Tesla's DeathRay... Fact Or Fiction?

[00:00:00] Discover the amazing clinically proven health benefits of Original Tahitian Noni. Original

[00:00:05] Tahitian Noni includes powerful antioxidants, adaptogens, nutrients and phytonutrients to

[00:00:11] naturally boost energy levels, immune system function and overall health meticulously sourced

[00:00:16] from French Polynesia. This is the original superfruit, except no imitations. Original

[00:00:22] Tahitian Noni. Visit ATR Health at alchemicaltechrevolution.com and click on the

[00:00:28] shop here tab for more details.

[00:00:58] You're listening to the Alchemical Tech Revolution and I am your host, Wayne McRoy. Good evening,

[00:01:27] good morning wherever you are around the world tonight we're going to discuss Tesla's Death Ray

[00:01:34] or Fiction. There's a lot of scientific developments that have come out in recent years

[00:01:41] that align heavily with the technologies that Nikola Tesla envisioned in his mind and in his

[00:01:48] notes and in his notebooks and there's a lot of speculation and curiosity as to Tesla's Death Ray.

[00:01:55] You see shortly before his death in 1943 he had gone public to the press about a decade prior to that

[00:02:06] and began to talk about the development of a Death Ray. This weapon that could be used

[00:02:14] to use a direct energy beam to destroy aircraft at a distance of about 250 miles or more.

[00:02:23] He was developing these things in his notes, in his inventions,

[00:02:33] and at his various laboratories that he had established.

[00:02:38] One in Colorado and of course the other one, his latest one, his last known laboratory

[00:02:48] at Wardenclyffe on Long Island. Wardenclyffe, this was a very important place

[00:02:58] in the history of the development of modern technologies

[00:03:03] especially as it pertains to directed energy systems. This is where Tesla had developed

[00:03:14] some of his ideas and began to put the pieces together to build such a device.

[00:03:22] Not only as a Death Ray, you see Tesla envisioned the wireless delivery of electricity

[00:03:31] around the world. No wires! He actually was able to pull this off at his laboratory in

[00:03:37] Colorado that he had set up. He was actually able to light light bulbs at a distance of

[00:03:45] some 20 miles away from his tower that he set up there wirelessly. Now these technologies

[00:03:54] have been carefully tucked away from the public by those in the black budget community.

[00:04:01] You see they have developed these things.

[00:04:06] Do you really think they would let something with such potential

[00:04:09] just sit idly and just leave it go? Now they'll tell you that many of Tesla's visions

[00:04:18] were very much far-fetched, but were they really far-fetched? You see this is the guy that built

[00:04:27] the backbone of our modern infrastructure today. This is the guy that discovered the advent of

[00:04:35] alternating current electricity and transformed the world because of that.

[00:04:39] His inventions and patents are still used today everywhere. Everywhere electricity is generated

[00:04:48] there's a Tesla patent involved. And he envisioned the wireless transfer of electricity

[00:04:55] as well as radio waves as being a feasible possibility. And he demonstrated the feasibility

[00:05:03] of it. And only today are we beginning to see some of that coming to the public sector.

[00:05:13] These are technologies now in development and of course one of his most notorious inventions

[00:05:19] that he spoke about is the death ray. Essentially it's a directed lightning bolt

[00:05:26] that can be used for massive destructive capacity as a weapon. And if you think

[00:05:33] that the intelligence community and the military industrial complex let this escape their purview

[00:05:39] you are sorely mistaken. There's a lot of mystery surrounding what happened to Tesla's

[00:05:45] notes after his death in 1943. You see when his body was discovered somebody had rummaged through

[00:05:57] his safe, broken open his safe and stole some of his notes. His notes were missing.

[00:06:03] There were some things missing before the FBI even went in to confiscate the rest of his notes

[00:06:09] and notebooks. And then there was this trail of obscurity that followed. They kept these things

[00:06:19] stored away for a number of years before his relatives in Serbia

[00:06:24] had petitioned the U.S. government to send all of his belongings to Serbia. And there's actually

[00:06:32] a museum in Serbia dedicated to Nikola Tesla and his work. And some researchers have gotten

[00:06:38] access to some of the hidden notes and notebooks in this museum and have been able

[00:06:46] to piece together bits of his patents and drawings about this death ray. Now many have

[00:06:56] speculated that Tesla was actually murdered. Now this is an interesting idea. I mean Tesla was

[00:07:04] well into his 80s when he died in 1943 so it is more likely that he died of old age but

[00:07:10] there's still always been this speculation by researchers that he was murdered for his

[00:07:15] death ray patents. And certainly we see motivation in certain places for doing this.

[00:07:25] And there have been some obscure claims made. One claim being made by a guy in Florida who claimed

[00:07:31] to have gotten he claims to have gotten a deathbed confession from somebody involved in the

[00:07:39] deathbed confession from somebody involved in the murder of Tesla. Now this can't be fully vetted

[00:07:47] out or proved or disproven. This is all speculation and hearsay but this guy claimed

[00:07:58] to be Otto Scorzini. This guy who gave the deathbed confession in 1997 just prior to his

[00:08:06] passing to another individual in Florida. He claimed he was Otto Scorzini

[00:08:13] and that he was involved in the murder of Nikola Tesla himself and Reinhard Gellin which if you're

[00:08:20] not familiar with who Reinhard Gellin is this is the guy who was one of the original founders

[00:08:28] and directors of what's known as the OSS, the Office of Strategic Services, which is

[00:08:33] the precursor to the CIA here in the US. And he was a German agent but he was a double agent

[00:08:40] working for the allied powers and also working within the Nazi party. And the claim from this

[00:08:48] gentleman who died at a ripe old age of 93 or something like that in 1997, he claimed he

[00:08:55] was Otto Scorzini and that he himself and Reinhard Gellin actually were the ones who

[00:09:00] murdered Tesla in his hotel room and took his notes. Now there is not any evidence to support

[00:09:08] this but this is a claim that was made by an individual who claims that he knew this guy

[00:09:16] who claimed to be Otto Scorzini and made this deathbed confession. A lot of it's based on

[00:09:24] speculation and hearsay as I said but there are those who took this claim very seriously

[00:09:31] and it seems that there was possible motivation for the murder of Tesla in taking this patent

[00:09:37] for the death ray because it would seem that this technology had the very potential

[00:09:43] to change outcomes of various war strategies were anyone able to develop it to its fulfillment

[00:09:53] and utilize it. And of course I would argue since that time these ideas have been taken hold

[00:10:01] of by the military industrial complex and run through the gamut of possibilities. So what do we

[00:10:08] know about Tesla's death ray? Well tonight we're going to read from a website, Tesla Research,

[00:10:18] Open Tesla Research that has a collection of many of his articles and patents

[00:10:26] and various information about this. What's the reality behind the death ray? Is there a real

[00:10:32] technology there? Is it something that truly existed and or exists today? What can we determine

[00:10:39] about this? What do we know? And who if anyone has access to these patents and what can we

[00:10:53] determine from this? So these questions we're going to take a look at here.

[00:10:59] The death ray and it gives a drawing here of what this looked like and essentially

[00:11:06] it looks very much like what Tesla's Ward and Cliff tower looked like. See it had the little

[00:11:13] laboratory or powerhouse at the bottom. It had a large tower and on top of the tower a sphere.

[00:11:24] Tesla explained in many articles about experiments or inventions that could produce effects at

[00:11:34] considerable distances. He described different phenomena which seems to have different nature

[00:11:39] between each other. Despite his statements about this concept, it has never been demonstrated

[00:11:48] today that there exists the concept of directed energy weapons which is applied in different

[00:11:52] weapons for the military defense to produce effects at a distance. I'm going to pause for

[00:11:58] a moment here folks and I will take umbrage with what is claimed here right at the outset

[00:12:04] from this Open Tesla Research. I don't know how old this website is but certainly directed

[00:12:10] energy weapons are a real thing in operation today and the military does utilize them.

[00:12:18] And then it gives an article from Electrical Review magazine from March 18th, 1896 wherein

[00:12:24] Tesla's latest results are put in print. He now produces radiographs at a distance of more than

[00:12:31] 40 feet. I am producing strong shadows at distances of 40 feet. I repeat 40 feet and even

[00:12:37] more nor is this all so strong are the actions on the film that provisions must be made to guard

[00:12:43] the plates in my photographic department located on the floor above a distance of fully 60 feet

[00:12:49] from being spoiled by long exposure to the stray rays. Though during my investigations I have

[00:12:55] performed many experiments which seemed extraordinary, I am deeply astonished observing

[00:13:00] these unexpected manifestations and still more so as even now I see before me the possibility

[00:13:06] not to say certitude of augmenting the effects with my apparatus at least ten

[00:13:12] fold. These effects upon the sensitive plate at so great a distance I attribute to the employment

[00:13:18] of a bulb with a single terminal which permits the use of practically any desired potential

[00:13:24] and the attainment of extraordinary speeds of the projected particles. With such a bulb it is

[00:13:31] also evident that the action upon a fluorescent screen is proportionately greater than when the

[00:13:36] usual kind of tube is employed and I have already observed enough to feel sure that great

[00:13:41] developments are to be looked for in this direction." That is directly from Nikola Tesla

[00:13:50] March 18th, 1896 Electrical Review Magazine. So as early as 1896 this guy was observing

[00:14:00] phenomena and building apparatus to utilize this phenomena to certain effects. Now it was said

[00:14:15] largely that by the mid 1930s is when he had the initial revelation of the death ray

[00:14:24] and how he was able to actually in his mind build the machine. This is how Tesla operated.

