacts in England,

[00:48:11] Marconi performed

[00:48:12] extensive experiments

[00:48:13] under the auspices

[00:48:14] of the British Post Office

[00:48:16] and in 1897,

[00:48:18] with the backing

[00:48:18] of English capitalists,

[00:48:20] he formed the

[00:48:21] Marconi Wireless

[00:48:22] Telegraph Company.

[00:48:23] The organization planned

[00:48:24] to install wireless equipment

[00:48:26] on light ships

[00:48:27] and lighthouses

[00:48:28] along the English coast.

[00:48:30] Marconi's achievements

[00:48:31] in wireless communication

[00:48:33] over progressively

[00:48:34] greater distances

[00:48:35] attracted enormous attention

[00:48:37] from the scientific world

[00:48:38] and the popular press

[00:48:39] on both sides

[00:48:40] of the Atlantic.

[00:48:42] Fifty years earlier,

[00:48:43] wire telegraphy

[00:48:44] inspired diverse theories

[00:48:45] about the nature

[00:48:46] of its driving force,

[00:48:48] electricity.

[00:48:49] All the work done

[00:48:50] with Hertzian waves

[00:48:51] fueled a similar,

[00:48:52] if more sophisticated,

[00:48:54] type of speculation

[00:48:55] on the nature

[00:48:56] of the ether.

[00:48:58] In particular,

[00:48:59] many scientists

[00:49:00] agreed with

[00:49:01] J. Ambrose Fleming,

[00:49:03] prominent physicist,

[00:49:04] engineer,

[00:49:04] and a later close

[00:49:05] associate of Marconi,

[00:49:06] who thought

[00:49:07] the theoretical import

[00:49:08] of wireless

[00:49:09] far more intriguing

[00:49:10] than its capacity

[00:49:11] to send messages.

[00:49:13] Its practical uses

[00:49:14] are indubitable,

[00:49:16] he wrote in 1899,

[00:49:17] but it has a wider interest

[00:49:19] from a scientific standpoint

[00:49:21] opens up a vista

[00:49:22] of fascinating speculation

[00:49:24] into the possible revelations

[00:49:26] in store for us

[00:49:27] concerning the powers

[00:49:28] and potencies

[00:49:29] of the mysterious ether.

[00:49:32] Gonna pause

[00:49:33] for a moment here, folks.

[00:49:35] Now,

[00:49:37] the question comes to mind again.

[00:49:41] Why has this notion

[00:49:43] of ether

[00:49:44] been promulgated

[00:49:46] to the dustbin

[00:49:46] of scientific history

[00:49:50] when this had

[00:49:51] such true potential

[00:49:53] of understanding

[00:49:54] and developing

[00:49:56] new technologies

[00:49:57] that could

[00:49:59] be massively

[00:50:01] transformational

[00:50:02] for the world?

[00:50:04] Well,

[00:50:05] who controls

[00:50:06] the development

[00:50:07] of these technologies?

[00:50:08] That's what we need

[00:50:10] to ask.

[00:50:11] And then you can begin

[00:50:12] to understand

[00:50:13] who has a financial interest

[00:50:15] in keeping

[00:50:16] these types

[00:50:17] of technologies

[00:50:18] just out of reach

[00:50:20] of the masses.

[00:50:21] Because if you think about it,

[00:50:23] if you explore this topic

[00:50:24] out to the depths

[00:50:25] of its potentials

[00:50:27] and possibilities,

[00:50:29] just exploring

[00:50:30] the concept alone

[00:50:31] of wireless electricity

[00:50:34] being a potentiality,

[00:50:36] this can be

[00:50:38] massively world-changing.

[00:50:41] free energy

[00:50:44] available

[00:50:45] out of thin air

[00:50:47] for anybody

[00:50:48] to use

[00:50:49] who has

[00:50:49] some type

[00:50:50] of a device

[00:50:51] that's electrical

[00:50:52] that could access it.

[00:50:54] Think about that.

[00:50:55] How transformational

[00:50:56] could that be?

[00:50:57] The other thing is

[00:50:58] how do you control

[00:50:59] access to this?

[00:51:00] If it's out there,

[00:51:03] if it's being

[00:51:04] broadcast

[00:51:04] through the ether,

[00:51:06] if you're broadcasting

[00:51:07] electricity

[00:51:07] through the ether,

[00:51:08] anybody with a potential

[00:51:12] proper receiver

[00:51:13] for that electricity

[00:51:15] can pick up

[00:51:16] that signal

[00:51:16] and use that,

[00:51:18] how would you

[00:51:19] control access

[00:51:20] to that?

[00:51:22] The only way

[00:51:23] would be

[00:51:24] maybe to sell

[00:51:25] a one-time use device

[00:51:26] that gives you

[00:51:27] access to that

[00:51:28] free electricity.

[00:51:30] And this is not

[00:51:32] very profitable

[00:51:33] for those companies

[00:51:35] in charge,

[00:51:35] is it?

[00:51:36] The ones that like to,

[00:51:38] I don't know,

[00:51:38] get their energy

[00:51:39] from burning

[00:51:40] what they term

[00:51:41] fossil fuels

[00:51:42] and this kind of thing.

[00:51:43] The big moneyed

[00:51:45] interests,

[00:51:47] the ones that

[00:51:48] generate power

[00:51:49] by building

[00:51:50] these massive

[00:51:50] electrical power plants

[00:51:52] where they burn

[00:51:53] fossil fuels

[00:51:54] or they use

[00:51:56] some other means

[00:51:58] to produce

[00:51:59] the electricity

[00:52:00] and then

[00:52:00] they have an

[00:52:02] entire infrastructure

[00:52:03] that they have to build

[00:52:04] and supply this to.

[00:52:05] this goes back

[00:52:06] to the old ways

[00:52:07] of thinking

[00:52:07] of the telegraph.

[00:52:09] It's a wired connection.

[00:52:11] You need to have

[00:52:11] this wired connection

[00:52:13] in order to

[00:52:15] send the electricity

[00:52:16] where it's needed.

[00:52:17] And this creates

[00:52:19] a monopoly of sorts

[00:52:20] by a small

[00:52:21] select few

[00:52:22] within

[00:52:22] an entire

[00:52:24] industry.

[00:52:25] Now,

[00:52:26] if that all

[00:52:27] goes away

[00:52:29] and we have

[00:52:30] free energy

[00:52:31] available to

[00:52:32] everyone,

[00:52:34] that

[00:52:34] is problematic

[00:52:36] for the people

[00:52:37] who control

[00:52:37] things in this world

[00:52:38] because it takes away

[00:52:40] much of their

[00:52:41] wealth and power

[00:52:42] and remember,

[00:52:43] wealth,

[00:52:44] as expressed

[00:52:45] in dollars,

[00:52:46] as expressed

[00:52:47] in the form

[00:52:48] of money,

[00:52:49] is nothing more

[00:52:50] than a measurement

[00:52:52] of social energy.

[00:52:53] It's about

[00:52:54] control.

[00:52:55] If you control

[00:52:56] the dollars,

[00:52:56] you control

[00:52:57] the people.

[00:52:58] Well,

[00:52:58] if they have

[00:52:59] no more need,

[00:53:01] if the people

[00:53:02] have no more

[00:53:03] need of

[00:53:04] access to

[00:53:05] the goods

[00:53:05] or services

[00:53:06] of that

[00:53:07] small select

[00:53:08] group of

[00:53:08] elitists

[00:53:09] who control

[00:53:09] things,

[00:53:10] then they

[00:53:11] have freedom

[00:53:11] to go about

[00:53:12] and do what

[00:53:12] they want

[00:53:13] and they

[00:53:13] don't need

[00:53:15] the industry

[00:53:18] to prop

[00:53:19] them up.

[00:53:20] And they're

[00:53:21] not paying

[00:53:22] their wealth,

[00:53:23] their social

[00:53:24] energy,

[00:53:25] to that industry

[00:53:25] or the

[00:53:26] mega corporations

[00:53:27] that run

[00:53:28] that industry

[00:53:30] and therefore

[00:53:31] it's not a

[00:53:32] profitable business

[00:53:33] model anymore

[00:53:34] and a lot of

[00:53:35] this falls down

[00:53:35] on that.

[00:53:36] Greedy

[00:53:37] corporations,

[00:53:37] that's one

[00:53:38] side of it,

[00:53:39] but when it

[00:53:39] gets down

[00:53:40] to the

[00:53:41] core of

[00:53:42] all of it,

[00:53:43] it's about

[00:53:43] control

[00:53:44] and it's

[00:53:45] about control

[00:53:45] by those

[00:53:46] at the top

[00:53:47] of the power

[00:53:47] structure

[00:53:48] who steer

[00:53:49] and direct

[00:53:51] these various

[00:53:52] agendas

[00:53:52] and technological

[00:53:53] developments.