[00:14:32] He had a unique mind he was able to produce in his mind only, now mind you

[00:14:40] and this is an interesting claim but this is what all the Tesla researchers say.

[00:14:45] They say he was able to actually in his mind's eye build these machines and test them

[00:14:51] to know whether they worked or not before he would put anything even to paper about it.

[00:14:56] This guy was a true genius of course he was very quirky too. He was able to produce

[00:15:05] these different ideas in his head before he put them on paper and a lot of the things

[00:15:09] it is claimed by those that research this he didn't necessarily put to paper

[00:15:15] a lot of these ideas he kept in his head because he didn't want people to steal them

[00:15:21] and misuse them. So let's continue on with this Tesla research here. Today we know that x-rays

[00:15:31] are a form of invisible high frequency electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths between 10 and 0.01

[00:15:38] nanometers corresponding to a frequency of 30 pHZ to 3 EHZ. They are produced by accelerating

[00:15:50] electrons at a metal target. In medical application this is tungstrin, rhenium or molybdenum.

[00:15:58] X-rays are used in various medical applications. I'm going to pause there so Tesla is also

[00:16:05] accredited with finding x-rays. This is the guy that invented x-ray technology. You see there

[00:16:12] are many things that we could attribute to Tesla. Radar, x-rays, wireless communication,

[00:16:24] AC electricity. This is the guy that built the modern foundations of our society

[00:16:32] and he largely goes unrecognized in the history books. He was a true genius and he understood

[00:16:38] and experimented with electricity in ways that people today don't do.

[00:16:44] There are some exceptions, don't get me wrong. There are still some of those

[00:16:49] who have a better grasp of how this all works than myself

[00:16:54] and have utilized Tesla's techniques and technologies to be able to produce some

[00:17:00] results and come to some startling conclusions. But certainly it escapes the attention of the

[00:17:07] mainstream. Let's continue here. In 1907 when commenting on the destruction of the French

[00:17:14] ship Iena, Tesla noted in a letter to the New York Times that he has built and tested remotely

[00:17:20] controlled torpedoes but that electrical waves would be more destructive. And this is another

[00:17:26] quote from Tesla, quote, as to projecting wave energy to any particular region of the globe

[00:17:32] This can be done by my devices, he wrote.

[00:17:36] Further he claims that quote, the spot at which the desired effect is to be produced can be

[00:17:41] calculated very closely assuming the accepted terrestrial measurements to be correct, end quote.

[00:17:47] In 1908 Tesla repeated the idea of destruction by electrical waves to the newspaper.

[00:17:53] On April 21st his letter to the editor stated, quote, this is directly from Tesla,

[00:17:59] quote,

[00:18:02] When I spoke of future warfare, I meant that it should be conducted by direct application

[00:18:07] of electrical waves without the use of aerial engines or other implements of destruction.

[00:18:13] He also added, this is not a dream. Even now wireless power plants could be constructed

[00:18:19] by which any region of the globe might be rendered uninhabitable without subjecting

[00:18:24] the population of other parts to serious danger or inconvenience, end quote.

[00:18:32] That was in 1908 folks. He was talking about this. Now certainly, certainly we can see how

[00:18:43] much of these ideas have been hidden away. Probably sounded very much like a pipe dream

[00:18:50] to a lot of people back then. But today these things seem feasible don't they?

[00:18:57] Again in 1915, in another letter to the editor, Tesla stated, quote, this is 1915,

[00:19:04] quote, It is perfectly practical to transmit electrical energy without wires and produce

[00:19:10] destructive effects at a distance. I have already constructed a wireless transmitter

[00:19:15] which makes this possible. When unavoidable, the transmitter may be used to destroy property

[00:19:23] and life, end quote. 1915 Tesla claims to have already built this wireless electricity

[00:19:33] which can be used as a dual use technology. It could be used to destroy things if necessary,

[00:19:46] but it could also be used to transmit electricity wirelessly. Now this is a fantastic

[00:19:56] type of a claim that's being made. But was this feasible? Is it feasible? Well Tesla claims

[00:20:03] he was able to do this in 1915. He'd already done so. And then there's a little snippet here,

[00:20:14] a picture and an article that there's a link to that asks the question,

[00:20:21] this is from October 1st, 1919, can radio ignite balloons? And this is from Electrical

[00:20:27] Experimenter magazine, October 1st, 1919. Another story from Tesla, but here is a headline,

[00:20:38] a clip from a headline from the New York Times from December 8th, 1915. And it says Tesla's

[00:20:45] new device like a bolts of Thor. He seeks to patent wireless engine for destroying navies

[00:20:51] by pulling a lever to shatter armies also. That's what the headline states, New York Times,

[00:20:58] December 8th, 1915. So he was beginning to speak about this stuff early on,

[00:21:04] not even up into the 1930s, but this is when it all seemed to become more feasible,

[00:21:10] the mass production of these types of devices that could transmit wireless electricity and

[00:21:17] possibly weaponize it. You see, those within the auspices of the military industrial complex

[00:21:24] had a keen interest in the things Tesla was saying because these technologies

[00:21:32] could potentially become dual use, as all things do within the auspices of the military

[00:21:41] black budget projects. So they had a keen interest in what this guy was doing and

[00:21:47] they were watching him very closely, make no doubt about that. Then there's an article here

[00:21:53] called Tesla's views on electricity and the war. This is also from the Electrical Experimenter

[00:21:59] magazine from August of 1917. And here is the quote, quote, At the time of those tests I

[00:22:07] succeeded in producing the most powerful X-rays ever seen. I could stand at a distance of 100

[00:22:12] feet from the X-ray apparatus and see the bones of the hand clearly with the aid of a

[00:22:17] fluoroscope screen. And I could have easily seen them at a distance several times this

[00:22:22] by utilizing suitable power. In fact, I could not then produce X-ray generators to handle even a

[00:22:28] small fraction of the power I had available. But I now have apparatus designed whereby this

[00:22:34] tremendous energy of hundreds of kilowatts can be successfully transformed into X-rays.

[00:22:42] By the same month, Tesla outlined a concept for a primitive radar like unit. He stated, quote,

[00:22:49] By their electromagnetic waves use, we may be able to produce at will from sending a station

[00:22:56] an electrical effect in any particular region of the globe with which we may determine

[00:23:01] the relative position or course of a moving object such as a vessel at sea

[00:23:06] at the distance traversed by the same or its speed. End quote. Tesla's 1917 proposal for

[00:23:13] directed energy submarine warfare. Also coming from this electrical experimenter magazine,

[00:23:23] two articles, Tesla's views on electricity in the war and new Yankee tricks to circumvent

[00:23:30] the U-boat from the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette from August of the same year.

[00:23:36] And both of these sources, quote, Tesla is saying, quote,

[00:23:46] might prove very practical in locating a hidden submarine. And it is, of course,

[00:23:50] of paramount importance that we do find means of accurately locating these subsea fighters

[00:23:56] when they are submerged so that we can with this information be ready to close in on them

[00:24:01] when they attempt to come to the surface. Especially is this important when several

[00:24:06] vessels are traveling in fleet formation, the location and presence of the enemy submarine can

[00:24:11] and be radiographed to the other vessels by the one doing the magnetic surveying,

[00:24:16] and by means of nets in some cases or gunfire,

[00:24:19] and the use of hydroaeroplanes sent aloft from the ships,

[00:24:23] the enemy underwater stands a mighty good chance

[00:24:27] of being either bombed, shelled, or netted."

[00:24:32] So Tesla in 1917, August of 1917,

[00:24:39] was talking about radar sonar, all of these different ideas that were applications of some

[00:24:45] of his technologies. Tesla was incorrect in his assumption that high radio frequency waves would

[00:24:53] penetrate water, but Emil Gerardo, who had developed France's first radar system in the

[00:25:00] 1930s, noted in 1953 that Tesla's general speculation that a very strong high-frequency

[00:25:07] signal would be needed was correct, stating,

[00:25:09] Tesla was prophesying or dreaming since he had at his disposal no means of carrying them out,

[00:25:15] but one must add that if he was dreaming, at least he was dreaming correctly."

[00:25:21] So Tesla came up with many of the ideas that underlie radar technologies and sonar technologies.

[00:25:31] But let's get more into some of the more interesting aspects

[00:25:35] of this, the topic at hand. The death ray.

[00:25:38] On July 11, 1934, the inventor described a new weapon for the first time in the New York Sun

[00:25:44] and the New York Times as being able to be used against ground-based infantry or for

[00:25:49] anti-aircraft purposes. The press called it a peace ray, or death ray.