[00:53:54] So they

[00:53:54] don't want

[00:53:55] the masses

[00:53:57] to have access

[00:53:58] to this,

[00:53:58] but certainly

[00:53:59] they cannot

[00:54:00] overlook

[00:54:01] the importance

[00:54:03] of the

[00:54:07] broadcasting

[00:54:07] of electromagnetic

[00:54:08] spectrum waves

[00:54:09] or Hertzian

[00:54:10] waves as they

[00:54:11] were called

[00:54:11] here.

[00:54:12] And this

[00:54:13] is just

[00:54:16] one

[00:54:16] aspect

[00:54:17] to this

[00:54:19] that we

[00:54:20] need to

[00:54:21] explore

[00:54:21] because there's

[00:54:24] a whole

[00:54:24] model of

[00:54:25] physics

[00:54:25] that exists

[00:54:26] beneath the

[00:54:27] surface

[00:54:28] that's not

[00:54:28] expressed in

[00:54:30] the mainstream

[00:54:30] at all.

[00:54:30] this ether

[00:54:32] model of

[00:54:32] physics

[00:54:33] which has

[00:54:34] better

[00:54:35] explanatory

[00:54:36] notions as

[00:54:38] to how

[00:54:38] things work

[00:54:39] first of all

[00:54:39] and second

[00:54:40] of all

[00:54:41] the developments

[00:54:42] that could be

[00:54:43] garnered from

[00:54:43] an understanding

[00:54:44] of this

[00:54:45] could monumentally

[00:54:46] change

[00:54:47] the focus

[00:54:48] of the world

[00:54:50] could change

[00:54:51] the direction

[00:54:51] the world's

[00:54:52] going in

[00:54:53] and could

[00:54:54] end poverty

[00:54:56] and end

[00:54:57] inequality

[00:54:58] and end

[00:54:59] all of these

[00:55:00] problems

[00:55:00] that we

[00:55:01] have

[00:55:01] but there's

[00:55:04] people at

[00:55:05] the top

[00:55:05] who have a

[00:55:06] vested interest

[00:55:07] in none of

[00:55:07] that coming

[00:55:08] to fruition

[00:55:10] because it

[00:55:10] benefits them

[00:55:12] to have

[00:55:13] one up

[00:55:14] on the rest

[00:55:14] of us

[00:55:15] makes them

[00:55:16] wealthy

[00:55:16] gives them

[00:55:17] a lot of

[00:55:18] privilege

[00:55:19] gives them

[00:55:20] a lot of

[00:55:20] power and

[00:55:21] influence

[00:55:22] gives them

[00:55:23] a lot of

[00:55:23] control of

[00:55:24] things that

[00:55:25] happen in

[00:55:25] this world

[00:55:27] and they

[00:55:27] don't care

[00:55:28] about humanity

[00:55:30] at large

[00:55:30] although they

[00:55:31] will profess

[00:55:31] that they

[00:55:32] do

[00:55:33] and that

[00:55:34] is the

[00:55:34] true

[00:55:36] evil

[00:55:36] behind all

[00:55:37] of this

[00:55:37] at any

[00:55:38] rate

[00:55:39] but let's

[00:55:40] get back

[00:55:41] to the

[00:55:41] reading

[00:55:42] here

[00:55:42] so it

[00:55:42] says

[00:55:42] for

[00:55:43] centuries

[00:55:43] scientists

[00:55:44] had

[00:55:44] postulated

[00:55:45] various

[00:55:46] ethers

[00:55:46] to explain

[00:55:47] phenomena

[00:55:47] as diverse

[00:55:48] as gravity

[00:55:49] light

[00:55:49] and the

[00:55:50] motion

[00:55:50] of the

[00:55:50] planets

[00:55:51] the

[00:55:51] theoretical

[00:55:52] work

[00:55:52] of

[00:55:53] Maxwell

[00:55:53] corroborated

[00:55:54] by

[00:55:54] Hertz's

[00:55:55] experiments

[00:55:55] seemed to

[00:55:56] prove that

[00:55:57] all

[00:55:57] electromagnetic

[00:55:58] and optical

[00:55:59] phenomena

[00:55:59] could be

[00:56:00] explained by

[00:56:01] a system

[00:56:01] of mechanical

[00:56:02] stresses

[00:56:02] in a

[00:56:03] single

[00:56:03] ether

[00:56:04] this

[00:56:05] all

[00:56:05] encompassing

[00:56:06] ether

[00:56:06] of fixed

[00:56:07] position

[00:56:08] and finite

[00:56:08] density

[00:56:09] sufficed

[00:56:10] to transmit

[00:56:10] all the

[00:56:11] known forces

[00:56:12] such as

[00:56:12] gravity

[00:56:13] light

[00:56:13] heat

[00:56:13] and

[00:56:13] electromagnetism

[00:56:14] that one

[00:56:16] material object

[00:56:17] exerted on

[00:56:17] another

[00:56:18] through distance

[00:56:19] the ether

[00:56:20] hypothesis

[00:56:20] enjoyed a

[00:56:21] wide

[00:56:21] acceptance

[00:56:22] by scientists

[00:56:23] in the

[00:56:23] late

[00:56:23] 19th

[00:56:24] century

[00:56:24] development

[00:56:25] of the

[00:56:26] first

[00:56:26] wireless

[00:56:27] devices

[00:56:27] in the

[00:56:28] 1890s

[00:56:28] no doubt

[00:56:29] added to

[00:56:30] the prestige

[00:56:30] of the

[00:56:31] single

[00:56:31] ether

[00:56:32] theory

[00:56:32] but when

[00:56:33] various

[00:56:33] experiments

[00:56:34] showed

[00:56:34] that the

[00:56:35] ether

[00:56:35] and its

[00:56:36] properties

[00:56:36] were

[00:56:37] unobservable

[00:56:38] the notion

[00:56:39] of a

[00:56:39] material

[00:56:40] ether

[00:56:40] became

[00:56:41] untenable

[00:56:41] and I'm

[00:56:42] going to

[00:56:42] pause for a

[00:56:43] moment here

[00:56:43] folks

[00:56:43] and here's

[00:56:44] what they're

[00:56:45] not telling

[00:56:45] you

[00:56:47] those

[00:56:47] experiments

[00:56:48] that supposedly

[00:56:49] showed

[00:56:50] that the

[00:56:50] ether

[00:56:51] and its

[00:56:51] properties

[00:56:51] were

[00:56:51] unobservable

[00:56:53] while they're

[00:56:54] lying about

[00:56:55] that

[00:56:55] this has

[00:56:57] since been

[00:56:57] demonstrated

[00:56:58] that you

[00:56:59] can

[00:56:59] observe

[00:57:00] some of

[00:57:01] the properties

[00:57:01] of the

[00:57:02] ether

[00:57:02] this is what

[00:57:04] the

[00:57:04] mickelson-morley

[00:57:05] experiment

[00:57:05] was about

[00:57:06] now

[00:57:06] here's the

[00:57:08] thing

[00:57:08] they said

[00:57:08] the results

[00:57:09] mickelson-morley

[00:57:10] got disproved

[00:57:11] the ether

[00:57:11] well that's

[00:57:12] not necessarily

[00:57:13] true

[00:57:13] and

[00:57:14] the mickelson-morley

[00:57:16] experiment

[00:57:17] is regarded

[00:57:19] by some as a

[00:57:19] very important

[00:57:20] facet to

[00:57:21] the proving

[00:57:22] or disproving

[00:57:22] of the

[00:57:23] ether

[00:57:23] now here's

[00:57:24] what happened

[00:57:26] about 20

[00:57:27] years ago

[00:57:27] or so

[00:57:28] a group

[00:57:29] in new

[00:57:30] zealand

[00:57:30] called

[00:57:30] liquid

[00:57:31] gravity

[00:57:31] decided to

[00:57:33] redo

[00:57:34] the

[00:57:34] mickelson-morley

[00:57:35] experiment

[00:57:36] but they

[00:57:36] turned the

[00:57:37] entire

[00:57:37] apparatus

[00:57:38] 90 degrees

[00:57:39] and they

[00:57:39] were able

[00:57:39] to observe

[00:57:40] and measure

[00:57:41] an ether

[00:57:43] flow

[00:57:44] and this

[00:57:45] is something

[00:57:47] that is

[00:57:47] important

[00:57:48] to consider

[00:57:49] but you

[00:57:50] will very

[00:57:50] likely not

[00:57:51] hear about

[00:57:52] that anywhere

[00:57:54] this was

[00:57:55] an important

[00:57:56] finding

[00:57:58] because

[00:57:59] the mickelson-morley

[00:58:00] experiment

[00:58:02] when they

[00:58:03] originally did

[00:58:04] this

[00:58:05] they had

[00:58:06] the apparatus

[00:58:07] positioned

[00:58:08] in the wrong

[00:58:09] way

[00:58:10] and therefore

[00:58:11] that is why

[00:58:11] people came up

[00:58:12] with this idea

[00:58:14] that it disproved

[00:58:15] the ether

[00:58:16] when in fact

[00:58:17] nothing could be

[00:58:18] further from the

[00:58:18] truth

[00:58:19] but this is

[00:58:20] what the

[00:58:20] annals of

[00:58:21] history record

[00:58:23] this is what

[00:58:23] we're told

[00:58:24] and then we

[00:58:25] have this rise

[00:58:25] of einsteinian

[00:58:26] theory here

[00:58:27] and we're

[00:58:27] going to get

[00:58:28] into that

[00:58:28] now

[00:58:28] because the

[00:58:29] author

[00:58:29] discusses

[00:58:30] this

[00:58:30] so he

[00:58:31] says that

[00:58:32] the various

[00:58:32] experiments

[00:58:33] showed that

[00:58:34] the ether

[00:58:35] and its

[00:58:35] properties

[00:58:36] were

[00:58:36] unobservable

[00:58:37] and therefore

[00:58:38] it became

[00:58:39] untenable

[00:58:40] now just

[00:58:41] because something

[00:58:42] is unobservable

[00:58:43] doesn't mean

[00:58:43] it's not true

[00:58:44] right

[00:58:45] that's the

[00:58:45] other facet

[00:58:46] of this

[00:58:46] we need

[00:58:47] to keep

[00:58:47] in mind

[00:58:48] but just

[00:58:49] like everything

[00:58:49] else

[00:58:50] our modern

[00:58:50] science

[00:58:51] will discard

[00:58:51] it if it

[00:58:52] cannot be

[00:58:52] adequately

[00:58:54] measured

[00:58:54] or weighed

[00:58:55] or quantified

[00:58:56] because they're

[00:58:57] all about

[00:58:57] quantifying

[00:58:58] the properties

[00:59:00] of a thing

[00:59:00] in order to

[00:59:02] prove their

[00:59:02] existence

[00:59:02] if you can't

[00:59:03] quantify it

[00:59:04] it doesn't

[00:59:04] exist

[00:59:04] and that's

[00:59:05] the problem

[00:59:05] with our

[00:59:06] modern way

[00:59:06] of thinking

[00:59:07] our modern

[00:59:08] science

[00:59:10] more rightly

[00:59:10] called

[00:59:11] scientism

[00:59:12] but let's

[00:59:13] get back to it

[00:59:13] here so it

[00:59:14] says by

[00:59:14] 1905

[00:59:15] Einstein's

[00:59:16] special theory

[00:59:17] of relativity

[00:59:17] had shown

[00:59:18] among other

[00:59:19] things that

[00:59:20] there could be

[00:59:20] no single

[00:59:21] ether providing

[00:59:22] an absolute

[00:59:23] standard of

[00:59:23] rest and that

[00:59:24] the velocity

[00:59:25] of light in

[00:59:26] empty space

[00:59:26] is always

[00:59:27] the same

[00:59:27] relative to

[00:59:28] any moving

[00:59:29] coordinate

[00:59:29] system

[00:59:30] I'm going to

[00:59:31] pause for a

[00:59:31] moment here

[00:59:32] folks now

[00:59:32] even in

[00:59:33] mainstream

[00:59:33] physics this

[00:59:34] has now

[00:59:35] been disproven

[00:59:36] the speed

[00:59:37] of light

[00:59:37] is not

[00:59:37] constant it

[00:59:38] is not

[00:59:38] always the

[00:59:39] same

[00:59:41] this has

[00:59:41] been disproven

[00:59:42] and you

[00:59:43] would think

[00:59:43] this would

[00:59:43] be a big

[00:59:44] part of

[00:59:44] relativity

[00:59:45] theory

[00:59:45] wouldn't

[00:59:46] you

[00:59:46] you would

[00:59:47] think

[00:59:47] this would

[00:59:47] be a

[00:59:48] big

[01:00:11] he called

[01:00:12] it

[01:00:12] quote

[01:00:12] a perfectly

[01:00:13] continuous

[01:00:14] subtle

[01:00:15] incomprehensible

[01:00:16] substance

[01:00:16] pervading all

[01:00:17] space

[01:00:17] and penetrating

[01:00:19] between the

[01:00:19] molecules

[01:00:20] of all

[01:00:21] ordinary

[01:00:21] matter

[01:00:22] which are

[01:00:23] embedded in

[01:00:24] it and

[01:00:24] connected with

[01:00:24] one another

[01:00:25] by its

[01:00:25] means

[01:00:26] and we

[01:00:26] must regard

[01:00:27] it as

[01:00:28] the one

[01:00:28] universal

[01:00:28] medium

[01:00:29] by which

[01:00:30] all actions

[01:00:30] between

[01:00:31] bodies

[01:00:31] are carried

[01:00:32] on

[01:00:32] end

[01:00:32] quote

[01:00:34] now

[01:00:34] I'm going

[01:00:35] to pause

[01:00:35] for a second

[01:00:36] there

[01:00:37] the ether

[01:00:38] you dare

[01:00:39] not utter

[01:00:40] that word

[01:00:40] in the realms

[01:00:41] of physics

[01:00:41] today

[01:00:42] but of course

[01:00:43] they still

[01:00:45] discuss this

[01:00:46] because it

[01:00:47] has to be

[01:00:48] present

[01:00:48] there has

[01:00:49] to be

[01:00:49] a medium

[01:00:50] there

[01:00:50] and they

[01:00:51] recognize

[01:00:51] this

[01:00:52] but they

[01:00:52] won't

[01:00:53] dare

[01:00:53] call it

[01:00:54] ether

[01:00:54] they won't

[01:00:55] dare

[01:00:56] talk about

[01:00:56] it

[01:00:57] in certain

[01:00:57] terms

[01:00:58] they will

[01:00:59] however

[01:01:00] use a

[01:01:01] mathematical

[01:01:02] reification

[01:01:02] to describe

[01:01:03] it

[01:01:03] some

[01:01:03] will

[01:01:04] call

[01:01:04] it

[01:01:04] dark

[01:01:04] matter

[01:01:05] or

[01:01:05] dark

[01:01:06] energy

[01:01:06] Einstein

[01:01:07] referred

[01:01:08] to it

[01:01:08] as the

[01:01:08] cosmological

[01:01:09] constant

[01:01:09] in his

[01:01:10] equations

[01:01:10] because you

[01:01:11] see even

[01:01:11] he had

[01:01:12] to account

[01:01:12] for it

[01:01:13] even though

[01:01:14] he's said

[01:01:15] to have

[01:01:15] discredited

[01:01:15] it

[01:01:17] and of

[01:01:18] course

[01:01:18] you have

[01:01:19] the modern

[01:01:20] quantum

[01:01:20] scientists

[01:01:21] quantum

[01:01:22] physicists

[01:01:22] describing

[01:01:24] this as

[01:01:24] the quantum

[01:01:25] vacuum

[01:01:25] or the

[01:01:26] zero

[01:01:26] point

[01:01:28] understand

[01:01:29] this

[01:01:30] doesn't

[01:01:30] matter

[01:01:30] what you

[01:01:31] call

[01:01:31] it

[01:01:31] it's

[01:01:32] still

[01:01:32] ether

[01:01:33] it's

[01:01:33] there

[01:01:34] they

[01:01:35] don't

[01:01:35] want

[01:01:35] to

[01:01:35] admit

[01:01:36] to

[01:01:36] it