[00:25:57] I'm going to pause for a moment here.

[00:26:01] You see, the press tried to spin it at that time. They called it a peace ray.

[00:26:06] And this was just prior to the onset of World War II that he began talking about this.

[00:26:12] A weapon that could end all warfare. That's essentially what this was. This was the proposal

[00:26:20] of an anti-aircraft defense system, an anti-infantry defense system, an anti-naval defense system.

[00:26:30] You see, this could be used with precision to destroy targets at a good distance

[00:26:40] using just electricity. Essentially a directed lightning bolt.

[00:26:44] That's how Tesla had envisioned this. This was 1934, so he began speaking publicly about this.

[00:26:52] You see how he hinted at these things earlier and said he was able to build this back in 1915.

[00:26:59] So here we are some almost 20 years later, and he began talking about this publicly.

[00:27:06] He probably stayed or remained silent after his initial statements on this because of the Great

[00:27:13] War, World War I going on at the point that he claimed he was able to develop this.

[00:27:21] But now in the 1930s he thought it apropos to mention that he has

[00:27:29] these technologies that can end all wars if applied properly.

[00:27:37] It could be used as a defense, as a deterrent for warfare of any type.

[00:27:43] And thus the press called it a peace ray. But of course it later became known as the death ray

[00:27:50] and that's probably a more apropos name for it. Tesla announced to the world two astonishing

[00:27:56] new inventions. The first was a particle beam projector that Tesla intended to be used as an

[00:28:02] instrument of national defense. He called his system TeleForce. With this machine he declared

[00:28:09] that a nation could bring wholesale destruction upon invading armies and shoot down fleets of

[00:28:14] incoming aircraft at a distance of 200 miles away. Well the basic beam weapon concept was

[00:28:20] first revealed in 1934. On Tesla's 78th birthday specific details about the actual device

[00:28:26] have been difficult to obtain. And I'm going to pause for a moment there folks.

[00:28:30] You see back in 2016 the FBI declassified documents pertaining to the seizure of Tesla's notes.

[00:28:40] And many things came to the surface at that point.

[00:28:44] Many things came to the surface. There were hidden notes

[00:28:49] that many people were unaware of, not only at the Tesla museum in Serbia.

[00:28:54] But there were pieces missing. Now eyewitness testimonies

[00:28:59] who had obtained these documents for the museum in Serbia from the FBI claim

[00:29:06] that there were pages missing from his notes. So there's been a lot of speculation that the US

[00:29:11] government had seized many of these important documents pertaining to Tesla's death rate.

[00:29:22] And of course it's only speculation. You can't really prove it because they like to hide their

[00:29:26] footprints very well. But certainly there were notes that were unrevealed to the public

[00:29:31] before that time in those documents in the Serbian museum that they kept tucked away and

[00:29:38] hidden away for various purposes, mostly political purposes. But these things have now

[00:29:47] surfaced and come to the light of day. There were notes obtained from the FBI

[00:29:52] around 2017 or 2018 which began to show more details about Tesla's death ray that he envisioned

[00:30:06] and potentially built. And we'll see here a little bit more about that. But in 1934 on his

[00:30:17] 78th birthday is when he began to release some specific details about his idea of a beam weapon,

[00:30:27] a death ray. One year later during his annual birthday press conference on July 10, 1935, Tesla

[00:30:35] claimed a method to transmit mechanical energy with minimal loss over any terrestrial distance

[00:30:41] allowing for a new means of communication and a technique for the location of subterranean

[00:30:46] mineral deposits. Tesla's mechanical power transmission system he dubbed it

[00:30:52] the art of telegeodynamics and it was based primarily upon his reciprocating engine invention

[00:30:59] patented in 1894. While the fundamental operating principles of Tesla's mechanical oscillator

[00:31:06] are well understood, little has been said about how this machine would have been used

[00:31:11] for underground prospecting. Going to pause for a moment here folks. Ground penetrating radar.

[00:31:21] Essentially that's what he's talking about. A type of ground penetrating radar

[00:31:26] that he was able to develop with this engine patent that he invented in 1894.

[00:31:35] This guy was way ahead of his time. You see had this guy been properly funded

[00:31:43] and had enough brilliant minds working with him in the development of some of these

[00:31:48] technologies our world would look very different today. But of course those greedy

[00:31:56] benefactors who were funding his work didn't like the prospect of not being able to profit

[00:32:06] off of his inventions. So they cut his funding. J.P. Morgan being one of his primary financiers

[00:32:15] who has famously done so. He's famously quoted to have said how do I put a meter on that

[00:32:23] when Tesla was referring to the wireless transmission of electricity.

[00:32:29] These are the kinds of things Tesla was working on at his Wardenclyffe laboratory

[00:32:37] and of course the power structure at that time didn't want to lose control

[00:32:47] of their monopoly on energy. And it's the same thing going on today. So we have this notion here

[00:32:55] Tesla was developing these technologies that could potentially wirelessly transmit electricity

[00:33:01] could be used in a number of applications he had a profound understanding of how electricity

[00:33:08] works that's still lost on our sciences today. In Leland Anderson's newest book Nikola Tesla's

[00:33:17] Teleforce and Telegeodynamics proposals these two important papers hidden for more than 60 years

[00:33:24] are presented for the first time. The principles behind teleforce the particle beam weapon

[00:33:29] and telegeodynamics the mechanical earth resonance concept for seismic exploration

[00:33:35] are fully addressed and I'm going to pause before we continue. This

[00:33:42] telegeodynamics mechanical earth resonance concept this is probably the basis for the legend of

[00:33:51] Tesla's earthquake machine. Now was this a real device? It seems plausible based upon what we

[00:34:01] know about resonant frequency. Using resonant frequency you could attune a certain location

[00:34:13] to a certain frequency and cause certain destructive effects by maintaining that.

[00:34:21] So this also seems like a feasible weapon system that could have been developed from

[00:34:27] these same technologies explored by Tesla the beam weapon and the telegeodynamic system.

[00:34:41] In addition to copies of the original documents typed on Tesla's official stationary this

[00:34:47] work also includes two reader's aid sections that guide the reader through the more technical

[00:34:51] aspects of each paper. The papers are followed by commentary sections which provide historical

[00:34:57] background and functional explanations of the two devices. Significant newspaper articles and

[00:35:03] headline accounts are provided to document the first mention of these proposals. A large

[00:35:08] appendix provides a wealth of related material and background information followed by a

[00:35:13] bibliography section and index. And just to repeat this book is titled Nikola Tesla's

[00:35:21] Teleforce and Telegeodynamics Proposals by Leland Anderson. If you want to look up that book

[00:35:28] I'm sure there's some very interesting information in there pertaining to these technologies.

[00:35:36] So Tesla announced his new beam weapon in numerous newspaper interviews on his 78th birthday.

[00:35:42] In 1934 Tesla moved to his final residence room 3327 of the recently completed New Yorker hotel.

[00:35:52] I'm gonna pause for a second to point out 3327 is divisible by three Tesla was obsessed

[00:36:00] with the numbers three six and nine and he had a lot of obsessive compulsive type behaviors

[00:36:07] relating to these numbers with the various things he did in his daily life. You see like

[00:36:12] I said he was a genius but he was very quirky he would probably be considered autistic

[00:36:17] by today's standards in some of his behavioral aspects. That's a topic for another day though.

[00:36:30] But his eccentricities really show in his obsession with the numbers three six and nine

[00:36:37] and he did delegate some importance to these numbers and I think there's a foundational basis

[00:36:43] in nature for the use of these numbers in the applications and ways Tesla was referring to with

[00:36:51] them. Anyway in 1934 he moved to the New Yorker hotel where he lived alone with his ideas and

[00:37:02] his pigeons for the next decade. He posted a typewritten note on the door please do not

[00:37:07] disturb the occupant of this room. In Tesla's mind it was time to reveal his greatest invention

[00:37:15] a perfect and impossible idea a weapon to prevent world war two.

[00:37:20] I'm gonna pause for a moment so his idea of the death ray was to prevent warfare you see he

[00:37:27] saw it as a defense system he saw it as a means of stabbing off any type of conflict

[00:37:37] A deterrent. A nuclear deterrent before the ostensible or the claimed invention of nuclear weapons.

[00:37:48] A nuclear deterrent this was the original nuclear deterrent of sorts.

[00:37:56] On July 11th 1934 the headline on the front page of the New York Times announced quote

[00:38:02] And here's quotes from the article

[00:38:32] That's the end of the quote from this New York Times article. This was 1934 folks.

[00:38:54] Now in the 1980s the Reagan administration introduced the SDI platform the space-based weapon system.

[00:39:06] Star Wars defense you may remember that if you're old enough that operates on similar principles.

[00:39:14] But of course the technology at that time was far more advanced than what we thought at the time.

[00:39:25] When you consider Tesla was talking about this type of thing in the 1930s.

[00:39:32] This is how the special access programs of the military industrial complex operate.

[00:39:38] The technologies they develop and explore are bare minimum 30 to 50 years old.