[01:01:36] because

[01:01:37] here's

[01:01:37] the

[01:01:37] thing

[01:01:38] if you

[01:01:38] go back

[01:01:39] to some

[01:01:39] of these

[01:01:39] older

[01:01:39] ways

[01:01:40] of

[01:01:40] thinking

[01:01:40] going

[01:01:41] back

[01:01:41] to

[01:01:41] the

[01:01:42] science

[01:01:42] of the

[01:01:43] late

[01:01:43] 19th

[01:01:44] century

[01:01:44] here

[01:01:45] discussing

[01:01:46] ether

[01:01:46] physics

[01:01:47] you have

[01:01:47] a closer

[01:01:48] proximity

[01:01:48] of what

[01:01:49] things

[01:01:50] really

[01:01:50] look like

[01:01:51] and how

[01:01:52] they

[01:01:52] truly

[01:01:52] operate

[01:01:53] and if

[01:01:54] you get

[01:01:54] too

[01:01:54] close

[01:01:55] then you

[01:01:55] might

[01:01:56] actually

[01:01:56] make

[01:01:56] some

[01:01:56] discoveries

[01:01:57] that

[01:01:58] could

[01:01:58] lead

[01:01:59] to

[01:02:00] the fall

[01:02:00] of the

[01:02:01] empire

[01:02:02] that's

[01:02:03] what it's

[01:02:03] about

[01:02:03] and at

[01:02:06] the heart

[01:02:07] of all

[01:02:07] of this

[01:02:07] was the

[01:02:08] discovery

[01:02:09] of radio

[01:02:09] broadcasting

[01:02:10] that's why

[01:02:11] it's a

[01:02:12] massively

[01:02:12] important

[01:02:13] topic

[01:02:15] wireless

[01:02:16] broadcasting

[01:02:17] wireless

[01:02:18] energy

[01:02:19] wireless

[01:02:20] radio

[01:02:23] oh okay

[01:02:24] so we just

[01:02:25] described what

[01:02:26] Oliver Lodge

[01:02:27] described this

[01:02:28] as

[01:02:28] the ether

[01:02:30] so

[01:02:31] throughout

[01:02:31] the greater

[01:02:32] part of

[01:02:32] space

[01:02:33] one

[01:02:33] found

[01:02:34] simple

[01:02:34] unmodified

[01:02:35] ether

[01:02:35] elastic

[01:02:36] and massive

[01:02:37] squirming

[01:02:38] and quivering

[01:02:38] with energy

[01:02:39] but stationary

[01:02:40] as a whole

[01:02:40] here and there

[01:02:41] however were

[01:02:42] specks of

[01:02:43] electrified

[01:02:44] ether

[01:02:44] that were

[01:02:45] connected by

[01:02:45] fields of

[01:02:46] force

[01:02:46] and in a

[01:02:47] state of

[01:02:47] violent

[01:02:48] motion

[01:02:48] these

[01:02:49] specks

[01:02:49] were known

[01:02:50] as

[01:02:50] matter

[01:02:51] for

[01:02:52] physicists

[01:02:52] the

[01:02:53] ether

[01:02:53] theory

[01:02:53] provided

[01:02:54] a simple

[01:02:54] unifying

[01:02:55] principle

[01:02:55] ether

[01:02:56] was a

[01:02:56] basic

[01:02:57] category

[01:02:57] for

[01:02:58] understanding

[01:02:58] the

[01:02:58] physical

[01:02:59] universe

[01:02:59] the

[01:03:00] vagueness

[01:03:01] of

[01:03:01] the

[01:03:01] notion

[01:03:01] argued

[01:03:02] lodge

[01:03:03] will be

[01:03:03] nothing

[01:03:03] more

[01:03:04] than

[01:03:04] is

[01:03:04] proper

[01:03:05] in

[01:03:05] the

[01:03:05] present

[01:03:05] state

[01:03:06] of

[01:03:06] our

[01:03:06] knowledge

[01:03:06] so I'm

[01:03:07] going to

[01:03:07] pause

[01:03:08] for a

[01:03:08] moment

[01:03:08] here

[01:03:08] and this

[01:03:09] is what

[01:03:10] our

[01:03:10] modern

[01:03:10] science

[01:03:11] does not

[01:03:11] like

[01:03:12] about

[01:03:12] ether

[01:03:13] it's

[01:03:13] kind

[01:03:14] of

[01:03:14] vague

[01:03:14] because

[01:03:15] you can't

[01:03:15] truly

[01:03:16] measure

[01:03:16] it

[01:03:16] because

[01:03:17] it

[01:03:17] is

[01:03:17] a

[01:03:17] sub

[01:03:18] stratum

[01:03:19] of

[01:03:19] the

[01:03:19] material

[01:03:20] world

[01:03:21] in

[01:03:21] which

[01:03:21] we

[01:03:21] live

[01:03:22] it's

[01:03:23] not

[01:03:23] strictly

[01:03:24] physical

[01:03:24] now

[01:03:25] it is

[01:03:25] described

[01:03:26] in

[01:03:27] the

[01:03:27] secret

[01:03:28] schools

[01:03:28] by the

[01:03:29] occult

[01:03:30] fraternities

[01:03:30] as being

[01:03:31] a sub

[01:03:32] layer

[01:03:32] of the

[01:03:33] physical

[01:03:33] material

[01:03:34] plane

[01:03:35] in which

[01:03:35] we live

[01:03:36] the

[01:03:36] ether

[01:03:36] but it's

[01:03:37] a much

[01:03:38] finer

[01:03:38] form

[01:03:39] of

[01:03:39] matter

[01:03:40] it's

[01:03:41] much

[01:03:41] less

[01:03:42] dense

[01:03:42] according

[01:03:43] to how

[01:03:44] they

[01:03:58] occult

[01:03:58] to

[01:03:59] describe

[01:03:59] these

[01:03:59] various

[01:04:00] realms

[01:04:01] that

[01:04:01] exist

[01:04:02] around

[01:04:02] us

[01:04:02] and

[01:04:03] throughout

[01:04:03] the

[01:04:04] world

[01:04:04] here

[01:04:04] the

[01:04:04] invisible

[01:04:05] realms

[01:04:05] that

[01:04:07] seem

[01:04:07] to be

[01:04:08] ever

[01:04:08] present

[01:04:09] but can't

[01:04:10] necessarily

[01:04:10] be

[01:04:11] objectively

[01:04:12] quantified

[01:04:13] by our

[01:04:14] modern

[01:04:14] science

[01:04:15] ether

[01:04:15] falls into

[01:04:16] that

[01:04:16] category

[01:04:17] so

[01:04:17] it's

[01:04:18] kind

[01:04:18] of

[01:04:18] vague

[01:04:19] they

[01:04:20] can't

[01:04:21] deny

[01:04:21] its

[01:04:22] existence

[01:04:22] but

[01:04:22] they

[01:04:23] also

[01:04:24] can't

[01:04:24] measure

[01:04:24] it

[01:04:25] objectively

[01:04:25] so therefore

[01:04:26] they deny

[01:04:27] its

[01:04:27] existence

[01:04:28] even though

[01:04:29] they can't

[01:04:29] deny

[01:04:29] its

[01:04:30] existence

[01:04:30] so they

[01:04:31] come up

[01:04:31] with

[01:04:31] mathematical

[01:04:32] reifications

[01:04:33] to explain

[01:04:34] it away

[01:04:35] and sometimes

[01:04:36] they'll describe

[01:04:37] it as the

[01:04:37] quantum vacuum

[01:04:38] they'll describe

[01:04:39] it as I said

[01:04:40] as dark

[01:04:40] matter

[01:04:41] or dark

[01:04:41] energy

[01:04:42] and they'll

[01:04:43] find a way

[01:04:43] to work

[01:04:44] it into

[01:04:44] their

[01:04:45] system

[01:04:46] like I said

[01:04:47] Einstein

[01:04:47] described it

[01:04:48] as the

[01:04:48] cosmological

[01:04:49] constant

[01:04:49] what more

[01:04:50] can I tell

[01:04:51] you there

[01:04:51] they have

[01:04:52] to account

[01:04:52] for it

[01:04:53] in their

[01:04:54] mathematical

[01:04:55] measurements

[01:04:55] and

[01:04:56] quantifications

[01:04:56] but

[01:04:57] it's

[01:04:57] a vague

[01:04:58] quantity

[01:04:59] so therefore

[01:05:00] it's hard

[01:05:00] for them

[01:05:01] to express

[01:05:01] it adequately

[01:05:02] so they

[01:05:03] have to