[00:39:44] Older than what's represented in the public sector.

[00:39:48] So if you see a technology in the public sector as the newest state-of-the-art technology.

[00:39:54] Be assured it's already been put through its paces by the military industrial complex.

[00:40:00] And weaponized in every possible way that it can be by the black budget community.

[00:40:06] Then it is released for public consumption and for other usages.

[00:40:12] This is what's known as dual use technology.

[00:40:16] Always has a military operative back door built into it.

[00:40:24] A perfect example of this is your cell phone.

[00:40:28] It's a surveillance platform that they found other public sector uses for.

[00:40:36] But rest assured it has military back doors built into it.

[00:40:40] They can utilize it and I think that's demonstrable.

[00:40:45] I think this is one of the largely accepted dual use technologies that we have today.

[00:40:49] Just as an example.

[00:40:54] But what Tesla was talking about here.

[00:40:58] Was a nuclear deterrent before the ostensible invention of nuclear weapons.

[00:41:06] Let's continue here.

[00:41:08] Joseph Butler, a US Air Force expert on beam weapons has said of Tesla's idea.

[00:41:24] He said that he was going to use it to destroy some enemy airplanes in his particular case.

[00:41:28] But Butler added, I haven't a clue how he meant to actually do it.

[00:41:32] And that was in an interview in 1998 that this guy said this.

[00:41:36] So here's the thing.

[00:41:38] Once again we have a misconstruing of Tesla's ideas.

[00:41:42] Particles.

[00:41:46] Everything falls down to this notion of particles.

[00:41:52] In the cult of atomism.

[00:41:54] The quantum crowd.

[00:41:56] Everything's got to be a fundamental particle.

[00:41:58] Well when you begin to understand electricity doesn't function in that way.

[00:42:02] And I think Tesla understood this.

[00:42:04] It's not based on particles.

[00:42:08] That's not the reality.

[00:42:10] It's a reification, a man made reification so that they can mathematically

[00:42:16] Comp, compute, compute what they need to in an objective fashion.

[00:42:29] You see it's a quantification method of a thing that is not objectively quantifiable.

[00:42:35] In fact the electron itself is just a unit of measurement.

[00:42:39] It was never intended as a fundamental particle in its original conception.

[00:42:46] It was just a method for measuring electrical discharge.

[00:42:50] But of course we see what has happened since then and how our physics has been transformed

[00:42:56] In the modern era.

[00:42:58] With our modern science.

[00:43:00] But it's all about quantifying the concept.

[00:43:02] Make no mistake about that.

[00:43:04] The inventor envisioned war in the future as a mere contest between machines.

[00:43:10] This concept was illustrated by Paul Frank and appeared in Science and Invention from February 1922.

[00:43:18] Sensing a business opportunity, Tesla commissions architect Titus de Bobola in 1934

[00:43:26] To draw plans of what the new particle beam weapon towers might look like

[00:43:30] And contact several governments around the world to try to sell his plans.

[00:43:36] So Tesla was making a go at trying to convince nations to adopt this defense system as a deterrent to war.

[00:43:50] He was trying to sell his plans and he had this artist conceptualize what it would look like based upon his patents and his drawings.

[00:44:01] And of course it looks very much like the Wardenclyffe Tower.

[00:44:05] If you go back and look at the old photos.

[00:44:07] Except on top instead of a half sphere.

[00:44:09] It has a full sphere on top.

[00:44:11] Principles and concepts of Tesla's death ray.

[00:44:17] A New York Herald Tribune article from July 11th, 1934.

[00:44:23] The headline reads,

[00:44:25] Beam to kill army at 200 miles.

[00:44:27] Tesla's claim on 78th birthday.

[00:44:29] Quote,

[00:44:31] First and most important is a mechanism for producing rays and other energy manifestations in free air.

[00:44:37] Hitherto vacuum tubes have always been necessary.

[00:44:40] Second is an apparatus for producing unheard of quantities of electrical current and for controlling it when produced.

[00:44:47] The current is necessary as power for the first mechanism.

[00:44:51] Without this no rays of sufficient strength could be produced.

[00:44:55] The third is a method of intensifying and amplifying the second process.

[00:44:59] And the fourth is a method of producing tremendous electrical repellent force.

[00:45:05] End quote.

[00:45:07] On July 23rd, 1934, Time Magazine wrote an article about Tesla's death ray.

[00:45:13] Quote,

[00:45:15] Last week Dr. Tesla announced a combination of four inventions which would make war unthinkable.

[00:45:21] The nucleus of the idea is a death ray.

[00:45:24] A concentrated beam of submicroscopic particles.

[00:45:28] Flying at velocities approaching that of the speed of light.

[00:45:31] The beam, according to Tesla, would drop an army in its tracks.

[00:45:35] Bring down squadrons of airplanes 250 miles away.

[00:45:39] Inventor Tesla would discharge the ray by means of

[00:45:42] Number 1.

[00:45:43] A device to nullify the impeding effect of the atmosphere on the particles.

[00:45:48] Number 2.

[00:45:49] A method for setting up high potential.

[00:45:52] Number 3.

[00:45:53] A process for amplifying that potential to 50 million volts.

[00:45:58] And number 4.

[00:45:59] Creation of a tremendous electrical repelling force.

[00:46:03] According to Tesla, production of the particle beam is dependent upon the following four inventions.

[00:46:10] And these are outlined in an article called

[00:46:15] The New Art of Projecting Concentrated Non-Dispersive Energy Through Natural Media.

[00:46:20] And this is one of his patents.

[00:46:23] This is an article outlining his patent.

[00:46:27] Number 1.

[00:46:28] A method and apparatus for producing rays and other manifestations of energy in free air.

[00:46:33] Eliminating the high vacuum necessary at present for the production of such rays and beams.

[00:46:38] This is accomplished with a novel form of high vacuum tube.

[00:46:42] One end of which is open to the atmosphere.

[00:46:44] The projectiles are accelerated in a vacuum.

[00:46:47] And then conducted into the atmosphere through a valvular conduit.

[00:46:52] And he has drawings here of all of this.

[00:46:56] This is the actual patent for Tesla's death ray.

[00:47:00] The actual patent.

[00:47:04] Describing how it works.

[00:47:09] Number 2.

[00:47:10] A method and process for producing very great electrical force in the range of 60 million volts.

[00:47:15] To propel the particles to their objective.

[00:47:18] Tesla specified that this could be done with a large electrostatic generator.

[00:47:22] On a new principle and of very great power.

[00:47:26] In many respects similar to a Van de Graaff generator.

[00:47:29] In place of a charge carrying belt.

[00:47:32] It employs a circulating stream of desiccated air.

[00:47:36] That is propelled through a hermetically sealed ductwork by a Tesla disc blower.

[00:47:41] A Wardenclyffe type apparatus could also be used for this purpose.

[00:47:46] Going to pause for a moment here.

[00:47:49] So once again.

[00:47:51] We see built into Tesla's patent here.

[00:47:54] Dual use.

[00:47:57] Even by his own standards.

[00:47:59] Wardenclyffe.

[00:48:00] The original intention was the wireless transmission of electricity.

[00:48:05] Well when you can concentrate this electricity into a beam.

[00:48:10] As Tesla had proposed through his inventions here.

[00:48:14] And magnified.

[00:48:16] You can produce a beam weapon of massive destructive capacity.

[00:48:22] Number 3.

[00:48:25] A method for amplifying this process in the second invention.

[00:48:29] The exterior of the high potential terminal is equipped with numerous bulbs of some insulating material.

[00:48:34] Each containing an electrode of thin metal sheets suitably rounded.

[00:48:39] And exhausted to the highest vacuum obtainable.

[00:48:43] Number 4.

[00:48:45] A new method for producing a tremendous electrical repelling force in the form of.

[00:48:50] Provisions for impairing to a minute particle in an extremely high charge.

[00:48:56] It appears this refers to the internal conducting component.

[00:48:59] The socket and central extension at the base of the projector or gun element of the system.

[00:49:05] While these specific details about this aspect of the design are not readily apparent.

[00:49:10] It seems that strict attention to the fulfillment of requirements 1, 2 and 3 is critical to success.

[00:49:17] In Tesla's words.

[00:49:33] So Tesla really understood the potential behind this.

[00:49:41] So one of the key applications here.

[00:49:45] The original intention behind the tower that he was building at Wardenclyffe.

[00:49:50] And certainly this invention was the wireless transmission of electricity.

[00:49:54] Well when you could focus that into a type of a gun weapon.

[00:49:58] Which he had developed here with the death ray.

[00:50:01] It could be concentrated, magnified, amplified and used to great destructive effect.

[00:50:09] Essentially it is a directed lightning bolt.

[00:50:13] Tesla described the idea of the death ray as follows.

[00:50:17] A giant electrostatic generator run by one of his turbines to accelerate tiny particles of mercury.

[00:50:24] To produce such a beam of super high powered bullets of several million volts.

[00:50:29] Since they were accelerated in a vacuum.

[00:50:32] Tesla needed a way to spit them out of the accelerator sphere without letting air in.