[01:05:03] use

[01:05:03] a variable

[01:05:05] number

[01:05:06] for it

[01:05:06] and that's

[01:05:07] what they

[01:05:07] don't like

[01:05:08] because it

[01:05:09] is kind

[01:05:09] of a vague

[01:05:10] commodity

[01:05:11] and they

[01:05:12] don't have

[01:05:13] an adequate

[01:05:13] understanding

[01:05:14] of how

[01:05:15] it truly

[01:05:16] works

[01:05:17] now I

[01:05:18] think

[01:05:18] they've

[01:05:18] probably

[01:05:19] gotten a lot

[01:05:19] closer

[01:05:20] through the

[01:05:21] special

[01:05:21] access

[01:05:22] programs

[01:05:22] of the

[01:05:23] military

[01:05:23] industrial

[01:05:24] complex

[01:05:24] of understanding

[01:05:25] perhaps

[01:05:26] some of

[01:05:26] the machinations

[01:05:26] of how

[01:05:27] it works

[01:05:27] but they're

[01:05:29] not telling

[01:05:29] us about

[01:05:30] it are

[01:05:30] they

[01:05:32] let's

[01:05:33] read on

[01:05:33] but

[01:05:34] ether

[01:05:34] had

[01:05:35] important

[01:05:35] metaphysical

[01:05:36] implications

[01:05:36] as well

[01:05:37] and these

[01:05:37] might

[01:05:38] eventually

[01:05:38] be

[01:05:38] grasped

[01:05:39] with the

[01:05:39] help

[01:05:39] of the

[01:05:40] new

[01:05:40] wireless

[01:05:41] devices

[01:05:41] the feeling

[01:05:42] that the

[01:05:43] wireless

[01:05:43] had somehow

[01:05:44] put men

[01:05:45] on the

[01:05:45] threshold

[01:05:45] of the

[01:05:46] innermost

[01:05:46] secrets

[01:05:46] of nature

[01:05:47] paralleled

[01:05:48] that

[01:05:48] elicited

[01:05:49] by wire

[01:05:50] telegraphy

[01:05:50] the relation

[01:05:51] between

[01:05:52] the wireless

[01:05:52] and ether

[01:05:53] stirred anew

[01:05:54] the old

[01:05:54] dream

[01:05:55] of universal

[01:05:55] communication

[01:05:56] a dream

[01:05:57] expressed in

[01:05:58] religious terms

[01:05:59] by the early

[01:05:59] commentators

[01:06:00] on the

[01:06:01] telegraph

[01:06:01] but with

[01:06:02] the wireless

[01:06:03] the discussion

[01:06:04] drew its

[01:06:05] metaphors

[01:06:05] and vocabulary

[01:06:06] primarily from

[01:06:08] physics and

[01:06:08] biology

[01:06:10] conceptualizing

[01:06:11] and explaining

[01:06:11] just how

[01:06:12] ethereal

[01:06:13] telegraphy

[01:06:14] worked

[01:06:14] proved no

[01:06:15] easy task

[01:06:16] for scientists

[01:06:17] we have been

[01:06:18] so trained

[01:06:19] to regard

[01:06:19] currents of

[01:06:20] electricity

[01:06:20] as something

[01:06:21] flowing in

[01:06:22] one unbroken

[01:06:23] circuit

[01:06:23] wrote William

[01:06:24] Priest

[01:06:25] that their

[01:06:26] temporary

[01:06:27] condition

[01:06:27] as waves

[01:06:28] of energy

[01:06:29] in space

[01:06:29] is hard

[01:06:30] to realize

[01:06:30] especially

[01:06:31] in the

[01:06:31] absence

[01:06:32] of an

[01:06:32] electrical

[01:06:33] sense

[01:06:33] but perhaps

[01:06:34] in the

[01:06:35] coming

[01:06:35] ether

[01:06:36] age

[01:06:36] man

[01:06:37] might

[01:06:38] evolve

[01:06:38] a new

[01:06:39] electrical

[01:06:39] sense

[01:06:40] through his

[01:06:40] knowledge

[01:06:41] of electromagnetic

[01:06:42] waves

[01:06:42] Oliver Lodge

[01:06:44] argued that

[01:06:45] we are

[01:06:46] growing a

[01:06:46] new sense

[01:06:47] not indeed

[01:06:48] an actual

[01:06:49] sense organ

[01:06:49] but not

[01:06:50] so very

[01:06:51] unlike a

[01:06:52] new sense

[01:06:52] organ

[01:06:53] electroscopes

[01:06:54] galvanometers

[01:06:55] a new

[01:06:56] telephones

[01:06:56] delicate

[01:06:57] instruments

[01:06:58] these

[01:06:58] yet

[01:06:59] not yet

[01:07:00] eclipsing

[01:07:00] our sense

[01:07:01] organs of

[01:07:01] flesh

[01:07:02] but in

[01:07:02] a few

[01:07:03] cases

[01:07:03] coming

[01:07:03] within

[01:07:04] measurable

[01:07:04] distance

[01:07:05] of their

[01:07:05] surprising

[01:07:06] sensitiveness

[01:07:07] and with

[01:07:08] these

[01:07:08] what can

[01:07:09] we do

[01:07:09] can we

[01:07:10] smell

[01:07:10] the ether

[01:07:11] or touch

[01:07:11] it

[01:07:12] or what

[01:07:12] is the

[01:07:13] closest

[01:07:13] analogy

[01:07:14] perhaps

[01:07:14] there is

[01:07:15] no

[01:07:15] useful

[01:07:16] analogy

[01:07:16] but

[01:07:16] nonetheless

[01:07:17] we deal

[01:07:17] with it

[01:07:18] and that

[01:07:19] closely

[01:07:19] and I'm

[01:07:20] going to

[01:07:21] pause

[01:07:21] for a

[01:07:21] moment

[01:07:21] here

[01:07:22] so is

[01:07:23] it true

[01:07:23] are people

[01:07:24] developing

[01:07:24] some type

[01:07:25] of a

[01:07:25] new

[01:07:25] sense

[01:07:26] of sorts

[01:07:27] well think

[01:07:28] about this

[01:07:29] there are

[01:07:29] people who

[01:07:30] are sensitive

[01:07:31] to electromagnetic

[01:07:32] spectrum

[01:07:33] frequencies

[01:07:33] you probably

[01:07:35] know some

[01:07:35] people

[01:07:37] that get

[01:07:38] relatively

[01:07:38] sick

[01:07:39] if they

[01:07:40] approach

[01:07:41] a 5G

[01:07:42] tower

[01:07:42] or if

[01:07:43] they are

[01:07:44] in a

[01:07:45] heavy

[01:07:45] Wi-Fi

[01:07:46] network

[01:07:46] area

[01:07:48] they know

[01:07:49] it's

[01:07:49] there

[01:07:51] they can

[01:07:52] sense

[01:07:52] it

[01:07:53] and perhaps

[01:07:54] it has

[01:07:55] some ill

[01:07:55] health

[01:07:55] effects

[01:07:56] on them

[01:07:56] maybe

[01:07:57] there's

[01:07:57] something

[01:07:58] to this

[01:07:58] is this

[01:07:59] a type

[01:07:59] of an

[01:08:00] acknowledgement

[01:08:01] of the

[01:08:01] ether

[01:08:03] are we

[01:08:04] developing

[01:08:04] some new

[01:08:05] sense

[01:08:05] about it

[01:08:06] because of

[01:08:06] the inundation

[01:08:07] of the

[01:08:08] world

[01:08:08] with these

[01:08:09] new

[01:08:09] electromagnetic

[01:08:10] frequencies

[01:08:10] that hadn't

[01:08:12] been around

[01:08:12] prior

[01:08:13] who knows

[01:08:15] let's

[01:08:16] continue

[01:08:17] reading

[01:08:17] because now

[01:08:18] it gets

[01:08:18] interesting

[01:08:18] telepathy

[01:08:20] perhaps the

[01:08:20] ultimate

[01:08:21] form of

[01:08:21] universal

[01:08:22] communication

[01:08:22] might follow

[01:08:23] from a

[01:08:24] better

[01:08:24] understanding

[01:08:25] of the

[01:08:25] ether

[01:08:26] the

[01:08:26] universal

[01:08:26] medium

[01:08:28] among

[01:08:28] others

[01:08:29] the American

[01:08:30] physicist

[01:08:30] Amos E.