[00:50:38] He proposed to do this with the special nozzle which blew high pressure air around an open tube.

[00:50:44] Leading to the evacuated sphere and acted like a constantly redoing plug to preserve the vacuum.

[00:50:50] What happens to the mercury stream after it left the nozzle.

[00:50:54] And had to travel through the atmosphere was another matter that was never quite figured out.

[00:51:00] So I'm going to pause for a moment.

[00:51:03] So now Tesla is talking about using mercury in this.

[00:51:08] So this is not just on the face of it an electrical discharge.

[00:51:14] This is actually sending real particles out there.

[00:51:17] So he was talking about actual particles.

[00:51:20] Just not electrical particles as many have misconstrued it.

[00:51:24] He was using mercury as a component here.

[00:51:29] Tiny microscopic particles of mercury being propelled by this energy beam.

[00:51:38] So this would be something akin to a bullet of sorts propelled at such high speed and velocity.

[00:51:50] It would cause massive destructive destructive capability.

[00:51:54] So this is what he was using.

[00:51:56] And I think he was thinking in terms of mercury because this would seal the energy.

[00:52:01] It would seal the vacuum tube as it left.

[00:52:05] And that's what he had in mind.

[00:52:08] So he's using actual physical particles as a type of weapon as a beam weapon.

[00:52:20] Now I don't know how this may have been taken into account in some of the military applications here of

[00:52:29] or how many of our technologies of what we would call beam weapons today have come about.

[00:52:35] It doesn't seem practical to have to implement mercury with this.

[00:52:40] But this also brings to mind the notion of the Nazi Bell Project.

[00:52:47] If you're familiar with the Bell Project, you know it said that it used a very similar type of mechanism here.

[00:52:57] Mercury. Mercury was used in the Bell Project.

[00:53:08] Now did it have something to do with Tesla's patents or Tesla's ideas of the death ray?

[00:53:14] What were the Nazis really working on with this Bell Project?

[00:53:18] Who knows?

[00:53:19] What we do know is the Germans had a vested interest in Tesla's technologies.

[00:53:24] As did the Russians, as did the Americans, as did many other people around the world.

[00:53:31] And many people were actually looking at this.

[00:53:38] But the question is what happens to the mercury stream after it left the nozzle and had to travel through the atmosphere

[00:53:43] was another matter that was never quite figured out, really.

[00:53:48] Maybe it was. But maybe they're not talking about that.

[00:53:53] In the death ray proposal, Tesla used the term particles,

[00:53:57] but he didn't mean atomic particles like protons, neutrons, etc.

[00:54:01] But he meant microscopic droplets accelerated in an electron tube by the action of the repulsion of the electrostatic force.

[00:54:10] So I'm going to pause here.

[00:54:13] So now we have this misnomer being addressed here.

[00:54:17] Tesla was talking about accelerating actual particles,

[00:54:21] microscopic particles of mercury at such high speeds and velocities with this electrical discharge

[00:54:28] that it could be propelled as a weapon.

[00:54:31] A physical weapon with destructive capacities that could potentially be unimaginable.

[00:54:41] They're not sure what would happen to this stream of mercury

[00:54:47] once it hits the atmosphere after it's discharged in this way and propelled.

[00:54:53] Well, this gives you, since it is a physical propulsive force being used here,

[00:55:00] akin to a gun in certain aspects, you would be able to aim this weapon then.

[00:55:10] This would give it the potential to steer and direct the bolt

[00:55:15] in the generalized direction where it would go.

[00:55:18] Now what would this look like? Would it look like a lightning discharge

[00:55:22] shooting a lightning bolt into the sky and striking down a target?

[00:55:26] Or would it be an invisible beam that's projected from this?

[00:55:32] It's hard to say for sure. Let's go ahead and continue here, though.

[00:55:39] The electrostatic attractions and repulsions between bodies of measurable dimensions are,

[00:55:46] of all the manifestations of this force, the first so-called electrical phenomena noted.

[00:55:51] But though they have been known to us for many centuries,

[00:55:55] the precise nature of the mechanism concerned in these actions is still unknown to us

[00:56:00] and has not been even quite satisfactorily explained.

[00:56:04] What kind of mechanism must that be?

[00:56:07] We cannot help wondering when we observe two magnets attracting and repelling each other

[00:56:11] with a force of hundreds of pounds, with apparently nothing between them.

[00:56:16] We have in our commercial dynamos magnets capable of sustaining, in mid-air, tons of weight.

[00:56:22] But what are even these forces acting between magnets

[00:56:29] when compared with the tremendous attractions and repulsions produced by electrostatic force,

[00:56:34] to which there is apparently no limit as to its intensity?

[00:56:38] In lightning discharges, bodies are often charged to so high a potential

[00:56:43] that they are thrown away with inconceivable force and torn asunder or shattered into fragments.

[00:56:49] Still, even such effects cannot compare with the attractions and repulsions

[00:56:53] which exist between charged molecules or atoms,

[00:56:57] and which are sufficient to project them with speeds of many kilometers a second,

[00:57:02] so that under their violent impact, bodies are rendered highly incandescent or are volatilized.

[00:57:09] It is of special interest for the thinker who inquires into the nature of these forces to note

[00:57:14] that whereas the actions between individual molecules or atoms occur seemingly under any conditions,

[00:57:20] the attractions and repulsions of bodies of measurable dimensions

[00:57:24] imply a medium possessing insulating properties.

[00:57:28] So, if air, either by being rarefied or heated, is rendered more or less conducting,

[00:57:34] these actions between two electrified bodies practically cease,

[00:57:38] while the actions between the individual atoms continue to manifest themselves.

[00:57:43] An experiment may serve as an illustration and as a means of bringing out other features of interest.

[00:57:50] Some time ago I showed that a lamp filament or wire mounted in a bulb

[00:57:55] and connected to one of the terminals of a high-tension secondary coil is set spinning,

[00:58:00] the top of the filament generally describing a circle.

[00:58:04] This vibration was very energetic when the air in the bulb was at an ordinary pressure

[00:58:09] and became less energetic when the air in the bulb was strongly compressed.

[00:58:14] It ceased altogether when the air was exhausted so as to become comparatively good conducting.

[00:58:20] I found at that time that no vibration took place when the bulb was very highly exhausted,

[00:58:27] but I conjectured that the vibration which I ascribed to the electrostatic action

[00:58:32] between the walls of the bulb and the filament should take place also in a highly exhausted bulb.

[00:58:38] To test this under conditions which were more favorable,

[00:58:42] a bulb like the one that I used was constructed.

[00:58:45] It comprised a globe in the neck of which was sealed a platinum wire with carrying a thin lamp filament.

[00:58:54] In the lower part of the tube, or sorry, in the lower part of the globe,

[00:58:59] a tube was sealed so as to surround the filament.

[00:59:02] The exhaustion was carried as far as it was practicable with the apparatus employed.

[00:59:08] This bulb verified my expectation for the filament was set spinning when the current was turned on and became incandescent.

[00:59:16] It also showed another interesting feature bearing upon the preceding marks namely,

[00:59:21] when the filament had been kept incandescent some time,

[00:59:24] the narrow tube and the space inside were brought to an elevated temperature

[00:59:28] and as the gas in the tube then became conducting,

[00:59:32] the electrostatic attraction between the glass and the filament became very weak or ceased and the filament came to rest.

[00:59:39] When it came to rest, it would glow far more intensely.

[00:59:43] This was probably due to its assuming the position in the center of the tube

[00:59:47] where the molecular bombardment was most intense

[00:59:50] and also partly to the fact that the individual impacts were more violent

[00:59:54] and that no part of the supplied energy was converted into mechanical movement.

[00:59:59] Since in accordance with the accepted views in this experiment,

[01:00:02] the incandescence must be attributed to the impacts of the particles, molecules or atoms in the heated space.

[01:00:08] These particles must therefore, in order to explain such action,

[01:00:12] be assumed to behave as independent carriers of electric charges immersed in an insulating medium.

[01:00:18] Yet there is no attractive force between the glass tube and the filament

[01:00:22] because the space in the tube is, as a whole, conducting.

[01:00:26] I'm going to continue on here.

[01:00:29] These are from Tesla himself, from his patent ideas.

[01:00:33] It is of some interest to observe in this connection

[01:00:38] that whereas the attraction between two electrified bodies may cease owing

[01:00:43] to the impairing of the insulating power of the medium in which they are immersed,

[01:00:48] the repulsion between the two bodies may still be observed.

[01:00:52] This may be explained in a plausible way.

[01:00:55] When the bodies are placed at some distance in a poorly conducting medium,

[01:00:59] such as slightly warmed or rarefied air, and are suddenly electrified,

[01:01:04] opposite electric charges being imparted to them,

[01:01:07] these charges equalize more or less by leakage through the air.

[01:01:12] But if the bodies are similarly electrified,

[01:01:15] there is less opportunity afforded for such dissipation.

[01:01:18] Hence the repulsion observed in such case is greater than the attraction.