[01:08:31] Dolbear

[01:08:31] postulated

[01:08:32] that since

[01:08:33] different kinds

[01:08:34] of motion

[01:08:35] in the

[01:08:35] ether

[01:08:35] generated

[01:08:36] heat

[01:08:36] light

[01:08:37] electricity

[01:08:37] and

[01:08:37] magnetism

[01:08:38] scientists

[01:08:39] might soon

[01:08:39] be able

[01:08:40] to manipulate

[01:08:40] the ether

[01:08:41] to produce

[01:08:42] thought

[01:08:42] transference

[01:08:43] with brain

[01:08:44] waves

[01:08:44] gonna pause

[01:08:45] for a moment

[01:08:46] folks

[01:08:46] and are we

[01:08:47] indeed

[01:08:48] just about

[01:08:48] there

[01:08:49] I would

[01:08:51] say

[01:08:51] probably

[01:08:53] let's

[01:08:54] continue

[01:08:54] though

[01:08:54] the English

[01:08:55] scientist

[01:08:56] William

[01:08:56] Ayrton

[01:08:57] told Marconi

[01:08:58] that his

[01:08:58] new method

[01:08:59] of communication

[01:09:00] seemed

[01:09:00] almost like

[01:09:01] dreamland

[01:09:02] and ghost

[01:09:03] land

[01:09:03] not the

[01:09:04] ghost

[01:09:04] land

[01:09:04] of the

[01:09:05] heated

[01:09:05] imagination

[01:09:05] cultivated

[01:09:06] by the

[01:09:07] psychical

[01:09:08] society

[01:09:08] but a

[01:09:08] real

[01:09:09] communication

[01:09:09] from a

[01:09:10] distance

[01:09:10] based on

[01:09:11] true

[01:09:11] physical

[01:09:12] laws

[01:09:12] if the

[01:09:13] ether

[01:09:14] theory

[01:09:14] straddled

[01:09:15] the

[01:09:15] physical

[01:09:15] and the

[01:09:16] metaphysical

[01:09:16] most

[01:09:17] scientists

[01:09:17] found

[01:09:18] this fact

[01:09:18] more ironic

[01:09:19] than preposterous

[01:09:20] after all

[01:09:21] the ether

[01:09:22] theory

[01:09:22] had gained

[01:09:22] greater

[01:09:23] credence

[01:09:23] precisely

[01:09:24] because

[01:09:24] of the

[01:09:25] latest

[01:09:25] discoveries

[01:09:26] of scientists

[01:09:27] in the field

[01:09:27] of the

[01:09:28] wireless

[01:09:28] Oliver Lodge

[01:09:30] noted that

[01:09:30] natural

[01:09:31] philosophy

[01:09:31] must sometimes

[01:09:32] be forced

[01:09:33] into a

[01:09:34] conviction

[01:09:34] about something

[01:09:35] intangible

[01:09:35] and occult

[01:09:36] and I'm

[01:09:37] going to

[01:09:37] quote from

[01:09:37] him here

[01:09:38] this is

[01:09:39] Oliver Lodge

[01:09:39] quote

[01:09:40] and when

[01:09:41] next century

[01:09:42] or the

[01:09:42] century

[01:09:43] after

[01:09:43] lets us

[01:09:44] deeper

[01:09:45] into their

[01:09:45] secrets

[01:09:46] and he's

[01:09:46] speaking of

[01:09:47] electricity

[01:09:47] and ether

[01:09:48] and into

[01:09:49] the secrets

[01:09:49] of some

[01:09:50] other

[01:09:50] phenomena

[01:09:51] now for

[01:09:52] the first

[01:09:52] time being

[01:09:53] rationally

[01:09:53] investigated

[01:09:54] I feel

[01:09:55] as if it

[01:09:55] would be

[01:09:56] no merely

[01:09:57] material

[01:09:57] prospect

[01:09:58] that will

[01:09:59] be opening

[01:10:00] on our

[01:10:00] view

[01:10:00] but that

[01:10:01] we shall

[01:10:02] get a

[01:10:02] glimpse

[01:10:03] into a

[01:10:03] region

[01:10:04] of the

[01:10:04] universe

[01:10:04] as yet

[01:10:05] unexplored

[01:10:06] by science

[01:10:06] which has

[01:10:07] been sought

[01:10:08] from afar

[01:10:09] and perhaps

[01:10:10] blindly

[01:10:11] apprehended

[01:10:11] by painters

[01:10:12] and poets

[01:10:12] by philosophers

[01:10:13] and scientists

[01:10:14] end quote

[01:10:15] so that's an

[01:10:16] interesting

[01:10:17] quote

[01:10:17] so he's

[01:10:19] foreseeing

[01:10:20] that perhaps

[01:10:21] sometime

[01:10:22] this century

[01:10:23] now he was

[01:10:24] speaking in

[01:10:25] terms of

[01:10:25] the 20th

[01:10:26] century and

[01:10:27] perhaps the

[01:10:27] following

[01:10:27] century the

[01:10:28] 21st

[01:10:28] century that's

[01:10:29] now that

[01:10:30] we would be

[01:10:31] coming into

[01:10:32] perhaps this

[01:10:33] new knowledge

[01:10:33] of how things

[01:10:34] work and I

[01:10:36] think we're at

[01:10:37] the precipice of

[01:10:37] this folks it's

[01:10:38] just a matter

[01:10:39] of those

[01:10:41] structures in

[01:10:43] this world

[01:10:43] that have been

[01:10:45] built and

[01:10:45] implemented and

[01:10:46] put in place

[01:10:46] to protect

[01:10:48] the elitist

[01:10:49] class this

[01:10:51] very wealthy

[01:10:51] sub group

[01:10:53] that sits

[01:10:54] astride the

[01:10:55] top of the

[01:10:56] power structure

[01:10:56] in this

[01:10:57] world once

[01:10:58] those things

[01:10:59] begin to

[01:10:59] fall then

[01:11:00] perhaps we'll

[01:11:01] have a better

[01:11:01] understanding of

[01:11:03] the machinations

[01:11:04] of how things

[01:11:05] truly work in

[01:11:06] this world and

[01:11:07] perhaps we'll

[01:11:08] have a better

[01:11:09] future a better

[01:11:10] way forward

[01:11:12] we are living in

[01:11:13] the times of

[01:11:14] revelation the

[01:11:15] veils being

[01:11:16] torn away and I

[01:11:17] don't think it's

[01:11:17] any different with

[01:11:18] this a lot of

[01:11:19] the scientific

[01:11:20] developments have

[01:11:21] been hidden away

[01:11:21] from us by

[01:11:22] these military

[01:11:23] industrial complex

[01:11:24] special access

[01:11:25] programs the

[01:11:27] black budget

[01:11:28] community the

[01:11:29] deep state

[01:11:29] whatever you want

[01:11:30] to call it it

[01:11:31] constitutes a

[01:11:31] breakaway

[01:11:32] civilization of

[01:11:33] sorts that has

[01:11:34] been hiding

[01:11:36] some of these

[01:11:37] innovations from

[01:11:38] mankind because

[01:11:39] it does not

[01:11:40] benefit them to

[01:11:40] let them out to

[01:11:41] the public at

[01:11:42] large that I

[01:11:46] think is the

[01:11:48] important prospect

[01:11:49] to all of this

[01:11:50] but let's get

[01:11:51] back to it