[01:01:24] Repulsive actions in a gaseous medium are, however, as Professor Crooks has shown,

[01:01:29] enhanced by molecular bombardment.

[01:01:32] So I'm going to pause and let's translate some of that.

[01:01:36] So Tesla is talking about the potential to create

[01:01:43] a type of repulsive force through the use of this device.

[01:01:49] To push things away, repulsive force.

[01:01:54] So this could be an extremely destructive force if applied in that way.

[01:02:00] And this is one of the important ideas here.

[01:02:04] So he's talking about these potentials of electrical experimentation

[01:02:13] and these observations he made about not only magnetism,

[01:02:18] but electricity as well.

[01:02:19] And these are basically one in the same force, as described here by Tesla.

[01:02:29] They're one in the same force. They're separate manifestations.

[01:02:32] They're two sides of the same coin. Let's put it that way.

[01:02:35] Electricity and magnetism are just inherently related.

[01:02:39] It's called the dielectric field.

[01:02:42] That's how we know it today.

[01:02:43] And there were many researchers looking at how this operates and functions.

[01:02:46] And Tesla was looking at the application of using this electricity

[01:02:51] to produce results within a gaseous medium

[01:02:54] and being able to propel particles of that gaseous medium out into the air

[01:03:03] in order to produce a repulsion effect,

[01:03:06] which would create a very destructive bolt really.

[01:03:10] So now he's talking about using mercury in this system as well,

[01:03:16] along with this gas, to seal off the end of the tube

[01:03:20] to keep this thing from actually blowing to pieces really

[01:03:24] when it comes in contact with air.

[01:03:27] So was this a feasible technology?

[01:03:30] Seems there might be something to it.

[01:03:33] In some moment of his life,

[01:03:34] Tesla believed in the possibility of the atomic energy as a source of energy.

[01:03:38] But after some years of research,

[01:03:40] he stated just the opposite as a result of his experiments

[01:03:43] by accelerating and crushing atomic particles.

[01:03:46] For this reason, it is supposed that some kind of particle accelerator

[01:03:50] would be necessary to develop such experiments.

[01:03:53] However, the details are unknown.

[01:03:55] The utilization of electron tubes or cathode tubes

[01:03:59] is described in some articles and interviews about Tesla's death ray.

[01:04:04] So I'm going to pause here.

[01:04:05] There's an important thing to be taken out of this paragraph here

[01:04:10] that we just read from.

[01:04:12] It says some years after his research, he stated just the opposite.

[01:04:16] You see, early on, Tesla believed in the possibility

[01:04:20] of using atomic energy as a source of energy.

[01:04:24] The nuclear aspect, nuclear energy.

[01:04:28] But it does say here after some years of research,

[01:04:31] he stated just the opposite as a result of his experiments.

[01:04:34] You see, he experimented before the Manhattan Project

[01:04:39] on accelerating and crushing atomic particles in some of his apparatus.

[01:04:44] And the results he came to, the observations he made,

[01:04:51] led him to believe that seeking after this nuclear energy

[01:04:57] was a misnomer, wasn't going to be feasible.

[01:05:02] Keep that in mind.

[01:05:06] Now, this is a massively important detail

[01:05:08] that's lost on much of the public.

[01:05:10] Tesla did not condone or accept nuclear energy

[01:05:18] as has been presented to us in the modern era.

[01:05:23] His experiments contradicted that possibility.

[01:05:28] So what's really going on?

[01:05:30] Was he right? Was he wrong?

[01:05:33] Did he underestimate this?

[01:05:35] Certainly we have nuclear power plants and the like today.

[01:05:38] But essentially, what is this?

[01:05:40] Let's really look at this stuff for what it is.

[01:05:43] What powers the power plant?

[01:05:52] Well, essentially when it comes down to brass tacks,

[01:05:55] any power plant, whether it be a coal plant,

[01:05:58] a nuclear plant, whatever source of fuel they use,

[01:06:03] it's all about boiling water and creating steam.

[01:06:08] That's all that's done at a power plant.

[01:06:11] Power is a generator, a steam-powered generator.

[01:06:18] By the way, the generator patents are Tesla's patents

[01:06:21] to produce electricity.

[01:06:23] It's all about efficiently boiling water.

[01:06:26] So can nuclear energies be used to boil water?

[01:06:34] Possibly.

[01:06:36] But I don't think, according to Tesla's work here,

[01:06:40] it has the potential to be a standalone source

[01:06:45] of energy.

[01:06:46] You see, you need to do certain things with that

[01:06:52] in order to produce electricity.

[01:06:59] You don't just split an atom and it produces electricity.

[01:07:04] That's not how it works.

[01:07:06] You have to boil water and turn a turbine

[01:07:09] and a generator to produce electricity.

[01:07:12] And I think that's what Tesla was getting at here.

[01:07:15] So it didn't seem like a feasible source

[01:07:18] for producing results for him.

[01:07:21] Now, does that discredit all of nuclear theory?

[01:07:23] No, certainly not.

[01:07:28] But you have to understand, this guy was a genius

[01:07:31] unlike anything we see today.

[01:07:34] He was already doing the experiments

[01:07:39] and recording his observations way ahead of the game.

[01:07:43] And he was coming up with some ulterior results,

[01:07:47] opposite results of what the mainstream has pushed

[01:07:52] in the modern era.

[01:07:55] Now, is there some form of deception going on here?

[01:07:59] Was Tesla right and they were wrong?

[01:08:01] Or were they right and Tesla was wrong?

[01:08:03] I don't know. I don't have the answer to that.

[01:08:06] But what we do know for certain is there isn't

[01:08:11] certain off-the-books physics that is practiced

[01:08:15] within the special access programs

[01:08:17] of the military industrial complex.

[01:08:19] Things more closely associated and akin to Tesla's research

[01:08:23] than that of what is presented in the paper

[01:08:26] and not of what is presented in the mainstream

[01:08:28] as the modern state of the art.

[01:08:30] So is there a type of deception going on in this notion?

[01:08:36] Perhaps. Perhaps there is.

[01:08:39] I don't have the answers to that.

[01:08:42] We'll leave that open to speculation and debate,

[01:08:45] but Tesla certainly came to the conclusion

[01:08:49] he didn't think that nuclear power was a feasible thing.

[01:08:56] Or at least it didn't produce

[01:09:00] what they thought it was going to produce.

[01:09:03] Let's put it that way.

[01:09:06] So then here we have an article called

[01:09:08] Harnessing Nature. Can the Free Energy of Space be Utilized?

[01:09:12] This is from Scientific American, April 5th, 1913.

[01:09:16] Quote, Experiments conducted by Mr. Nikola Tesla

[01:09:20] with electromotive forces of 2 million volts

[01:09:23] have convinced him that if 100 million volts

[01:09:27] could be produced, it might be possible

[01:09:29] to break down the atomic structure of any element

[01:09:32] and thus liberate a certain amount of energy.

[01:09:35] But, he told the writer of this article,

[01:09:38] even if the feat could be accomplished

[01:09:40] and sufficient energy set free,

[01:09:42] there still remains the enormously difficult problem

[01:09:44] of devising means of utilizing the energy

[01:09:47] in a practical way.

[01:09:49] So I'm going to pause there.

[01:09:51] So Tesla is not outside considering

[01:09:57] that a tremendous amount of energy can be released

[01:10:01] by doing that, but he proposes going about it

[01:10:05] in a different way.

[01:10:07] By producing 100 million volts

[01:10:11] to break down the atomic structure.

[01:10:14] Now he doesn't think this seems practical.

[01:10:17] Because even if you can do it,

[01:10:19] how do you harness that energy in a practical way?

[01:10:22] Well essentially what's been done is

[01:10:24] you can boil water with it to do so

[01:10:27] using one of Tesla's electrical generators.

[01:10:33] So that being the case,

[01:10:35] this is how nuclear power has come to be.

[01:10:37] It's just a fancier way to boil water,

[01:10:39] let's put it that way.

[01:10:41] Is it more energy efficient? I don't know.

[01:10:43] Is it more sustainable? I don't know.

[01:10:46] Is it more dangerous? I don't know.

[01:10:48] Once again, we have all of these things

[01:10:50] come into question.

[01:10:53] And we certainly also have the question of

[01:10:57] weaponized nuclear forces.

[01:11:01] How could this be applied to a weapons system?

[01:11:05] And of course Tesla didn't think it was practical.

[01:11:09] But let's continue here.

[01:11:12] Tesla, age 75, predicts new power source.

[01:11:15] This is from the New York Times, July 5th, 1931.

[01:11:19] When and where do you expect to make the official announcement

[01:11:22] of your new discoveries?

[01:11:24] These discoveries, he replied,

[01:11:27] did not come to me overnight,

[01:11:29] but as the result of intense study and experimentation

[01:11:32] for nearly 36 years.

[01:11:34] I am naturally anxious to give the facts

[01:11:36] to the world as soon as possible,

[01:11:38] but I also wish to present them in a finished form.

[01:11:41] That may take a few months or a few years.