[01:11:52] and this is just

[01:11:52] showing you

[01:11:53] why is looking

[01:11:55] at the history

[01:11:55] of radio so

[01:11:57] important today

[01:11:58] and what about

[01:12:00] this concept of

[01:12:01] the ethereal

[01:12:02] hearth

[01:12:04] the hearth

[01:12:05] the center of

[01:12:06] the home

[01:12:07] and how can it

[01:12:09] be reached

[01:12:10] through some

[01:12:13] unknown

[01:12:14] invisible medium

[01:12:16] and how could

[01:12:17] it be influenced

[01:12:18] and certainly

[01:12:19] you could see

[01:12:20] this psychological

[01:12:23] underscore

[01:12:24] of how that's

[01:12:26] been done by

[01:12:27] manipulating

[01:12:27] radio broadcast

[01:12:29] media to

[01:12:31] influence human

[01:12:32] behaviors and

[01:12:33] later of course

[01:12:34] television

[01:12:35] internet

[01:12:36] social media

[01:12:37] all of the

[01:12:38] things we have

[01:12:38] today all of

[01:12:39] these different

[01:12:40] forms of

[01:12:40] communication

[01:12:42] communication

[01:12:43] being key here

[01:12:44] because they're

[01:12:45] communicating in

[01:12:47] ways that we

[01:12:48] scarcely even

[01:12:48] realize with

[01:12:49] some of

[01:12:50] these technologies

[01:12:50] you see it's

[01:12:52] not just a

[01:12:52] direct conversation

[01:12:53] back and forth

[01:12:54] or a exchange

[01:12:56] of information

[01:12:57] or a broadcast

[01:12:58] of information

[01:12:58] there are

[01:13:00] unconscious

[01:13:01] things being

[01:13:02] conveyed through

[01:13:02] this and

[01:13:03] subconscious

[01:13:04] things being

[01:13:04] conveyed through

[01:13:05] this this is

[01:13:07] something that

[01:13:08] transcends

[01:13:10] the conscious

[01:13:11] mind into the

[01:13:12] unconscious realm

[01:13:13] through this

[01:13:14] ethereal hearth

[01:13:15] because these

[01:13:18] carrier signals

[01:13:19] can sometimes

[01:13:20] have other

[01:13:22] spiritual

[01:13:23] connotations

[01:13:23] attached to

[01:13:24] them some

[01:13:25] intentionality

[01:13:26] attached to

[01:13:26] them things

[01:13:27] that are not

[01:13:28] easily quantifiable

[01:13:29] but certainly

[01:13:29] do exist and

[01:13:31] disregarding the

[01:13:32] spiritual component

[01:13:33] of things is what

[01:13:34] our modern science

[01:13:35] does all the

[01:13:36] time but the

[01:13:37] intention is

[01:13:39] also embedded

[01:13:40] in the signal

[01:13:41] and that's why I

[01:13:43] think this author

[01:13:44] presciently whether

[01:13:45] he realizes it or

[01:13:46] not called it the

[01:13:47] ethereal hearth

[01:13:48] the radio

[01:13:50] let's continue

[01:13:53] though in 1902

[01:13:54] Marconi succeeded

[01:13:55] in signaling

[01:13:56] across the

[01:13:57] Atlantic by

[01:13:57] wireless telegraphy

[01:13:58] fueling further

[01:13:59] excitement about

[01:14:00] the possibilities

[01:14:01] two areas of

[01:14:03] service opened up

[01:14:03] in these years

[01:14:04] the purely

[01:14:05] commercial sending

[01:14:06] of messages

[01:14:07] and the selling

[01:14:07] or leasing of

[01:14:08] equipment for

[01:14:09] the marine

[01:14:10] wireless

[01:14:11] by 1905

[01:14:12] the Marconi

[01:14:13] organization alone

[01:14:14] had outfitted

[01:14:15] hundreds of

[01:14:16] naval and

[01:14:16] commercial vessels

[01:14:17] and had set up

[01:14:18] 50 land stations

[01:14:20] around the world

[01:14:21] at first the

[01:14:22] Marconi companies

[01:14:23] sold equipment

[01:14:23] but they soon

[01:14:24] adopted a policy

[01:14:25] of selling

[01:14:26] communication like

[01:14:27] the telephone

[01:14:28] company

[01:14:28] they leased

[01:14:29] wireless sets

[01:14:30] and provided a

[01:14:31] Marconi trained

[01:14:32] operator who

[01:14:33] communicated only

[01:14:34] with other

[01:14:35] Marconi equipped

[01:14:35] ships or shore

[01:14:37] stations

[01:14:37] gonna pause for a

[01:14:38] moment here

[01:14:39] so now you see

[01:14:40] early on

[01:14:42] they figured

[01:14:43] out how to

[01:14:44] monetize this

[01:14:45] even though

[01:14:47] technically

[01:14:49] if you just

[01:14:50] produce the

[01:14:50] device and

[01:14:51] sell it to

[01:14:52] the buyer

[01:14:54] and you have

[01:14:54] other buyers

[01:14:55] who have the

[01:14:57] same devices

[01:14:57] then ostensibly

[01:14:59] you would think

[01:15:00] they could just

[01:15:01] use the device

[01:15:02] and communicate

[01:15:02] one with another

[01:15:03] well no that

[01:15:04] does not generate

[01:15:05] long term revenues

[01:15:06] so this is what

[01:15:08] they had in mind

[01:15:09] in the developing

[01:15:10] of these technologies

[01:15:11] how are we gonna

[01:15:13] keep making a

[01:15:14] buck off of

[01:15:15] this and it's

[01:15:16] sad that that's

[01:15:17] the state of

[01:15:18] human affairs

[01:15:18] when we have

[01:15:19] something that

[01:15:20] could be as

[01:15:20] transformational

[01:15:21] as this

[01:15:22] it's become

[01:15:23] an industrial

[01:15:24] property

[01:15:25] it's become

[01:15:26] commercialized

[01:15:27] it's become

[01:15:27] incentivized

[01:15:29] it's become

[01:15:30] a cash cow

[01:15:31] so this is what

[01:15:32] happened with

[01:15:32] the early

[01:15:32] Marconi company

[01:15:34] and we'll see

[01:15:35] how this crosses

[01:15:36] over into

[01:15:37] military and

[01:15:38] intelligence

[01:15:39] realms of

[01:15:42] things when you

[01:15:43] look at it here

[01:15:43] as well

[01:15:44] let's continue

[01:15:45] in the United

[01:15:47] States the

[01:15:48] British Marconi

[01:15:49] interests launched

[01:15:49] an American

[01:15:50] subsidiary that

[01:15:51] soon dominated

[01:15:52] the wireless

[01:15:53] field

[01:15:53] other companies

[01:15:54] began in

[01:15:55] America at

[01:15:56] this time

[01:15:56] spurred on

[01:15:57] by government

[01:15:57] patronage

[01:15:58] the U.S.