[01:11:44] The idea of atomic energy is illusionary,

[01:11:47] but it has taken so powerful a hold on the minds

[01:11:50] that although I have preached against it for 25 years,

[01:11:53] there are still some who believe it to be realizable.

[01:11:56] I have disintegrated atoms in my experiments

[01:11:59] with a high potential vacuum tube I brought out in 1896,

[01:12:04] which I consider one of the best inventions.

[01:12:07] I have operated it with pressures

[01:12:09] ranging from 4 million to 18 million volts.

[01:12:12] More recently, I have designed an apparatus

[01:12:15] for 50 million volts,

[01:12:17] which should produce many results

[01:12:19] of great scientific importance.

[01:12:21] But as to atomic energy,

[01:12:23] my experimental observations have shown

[01:12:25] that the process of disintegration

[01:12:27] is not accompanied by a liberation of such energy

[01:12:30] as might be expected from the present theories.

[01:12:34] That's the end of the quote.

[01:12:38] So that was Tesla in 1931.

[01:12:46] So based upon Tesla's observations,

[01:12:51] it seems feasible that there could be

[01:12:58] some deceptions going on as pertaining to nuclear power.

[01:13:06] Once again, all of this is open for debate and speculation.

[01:13:11] Was Tesla wrong?

[01:13:13] Or were the other scientists

[01:13:15] who were exploring nuclear power wrong?

[01:13:17] Hard to say for sure.

[01:13:19] But this guy was the pioneer.

[01:13:21] And he had been vociferously speaking out

[01:13:25] against trying to utilize this nuclear energy concept

[01:13:28] for 25 years at that point.

[01:13:31] Because early on in his experiments,

[01:13:35] he was doing that.

[01:13:37] So what really goes on with the use of nuclear energy?

[01:13:46] Hard to tell.

[01:13:51] I don't have the answers, folks.

[01:13:53] I'll leave that open for your speculation.

[01:13:55] But getting back on point,

[01:13:59] back to the death ray implementation itself.

[01:14:02] Aerial defense death beam offered to the U.S. by Tesla.

[01:14:06] This is from the Baltimore Sun, July 12, 1940.

[01:14:10] The voltages for propelling the death beam to its objective,

[01:14:13] he stated, will attain a potential of 50 million volts.

[01:14:16] With this enormous voltage, he said,

[01:14:19] microscopic particles of matter will be catapulted

[01:14:22] on their mission of defensive destruction.

[01:14:25] So once again, I'm going to pause and remember now,

[01:14:28] Tesla was talking about using mercury within the apparatus

[01:14:34] as the microscopic particle to be propelled

[01:14:38] through the electrical beam of this death ray

[01:14:42] as a destructive force.

[01:14:45] Think about that.

[01:14:49] Now, this is something that many of us don't realize

[01:14:53] about this concept of Tesla's death ray.

[01:14:55] And this is probably where a lot of things have been

[01:14:57] misconstrued because people were primarily thinking,

[01:15:00] it's a way of trying to channel an electrical current

[01:15:03] into a type of a bolt, like a lightning bolt.

[01:15:08] That's not what his intention was.

[01:15:10] You see, he was propelling an actual physical object

[01:15:14] with this bolt, a highly charged object,

[01:15:19] at a high velocity, approaching the velocity

[01:15:22] of the speed of light.

[01:15:24] At such speeds, this would have immense destructive power.

[01:15:30] So is there a reality to this?

[01:15:33] Hard to say.

[01:15:35] Let's read now.

[01:15:38] This is from the New York Herald Tribune,

[01:15:40] July 11th, 1934.

[01:15:42] Beam to kill Army at 200 miles,

[01:15:45] Tesla's claim on 78th birthday.

[01:15:47] It's an electric gun.

[01:15:49] The beam of force itself, as Dr. Tesla described it,

[01:15:52] is a concentrated current.

[01:15:54] It need be no thicker than a pencil of microscopic

[01:15:57] particles moving at several hundred times the speed

[01:16:00] of artillery projectiles.

[01:16:02] The machine into which Dr. Tesla combines his four

[01:16:05] devices is in reality a sort of electrical gun.

[01:16:09] He illustrated the sort of thing that the particles

[01:16:12] will be by recalling an incident that occurred

[01:16:15] often enough when he was experimenting with a cathode tube.

[01:16:19] Then sometimes a particle larger than an electron,

[01:16:22] but still very thin, would break off from the cathode,

[01:16:26] pass out of the tube and hit him.

[01:16:29] He said he could feel a sharp stinging pain

[01:16:32] where it entered his body and again at the place

[01:16:34] where it passed out.

[01:16:36] The particles in the beam of force, ammunition,

[01:16:39] which the operators of the generating machine

[01:16:41] will have to supply, will travel far faster

[01:16:44] than such particles as broke off from the cathode,

[01:16:47] and they will travel in concentrations, he said.

[01:16:50] As Dr. Tesla explained it,

[01:16:52] the tremendous speed of the particles will give them

[01:16:55] their destruction-dealing qualities.

[01:16:57] All but the thickest armored surfaces confronting them

[01:17:00] would be melted through in an instant by the heat

[01:17:03] generated in the concussion.

[01:17:05] I should also say, and this is perhaps as important

[01:17:08] as anything else about it, that in this apparatus

[01:17:11] all limitations as to electric force

[01:17:13] and the quantity of electricity transmitted

[01:17:16] have been removed.

[01:17:18] I'm going to pause for a moment here, folks.

[01:17:21] So Tesla is describing an immensely powerful weapon

[01:17:26] that doesn't necessarily translate into

[01:17:31] a lightning bolt unleashed on a target,

[01:17:36] a targeted lightning bolt.

[01:17:39] That's not what it is.

[01:17:44] This is an actual physical thing being propelled.

[01:17:50] That's the basis of his death ray.

[01:17:53] Now, yes, it's going to be superheated

[01:18:00] like plasma in a lightning bolt.

[01:18:05] But we're talking these are physical particles

[01:18:07] of some sort, and he was suggesting Mercury

[01:18:11] would fulfill this.

[01:18:13] So these destructive capacities that this would

[01:18:20] potentially have seems massive, especially when

[01:18:23] he's saying here that all limitations of electric

[01:18:30] force and quantity of electricity transmitted

[01:18:33] have been removed.

[01:18:34] So you could amp this up to any type or level

[01:18:41] of energy that you want.

[01:18:43] This could be a massively destructive thing,

[01:18:46] massively, when you consider the ramifications here.

[01:18:53] Now, like I said, there's an interesting crossover

[01:18:55] here that I had never thought about before.

[01:18:59] Tesla's death ray and the Nazi Bell project,

[01:19:03] Deglaca, Mercury used in the cyclotron of the bell.

[01:19:10] Mercury used in what could be considered

[01:19:13] a cyclotron in Tesla's death ray tower here.

[01:19:18] Interesting, interesting.

[01:19:24] So it's all about forming this gun system

[01:19:28] and targeting system.

[01:19:30] And that's what was one of the patents,

[01:19:32] one of the four patents here that Tesla had

[01:19:35] applied to the death ray.

[01:19:37] Let's read on and see what else we can garner here.

[01:19:43] Now, here's a prepared statement of Tesla

[01:19:46] for an interview with the press that he did

[01:19:48] on his 81st birthday observance.

[01:19:51] Quote,

[01:20:18] Quote,

[01:20:48] Quote,

[01:21:18] Let's pause for a moment, folks.

[01:21:24] I do find it compelling that Tesla uses the term

[01:21:29] a blazing star.

[01:21:34] This gives me a bit of a repose to some

[01:21:37] esoteric doctrines when I'm thinking in these terms.

[01:21:42] But what he is saying here is we make assumptions

[01:21:50] And the notion of an electron as a fundamental particle is an assumption.

[01:21:55] You see, it's just a unit of measurement for the discharge of electricity.

[01:21:59] That's what the original use of the term has always been.

[01:22:04] But our modern science with the cult of bumping particles has conflated it to being

[01:22:10] a subatomic fundamental particle.

[01:22:13] When that's not necessarily the case.

[01:22:15] It's not the same thing being described in the physics of the ether model.

[01:22:25] Proposing the death ray for defense, this is a Philadelphia Inquirer article from October 20, 1940.

[01:22:31] Quote, it is based on an entirely new principle of physics that nobody has ever dreamed of.

[01:22:38] It is different from the principle embodied in many...

[01:22:41] In... sorry, excuse me, let me start that again.

[01:22:43] Quote, it is based on an entirely new principle of physics that nobody ever has dreamed of.

[01:22:49] It is different from the principle embodied in my inventions relating to the transmission

[01:22:53] of electrical power from a distance for which I hold a number of basic patents.

[01:23:00] After preliminary laboratory experiments, I made tests on a large scale with the

[01:23:05] transmitter referred to and a beam of ultraviolet rays of great energy in an attempt to conduct

[01:23:11] the current to the high rarefied strata of the air and thus create an auroral display

[01:23:18] such as might be utilized for illumination especially of oceans at night.

[01:23:23] I found that there was some virtue in the principle, but the results did not justify

[01:23:28] the hope of important practical applications although some years later several inventors

[01:23:33] claimed to have produced a death ray in this manner.

[01:23:38] Well, the published reports to this effect were entirely unfounded.

[01:23:42] I believe that with the new transmitter to be built many wonders will be achieved.

[01:23:48] End quote.

[01:23:50] So we see here other interesting crossovers.

[01:23:58] Tesla used a large scale transmitter and ultraviolet rays to produce auroral effects

[01:24:11] in the atmosphere.

[01:24:13] What did we witness here recently?

[01:24:18] Auroral effects in the atmosphere.

[01:24:19] Now some people have claimed that this wasn't the result of solar flares, but it

[01:24:27] was an experiment produced by HAARP or similar type systems.

[01:24:36] Now is this true?

[01:24:37] I don't know.

[01:24:38] I haven't explored or vetted out that way of thinking, but it can be done.

[01:24:46] Tesla proved it.

[01:24:50] At any rate we see here many of Tesla's patents were important in the production

[01:25:00] of some modern technologies.

[01:25:03] Things like particle accelerators.

[01:25:05] Of course we know our whole foundation of the wireless communication networks are

[01:25:14] based upon his technologies.

[01:25:17] Alternating current electricity.

[01:25:18] His generators are used everywhere to produce electricity.

[01:25:26] We have all these different things attributed to Tesla and his most

[01:25:30] controversial invention, the death ray, has always been something that people

[01:25:41] disregard as being a true thing.

[01:25:48] But we have some extensive documentation of things that are akin to Tesla's death ray

[01:26:00] that are utilized in the modern era.

[01:26:02] Of course we're speaking of directed energy weapons.

[01:26:08] These things do exist and I think a lot of it has come to pass because of the

[01:26:16] study of Tesla's death ray.

[01:26:23] Did it really exist?

[01:26:24] Did he build it?

[01:26:25] He claims to have been able to build this in 1915.

[01:26:28] He's experimented with it and has ramped it up and announced in 1934 that it was

[01:26:35] now possible and he tried to sell it to certain governments around the world.

[01:26:40] And only the Russians bought some of the preliminary stages of his patent and what

[01:26:45] they did with that is still unknown, but we know we have modern directed energy

[01:26:50] weapons.

[01:26:53] After a century of Tesla's ideas we still don't know about the feasibility of his

[01:26:57] death ray, but some modern technologies are becoming a reality with the same

[01:27:02] objectives.

[01:27:03] A directed energy weapon emits highly focused energy, transferring that

[01:27:07] energy to a target to damage it.

[01:27:10] Potential applications of this technology include anti-personnel

[01:27:13] weapons systems, potential weapon defense systems and the disability of

[01:27:17] lightly armored vehicles such as cars, drones, jet skis, electronic devices

[01:27:22] such as mobile phones, military applications for blocking enemy

[01:27:25] electronics and communications, protecting convoys and high-risk IED

[01:27:29] zones.

[01:27:30] Systems able to protect critical areas and equipment as well as new systems

[01:27:35] for police and civil enforcement deployment are all driving continued

[01:27:39] research and development in directed energy systems.

[01:27:44] And of course this goes on to mention the SDI system, the Star Wars

[01:27:47] Defense System from Los Alamos National Laboratory in 1989 when the

[01:27:54] Reagan administration announced this in the 1980s and they ostensibly began

[01:27:59] to develop these space-based weapons.

[01:28:04] We don't know the truth about all of this, but we do know many of these

[01:28:08] were based on some of Tesla's patents and ideas.

[01:28:13] Directed energy weapons, well now these have gotten beyond what Tesla

[01:28:20] envisioned with his death ray.

[01:28:25] Now we have scalar weapons.

[01:28:30] These things are a magnitude greater than Tesla's death ray and these

[01:28:33] have been developed.

[01:28:36] And by the way as an added note, the feasibility of Tesla's death ray

[01:28:43] being operational and being a real thing as proof of concept, this was

[01:28:57] proven in a documentary series that aired in 2017 and 2018.

[01:29:03] A little-known documentary series called Tesla's Death Ray, a Murder

[01:29:06] Declassified.

[01:29:07] Well, one of the scientists working to try to reproduce Tesla's death

[01:29:14] ray was able to build a working model, a 20-foot tall tower based upon

[01:29:21] Tesla's patents and it was able to shoot drones out of the air multiple times

[01:29:29] in their own experiments.

[01:29:31] Now this was a smaller mock-up, but it definitely was proof of concept.

[01:29:40] You see Tesla's death ray, he was on point.

[01:29:44] He really developed the patents and technologies to do this.

[01:29:50] He most likely could have done exactly everything he said with it.

[01:29:55] This was proven by scientific experiment and observation documented in this little-known

[01:30:03] documentary.

[01:30:04] It's been reproduced on a small scale.

[01:30:10] Now if it's been reproduced on a small scale by somebody in the public

[01:30:13] sector for a documentary, imagine what the military industrial complex has done with

[01:30:18] this.

[01:30:20] Decades prior to this, especially when you speculate that they had access to some of

[01:30:30] these lost notes that were missing from Tesla's personal belongings when the FBI seized them

[01:30:40] in 1943 upon his death.

[01:30:44] What do they have in their records that they've worked with?

[01:30:50] These things have been developed for real.

[01:30:53] In the real world, we have many weapon systems that are based upon these ideas put forth

[01:31:01] by Tesla.

[01:31:02] So Tesla's death ray, fact or fiction?

[01:31:07] Fact.

[01:31:09] And they've developed it to a larger scale and they've developed it in directed

[01:31:14] energy weapons, scalar wave weapons, which I think Tesla was on the precipice

[01:31:25] of discovering the true nature and power of scalar wave technology upon his death.

[01:31:35] And I think his experiments and observations were sussing out a lot of the early aspects

[01:31:41] of this.

[01:31:43] And those within the auspices of these special access programs of the military

[01:31:47] industrial complex have likely developed this out into real applications today.

[01:31:54] And we see the fingerprints of these technologies being used today.

[01:32:00] Certainly scalar wave directed energy weapons are a real thing.

[01:32:07] These are all based upon Tesla's patents.

[01:32:12] So at the end of the day, Tesla's death ray?

[01:32:15] Yes.

[01:32:17] This was real.

[01:32:18] This is not conspiracy theory or legend.

[01:32:24] This was a real device that he was able to design and build.

[01:32:32] I don't think Tesla ever utilized this in that way, though.

[01:32:36] If he did, it was under very strict circumstances, I'm sure.

[01:32:43] And the results of which he probably kept to himself.

[01:32:46] Unless, of course, these are the things that are among his lost notes.

[01:32:53] That are only speculated as to existing.

[01:32:56] We don't know the true nature of all of that.

[01:32:58] We do know that there are those who have testified that there were pages missing from

[01:33:04] the documentation that they received from the FBI.

[01:33:08] And the FBI itself claims that somebody had been there prior to them and had taken

[01:33:12] some things out of Tesla's room before they even got there.

[01:33:19] And as an interesting point to all of this was Donald Trump's uncle, who was

[01:33:31] one of the initial people involved with obtaining Tesla's goods and notes and property from

[01:33:42] the New Yorker Hotel upon his death.

[01:33:46] Political intrigue abounds with all of this stuff, but that's a story for another day.

[01:33:52] But let's leave it there tonight, folks.

[01:33:54] Tesla's death ray.

[01:33:55] Fact, not fiction.

[01:34:00] Is feasible has been proven.

[01:34:02] The proof of concept has been established.

[01:34:04] It works.

[01:34:08] It probably works well beyond the scale of what's accepted in the mainstream public.

[01:34:18] At any rate, that's all the time we have for tonight, folks.

[01:34:21] I want to thank you all for tuning in.

[01:34:23] I want to remind you that I appreciate each and every one of you.

[01:34:26] We'll catch you next time.

[01:34:27] Have a good one now.

[01:34:29] Discover the amazing clinically proven health benefits of Original Tahitian Noni.

[01:34:35] Original Tahitian Noni includes powerful antioxidants, adaptogens, nutrients and phytonutrients

[01:34:40] to naturally boost energy levels, immune system function and overall health meticulously

[01:34:45] sourced from French Polynesia.

[01:34:47] This is the original super fruit, except no imitations.

[01:34:51] Original Tahitian Noni.

[01:34:53] Visit ATR Health at alchemicaltechrevolution.com and click on the shop here tab for more

[01:34:59] details.

[01:35:00] ...lead the world in facing down a threat to decency and humanity.

[01:35:05] What is at stake?

[01:35:08] It is more than just one call-caller.

[01:35:12] It is a big idea.

[01:35:14] Because of oppression has been wrongfully made.

[01:35:17] Every faith will gather inside the church.

[01:35:21] Faithful, faithful, faithful, faithful.

[01:35:25] ...the grumpers, the mass graves, the content of the mind.

[01:35:31] The grumpers of the benefits of these tears.

[01:35:34] A new world order.

[01:35:37] A new world order.

[01:35:39] A new world order.

[01:35:41] A new world order.