[01:15:59] weather borough

[01:16:00] hired Reginald

[01:16:01] Fessenden

[01:16:01] a Pittsburgh

[01:16:03] electrical engineer

[01:16:04] to conduct

[01:16:04] experiments in

[01:16:05] wireless as

[01:16:06] an aid to

[01:16:07] forecasting

[01:16:08] in 1902

[01:16:09] Fessenden

[01:16:10] formed the

[01:16:11] National Electric

[01:16:12] Signaling Company

[01:16:13] and he later

[01:16:14] became a leader

[01:16:15] in the development

[01:16:16] of wireless

[01:16:16] telephony

[01:16:17] telephony

[01:16:18] I guess is the

[01:16:19] proper pronunciation

[01:16:19] the wireless

[01:16:21] telephone

[01:16:21] Lee DeForest

[01:16:23] the other

[01:16:24] important American

[01:16:25] wireless inventor

[01:16:25] formed the

[01:16:26] first of several

[01:16:27] wireless companies

[01:16:28] in 1901

[01:16:29] the next year

[01:16:30] the government

[01:16:31] commissioned him

[01:16:32] to build

[01:16:33] experimental

[01:16:33] wireless sets

[01:16:34] and stations

[01:16:35] providing

[01:16:36] desperately

[01:16:36] needed funds

[01:16:37] later DeForest

[01:16:38] became perhaps

[01:16:39] the preeminent

[01:16:40] American inventor

[01:16:41] of the pre-war

[01:16:42] era

[01:16:43] and his

[01:16:43] Audion vacuum

[01:16:44] tube proved

[01:16:45] crucial for

[01:16:46] both radio

[01:16:47] transmission

[01:16:47] and reception

[01:16:48] gonna pause

[01:16:50] for a moment

[01:16:51] here folks

[01:16:52] now some of

[01:16:54] this is more

[01:16:55] familiar type

[01:16:56] technologies

[01:16:58] for some people

[01:17:00] who understood

[01:17:00] the early

[01:17:02] workings of

[01:17:03] radio

[01:17:04] radio

[01:17:04] this is where

[01:17:05] the vacuum

[01:17:06] tubes

[01:17:07] come into

[01:17:07] play

[01:17:08] here

[01:17:08] with all

[01:17:09] of this

[01:17:10] they were

[01:17:11] an important

[01:17:11] part of

[01:17:12] this

[01:17:12] now

[01:17:13] we're so

[01:17:14] beyond

[01:17:14] vacuum

[01:17:15] tubes

[01:17:15] at this

[01:17:15] point

[01:17:16] that it

[01:17:17] seems archaic

[01:17:18] to think

[01:17:18] about

[01:17:18] but these

[01:17:19] were some

[01:17:19] of the

[01:17:21] important

[01:17:21] early

[01:17:22] inventions

[01:17:23] that made

[01:17:25] this type

[01:17:25] of thing

[01:17:25] possible

[01:17:27] the major

[01:17:28] technical

[01:17:29] problem

[01:17:29] in these

[01:17:30] years

[01:17:30] was the

[01:17:30] perfection

[01:17:31] of

[01:17:31] syntony

[01:17:32] namely

[01:17:33] the tuning

[01:17:33] of wireless

[01:17:34] devices

[01:17:34] so that a

[01:17:35] transmitter

[01:17:36] could communicate

[01:17:37] with one

[01:17:37] receiver

[01:17:38] to the

[01:17:38] exclusion

[01:17:39] of others

[01:17:39] and vice

[01:17:40] versa

[01:17:40] the point

[01:17:41] to point

[01:17:42] model

[01:17:42] of the

[01:17:42] wireless

[01:17:43] stemmed

[01:17:43] from the

[01:17:44] military

[01:17:44] implications

[01:17:45] that many

[01:17:45] saw

[01:17:46] in it

[01:17:46] of course

[01:17:47] the military

[01:17:48] implications

[01:17:49] right

[01:17:49] as early

[01:17:50] as 1897

[01:17:51] marconi himself

[01:17:52] had pointed

[01:17:53] out the

[01:17:53] military

[01:17:54] potential

[01:17:54] of wireless

[01:17:55] telegraphy

[01:17:56] for exploding

[01:17:57] gunpowder

[01:17:58] and the

[01:17:58] magazines

[01:17:59] of ships

[01:18:00] from a

[01:18:00] distance

[01:18:00] he clearly

[01:18:02] had military

[01:18:02] uses in

[01:18:03] mind

[01:18:03] when discussing

[01:18:04] the urgency

[01:18:05] of improved

[01:18:06] tuning

[01:18:06] others noted

[01:18:07] the prospects

[01:18:08] for steering

[01:18:09] torpedoes

[01:18:10] firing mines

[01:18:11] and blowing

[01:18:11] up forts

[01:18:12] with radio

[01:18:13] waves

[01:18:13] going to

[01:18:14] pause

[01:18:14] for a

[01:18:14] moment

[01:18:14] here

[01:18:15] so now

[01:18:16] all of

[01:18:16] these

[01:18:16] implications

[01:18:17] are here

[01:18:18] as well

[01:18:20] think about

[01:18:21] this

[01:18:21] they're talking

[01:18:24] about using

[01:18:26] radio waves

[01:18:28] to destroy

[01:18:30] targets

[01:18:31] to explode

[01:18:31] gunpowder

[01:18:32] and the

[01:18:35] magazines

[01:18:35] of ships

[01:18:36] from a

[01:18:36] distance

[01:18:37] steering

[01:18:37] torpedoes

[01:18:38] blowing up

[01:18:39] forts

[01:18:39] with radio

[01:18:40] waves

[01:18:40] the Tesla

[01:18:42] death ray

[01:18:42] which is

[01:18:43] a reality

[01:18:44] by the way

[01:18:46] all of

[01:18:47] these things

[01:18:48] were discussed

[01:18:49] early on

[01:18:50] as being

[01:18:52] potentials

[01:18:53] in the

[01:18:54] military

[01:18:54] industrial

[01:18:55] complex

[01:18:55] for this

[01:18:56] now of

[01:18:57] course

[01:18:57] this was

[01:18:58] the early

[01:18:58] phases

[01:18:59] of the

[01:18:59] military

[01:19:00] industrial

[01:19:00] complex

[01:19:01] it really

[01:19:02] didn't

[01:19:02] come to

[01:19:03] full

[01:19:04] manifestation

[01:19:04] until

[01:19:05] sometime

[01:19:06] around

[01:19:07] the

[01:19:07] second

[01:19:07] world

[01:19:07] war

[01:19:08] surrounding

[01:19:08] the

[01:19:09] second

[01:19:09] world

[01:19:09] war

[01:19:09] this

[01:19:10] is

[01:19:10] when

[01:19:10] the

[01:19:10] military

[01:19:11] industrial

[01:19:11] complex

[01:19:12] as we

[01:19:12] know

[01:19:12] it

[01:19:13] properly

[01:19:13] today

[01:19:13] really

[01:19:14] came

[01:19:15] into

[01:19:15] fruition

[01:19:16] came

[01:19:16] into

[01:19:16] formation

[01:19:17] unto

[01:19:17] its

[01:19:17] own

[01:19:18] now

[01:19:18] some

[01:19:18] of

[01:19:18] its

[01:19:18] roots

[01:19:19] could

[01:19:19] be

[01:19:19] traced

[01:19:19] back

[01:19:19] to

[01:19:20] world

[01:19:20] war

[01:19:20] one

[01:19:20] as

[01:19:21] well

[01:19:21] but

[01:19:21] this

[01:19:22] wasn't

[01:19:23] really

[01:19:23] truly

[01:19:23] what

[01:19:24] we

[01:19:24] would

[01:19:24] accept

[01:19:25] in

[01:19:25] the

[01:19:25] modern

[01:19:25] era

[01:19:25] as

[01:19:26] the

[01:19:26] military

[01:19:26] industrial

[01:19:27] complex

[01:19:27] at

[01:19:28] that

[01:19:28] point

[01:19:28] now

[01:19:29] this

[01:19:29] is

[01:19:29] when

[01:19:30] everything

[01:19:30] began

[01:19:30] to

[01:19:30] become

[01:19:31] interconnected

[01:19:32] is

[01:19:32] during

[01:19:32] some

[01:19:33] point

[01:19:34] in the

[01:19:36] phases of

[01:19:37] World

[01:19:37] War

[01:19:37] War

[01:19:39] when

[01:19:39] it

[01:19:39] all

[01:19:39] kind

[01:19:40] of

[01:19:40] came

[01:19:40] together

[01:19:40] and

[01:19:41] everything

[01:19:41] kind

[01:19:41] of

[01:19:41] cycles

[01:19:42] through

[01:19:42] the

[01:19:42] military

[01:19:43] industrial

[01:19:43] complex

[01:19:44] now

[01:19:44] before

[01:19:45] it gets

[01:19:46] out there

[01:19:46] for public

[01:19:47] consumption

[01:19:47] now

[01:19:48] at this

[01:19:49] time

[01:19:49] this was

[01:19:49] kind

[01:19:50] of a

[01:19:50] mixed

[01:19:50] bag

[01:19:50] with

[01:19:51] the

[01:19:51] early

[01:19:51] invention

[01:19:52] of radio

[01:19:53] broadcasting

[01:19:53] was

[01:19:54] out there

[01:19:55] for

[01:19:55] marketing

[01:19:55] uses

[01:19:56] for

[01:19:56] commercial

[01:19:56] uses

[01:19:57] and

[01:19:57] the

[01:19:58] military

[01:19:58] picked

[01:19:58] up

[01:19:59] on

[01:19:59] it

[01:19:59] and

[01:20:00] decided

[01:20:00] to

[01:20:00] run

[01:20:00] with

[01:20:01] it

[01:20:01] and

[01:20:01] do

[01:20:01] different

[01:20:01] things

[01:20:02] and

[01:20:02] of course

[01:20:02] Marconi

[01:20:03] had

[01:20:03] military

[01:20:04] uses

[01:20:04] in mind

[01:20:05] as he

[01:20:05] pointed

[01:20:05] out

[01:20:06] here

[01:20:07] so

[01:20:07] let's

[01:20:07] get back

[01:20:08] to this

[01:20:08] though

[01:20:09] the

[01:20:10] point

[01:20:10] to

[01:20:10] point

[01:20:10] model

[01:20:11] for

[01:20:11] the

[01:20:11] wireless

[01:20:12] did

[01:20:12] not

[01:20:12] however

[01:20:13] preclude

[01:20:13] non

[01:20:14] military

[01:20:14] uses

[01:20:14] the

[01:20:15] perfection

[01:20:15] of

[01:20:16] tuning

[01:20:16] would

[01:20:17] ensure

[01:20:17] the

[01:20:17] secrecy

[01:20:18] of

[01:20:18] different

[01:20:18] kinds

[01:20:18] of

[01:20:19] messages

[01:20:19] Ray

[01:20:20] Standard

[01:20:20] Baker

[01:20:21] who

[01:20:22] reported

[01:20:22] on

[01:20:22] Marconi's

[01:20:23] achievements

[01:20:23] in

[01:20:24] 1902

[01:20:24] thus

[01:20:25] projected

[01:20:25] a

[01:20:25] not

[01:20:26] distant

[01:20:26] future

[01:20:27] where

[01:20:27] organizations

[01:20:28] and even

[01:20:29] families

[01:20:29] could

[01:20:30] secure

[01:20:30] their

[01:20:30] own

[01:20:31] private

[01:20:31] frequencies

[01:20:32] great

[01:20:33] telegraph

[01:20:34] companies

[01:20:34] will

[01:20:34] each

[01:20:35] have

[01:20:35] its

[01:20:35] own

[01:20:35] tuned

[01:20:36] instruments

[01:20:36] to

[01:20:37] receive

[01:20:37] only

[01:20:37] its

[01:20:38] own

[01:20:38] messages

[01:20:38] and

[01:20:39] there

[01:20:39] may

[01:20:40] be

[01:20:40] special

[01:20:40] tunes

[01:20:41] for

[01:20:41] each

[01:20:41] of

[01:20:42] the

[01:20:42] important

[01:20:42] governments

[01:20:43] of

[01:20:43] the

[01:20:43] world

[01:20:43] or

[01:20:44] perhaps

[01:20:44] for

[01:20:45] the

[01:20:45] system

[01:20:45] can

[01:20:46] be

[01:20:46] operated

[01:20:46] very

[01:20:47] cheaply

[01:20:47] the

[01:20:48] time

[01:20:48] will

[01:20:48] even

[01:20:48] come

[01:20:49] when

[01:20:49] the

[01:20:49] great

[01:20:50] banking

[01:20:50] houses

[01:20:50] and

[01:20:51] business

[01:20:51] houses

[01:20:52] or

[01:20:52] even

[01:20:52] families

[01:20:53] and

[01:20:53] friends

[01:20:53] will

[01:20:54] each

[01:20:54] have

[01:20:54] its

[01:20:55] own

[01:20:55] wireless

[01:20:55] system